These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27766143)

  • 1. What health care services does the public want and who should decide? Ask them!
    Diederich A
    Isr J Health Policy Res; 2016; 5():47. PubMed ID: 27766143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Decision-makers' acquaintance with the public's priorities in health services.
    Kaplan G; Baron-Epel O
    Isr J Health Policy Res; 2016; 5():32. PubMed ID: 27358725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Priority setting in health care as portrayed in South Korean and Israeli newspapers.
    Factor R; Kang M
    Health Policy; 2014 Feb; 114(2-3):226-35. PubMed ID: 24388048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Personal needs versus national needs: public attitudes regarding health care priorities at the personal and national levels.
    Kaplan G; Baron-Epel O
    Isr J Health Policy Res; 2015; 4():15. PubMed ID: 25984294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The public's attitude and perception concerning witnessed cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
    Mazer MA; Cox LA; Capon JA
    Crit Care Med; 2006 Dec; 34(12):2925-8. PubMed ID: 17075365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Public preferences for engagement in Health Technology Assessment decision-making: protocol of a mixed methods study.
    Wortley S; Tong A; Lancsar E; Salkeld G; Howard K
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2015 Jul; 15():52. PubMed ID: 26166149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Primary care physicians in Israel: self-perception of their role in the healthcare system and policy makers' and patients' perception of them as gatekeepers.
    Tabenkin H; Gross R; Greenberg SB; Steinmetz D; Elhayany A
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2001 Dec; 3(12):893-7. PubMed ID: 11794909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Horizontal equity in medical care: a study of the Israeli public's views.
    Shmueli A
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2000 Oct; 2(10):746-52. PubMed ID: 11344725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. It takes a giraffe to see the big picture - citizens' view on decision makers in health care rationing.
    Broqvist M; Garpenby P
    Soc Sci Med; 2015 Mar; 128():301-8. PubMed ID: 25638017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Setting priorities for high-cost medications in public hospitals in Australia: should the public be involved?
    Gallego G; Taylor SJ; Brien JA
    Aust Health Rev; 2011 May; 35(2):191-6. PubMed ID: 21612733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Local health policies and health planning from the viewpoint of the decision-makers of the local authorities].
    Ziemer B; Grunow-Lutter V
    Gesundheitswesen; 2007 Oct; 69(10):534-40. PubMed ID: 18040960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does the community want devolved authority? Results of deliberative polling in Ontario.
    Abelson J; Lomas J; Eyles J; Birch S; Veenstra G
    CMAJ; 1995 Aug; 153(4):403-12. PubMed ID: 7634217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Public perceptions of comparative effectiveness research and use of evidence in healthcare decision-making.
    Cornwell D; Hu M; Esposito D
    J Comp Eff Res; 2014 Nov; 3(6):623-34. PubMed ID: 25494569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. New perspectives on litigation and the public's health.
    Bontá D; Praeger S; Schlichtmann J
    J Law Med Ethics; 2002; 30(3 Suppl):33-40. PubMed ID: 12508499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Criteria for medical prioritisation: results from a regional survey and methodological reflections].
    Stumpf S; Hecker S; Raspe H
    Gesundheitswesen; 2014 Apr; 76(4):221-31. PubMed ID: 23913398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
    Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The public funding of expensive cancer therapies: synthesizing the "3Es"--evidence, economics, and ethics.
    Kirby J; Somers E; Simpson C; McPhee J
    Organ Ethic; 2008; 4(2):97-108. PubMed ID: 18839752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Community participation in health care decision making: is it feasible?
    Singer MA
    CMAJ; 1995 Aug; 153(4):421-4. PubMed ID: 7634219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.