These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27767168)

  • 1. Post Gillick: Adolescent autonomy revisited: clinicians need clearer guidance.
    Br Dent J; 2016 Oct; 221(8):475. PubMed ID: 27767168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adolescent autonomy revisited: clinicians need clearer guidance.
    Brierley J; Larcher V
    J Med Ethics; 2016 Aug; 42(8):482-5. PubMed ID: 27003419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Children, Parents, Courts and Medical Treatment: Now Who Decides?
    Manning J
    J Law Med; 2021 Dec; 28(4):931-945. PubMed ID: 34907677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Limiting Gillick.
    Douglas G
    Bull Med Ethics; 1992 Feb; No. 75():34-5. PubMed ID: 11651271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Treatment without consent: intervention by the court.
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 May; 290(6479):1409-10. PubMed ID: 11658570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Teenage confidence and consent.
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Jan; 290(6462):144-5. PubMed ID: 3917719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Re K, W and H (Minors) (Medical Treatment).
    Great Britain. England. High Court of Justice, Family Division
    Fam Law Rep; 1992 Sep; 1993():854-9. PubMed ID: 12041092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Arguments against health care autonomy for minors.
    Ross LF
    Bioethics Forum; 1995; 11(4):22-6. PubMed ID: 11654287
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Arguments against respecting a minor's refusal of efficacious life-saving treatment redux, part II.
    Ross LF
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2009; 18(4):432-40; discussion 440-2. PubMed ID: 19739333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gillick, bone marrow and teenagers.
    Cherkassky L
    Med Leg J; 2015 Sep; 83(3):154-8. PubMed ID: 25911618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority.
    Great Britain. England. Court of Appeal, Civil Division
    All Engl Law Rep; 1984 Nov 19-Dec 20 (date of decision); 1985(1):533-59. PubMed ID: 11648530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Children who withdraw consent for elective surgery.
    Stokes MA; Drake-Lee AB
    Paediatr Anaesth; 1998; 8(2):113-5. PubMed ID: 9549735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The right of minors to confidential access to contraceptives.
    Morano AL
    Albany Law Rev; 1982; 47(1):214-40. PubMed ID: 11658598
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Gillick saga The Gillick saga -- II.
    Williams G
    New Law J; 1985 Nov 22-29; 135(6230 and 6231):1156-1158, 1179-1182. PubMed ID: 11660424
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Informed consent? A child's right to autonomy.
    Drake C
    J Child Health Care; 2001; 5(3):101-4. PubMed ID: 11811438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Righting a child's right to refuse medical treatment: Section 11 of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act and the Gillick competent child.
    Austin G
    Otago Law Rev; 1992; 7(4):578-96. PubMed ID: 11659776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Medical treatment of children.
    Kerr G
    North Irel Leg Q; 1984; 35(2):185-93. PubMed ID: 11658590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinicians' knowledge of informed consent.
    Fisher-Jeffes L; Barton C; Finlay F
    J Med Ethics; 2007 Mar; 33(3):181-4. PubMed ID: 17329394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing children's competence to consent to treatment.
    Griffith R; Tengnah C
    Br J Community Nurs; 2012 Feb; 17(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 22306602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of children in making health care decisions: a comparative approach.
    Broyde CS
    Natl Jew Law Rev; 1987; 2():123-35. PubMed ID: 11658826
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.