These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

58 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2776739)

  • 1. Symmetric and asymmetric manual materials handling, Part 2: Biomechanics.
    Drury CG; Deeb JM; Hartman B; Woolley S; Drury CE; Gallagher S
    Ergonomics; 1989 Jun; 32(6):565-83. PubMed ID: 2776739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Symmetric and asymmetric manual materials handling. Part 1: Physiology and psychophysics.
    Drury CG; Deeb JM; Hartman B; Woolley S; Drury CE; Gallagher S
    Ergonomics; 1989 May; 32(5):467-89. PubMed ID: 2767042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Simulation of manual materials handling: biomechanial assessment under different lifting conditions.
    Gündogdu O; Anderson KS; Parnianpour M
    Technol Health Care; 2005; 13(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 15706064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The development of a model to predict the effects of worker and task factors on foot placements in manual material handling tasks.
    Wagner DW; Reed MP; Chaffin DB
    Ergonomics; 2010 Nov; 53(11):1368-84. PubMed ID: 20967659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimation of 3-D peak L5/S1 joint moment during asymmetric lifting tasks with cubic spline interpolation of segment Euler angles.
    Xu X; Chang CC; Faber GS; Kingma I; Dennerlein JT
    Appl Ergon; 2012 Jan; 43(1):115-20. PubMed ID: 21529774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The load on the lumbar spine during asymmetrical bi-manual materials handling.
    Jäger M; Luttmann A
    Ergonomics; 1992; 35(7-8):783-805. PubMed ID: 1633789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical differences between expert and novice workers in a manual material handling task.
    Plamondon A; Denis D; Delisle A; Lariviere C; Salazar E;
    Ergonomics; 2010 Oct; 53(10):1239-53. PubMed ID: 20865607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Posture and motion variability in non-repetitive manual materials handling tasks.
    Perez MA; Nussbaum MA
    Hum Mov Sci; 2006 Jun; 25(3):409-21. PubMed ID: 16684575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dynamic biomechanical modelling of symmetric and asymmetric lifting tasks in restricted postures.
    Gallagher S; Hamrick CA; Love AC; Marras WS
    Ergonomics; 1994 Aug; 37(8):1289-310. PubMed ID: 7925254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A survey of the optimal handle position for boxes with different sizes and manual handling positions.
    Jung HS; Jung HS
    Appl Ergon; 2010 Jan; 41(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 19589498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hand-hold location and trunk kinematics during box handling.
    Haddad O; Mirka GA
    Ergonomics; 2010 Aug; 53(8):1033-8. PubMed ID: 20658397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ready steady push--a study of the role of arm posture in manual exertions.
    Okunribido OO; Haslegrave CM
    Ergonomics; 2008 Feb; 51(2):192-216. PubMed ID: 17852368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prediction accuracy in estimating joint angle trajectories using a video posture coding method for sagittal lifting tasks.
    Chang CC; McGorry RW; Lin JH; Xu X; Hsiang SM
    Ergonomics; 2010 Aug; 53(8):1039-47. PubMed ID: 20658398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acceptable weights and physiological costs of performing combined manual handling tasks in restricted postures.
    Gallagher S
    Ergonomics; 1991 Jul; 34(7):939-52. PubMed ID: 1915255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Handle positions in a holding task as a function of task height.
    Deeb JM; Drury CG; Begbie KL
    Ergonomics; 1985 May; 28(5):747-63. PubMed ID: 4018018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intertask comparison of frontal plane knee position and moment in female athletes during three distinct movement tasks.
    Harty CM; DuPont CE; Chmielewski TL; Mizner RL
    Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2011 Feb; 21(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 19895386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spine loading during asymmetric lifting using one versus two hands.
    Marras WS; Davis KG
    Ergonomics; 1998 Jun; 41(6):817-34. PubMed ID: 9629066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of a sloped ground surface on trunk kinematics and L5/S1 moment during lifting.
    Shin G; Mirka G
    Ergonomics; 2004 May; 47(6):646-59. PubMed ID: 15204292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modifying center of mass trajectory during sit-to-stand tasks redistributes the mechanical demand across the lower extremity joints.
    Mathiyakom W; McNitt-Gray JL; Requejo P; Costa K
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2005 Jan; 20(1):105-11. PubMed ID: 15567544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Two kinematic synergies in voluntary whole-body movements during standing.
    Freitas SM; Duarte M; Latash ML
    J Neurophysiol; 2006 Feb; 95(2):636-45. PubMed ID: 16267118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.