356 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27768022)
1. Advantages of the supine transgluteal approach for distal ureteral stone extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: outcomes based on CT characteristics.
Galli R; Sighinolfi MC; Micali S; Martorana E; Rosa M; Mofferdin A; Bianchi G
Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2017 Apr; 69(2):189-194. PubMed ID: 27768022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy to distal ureteric stones: the transgluteal approach significantly increases stone-free rates.
Phipps S; Stephenson C; Tolley D
BJU Int; 2013 Jul; 112(2):E129-33. PubMed ID: 23360696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Supine transgluteal vs prone position in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of distal ureteric stones.
Kamel M; Salem EA; Maarouf A; Abdalla M; Ragab A; Shahin AM
Urology; 2015 Jan; 85(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 25440820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The transgluteal approach to shockwave lithotripsy to treat distal ureter stones: a prospective, randomized, and multicenter study.
Choo MS; Han JH; Kim JK; Shin TY; Lee WK; Lee SK; Lee SH
World J Urol; 2018 Aug; 36(8):1299-1306. PubMed ID: 29549483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How do stone attenuation and skin-to-stone distance in computed tomography influence the performance of shock wave lithotripsy in ureteral stone disease?
Müllhaupt G; Engeler DS; Schmid HP; Abt D
BMC Urol; 2015 Jul; 15():72. PubMed ID: 26201514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy as first line treatment for urinary tract stones in children: outcome of 500 cases.
Badawy AA; Saleem MD; Abolyosr A; Aldahshoury M; Elbadry MS; Abdalla MA; Abuzeid AM
Int Urol Nephrol; 2012 Jun; 44(3):661-6. PubMed ID: 22350835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sciaticum majus foramen and sciaticum minus foramen as the path of SWL in the supine position to treat distal ureteral stone.
Lu J; Sun X; He L
Urol Res; 2010 Dec; 38(6):417-20. PubMed ID: 20625895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A simple position to provide better imaging of upper ureteral stones close to the crista iliaca during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy using the Siemens Lithostar.
Tansu N; Obek C; Onal B; Yalçin V; Oner A; Solok V
Eur Urol; 2004 Mar; 45(3):352-5. PubMed ID: 15036682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can stone density on plain radiography predict the outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones?
Lim KH; Jung JH; Kwon JH; Lee YS; Bae J; Cho MC; Lee KS; Lee HW
Korean J Urol; 2015 Jan; 56(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 25598937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A new nomogram for prediction of outcome of pediatric shock-wave lithotripsy.
Dogan HS; Altan M; Citamak B; Bozaci AC; Karabulut E; Tekgul S
J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Apr; 11(2):84.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25812469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ureteral stones: SWL treatment.
Zanetti G
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2011 Mar; 83(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 21585162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Single extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for proximal ureter stones: Can CT texture analysis technique help predict the therapeutic effect?
Xun Y; Li J; Geng Y; Liu Z; Yu X; Wang X; Xiao F; Li Z; Li C; Wang S
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 107():84-89. PubMed ID: 30292278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating the importance of mean stone density and skin-to-stone distance in predicting successful shock wave lithotripsy of renal and ureteric calculi.
Wiesenthal JD; Ghiculete D; D'A Honey RJ; Pace KT
Urol Res; 2010 Aug; 38(4):307-13. PubMed ID: 20625891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: retrospective study on possible predictors of treatment success and revisiting the role of non-contrast-enhanced computer tomography in kidney and ureteral stone disease.
Oliveira B; Teixeira B; Magalhães M; Vinagre N; Fraga A; Cavadas V
Urolithiasis; 2024 Apr; 52(1):65. PubMed ID: 38630281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of ureteral stones in children.
Pirincci N; Gecit I; Bilici S; Taken K; Tanik S; Ceylan K
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2012 Oct; 16(10):1404-8. PubMed ID: 23104657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy with patients rotated supine or rotated prone for treating ureteral stones: a case-control study.
Hara N; Koike H; Bilim V; Takahashi K; Nishiyama T
J Endourol; 2006 Mar; 20(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 16548722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intracorporeal or extracorporeal lithotripsy for distal ureteral calculi? Effect of stone size and multiplicity on success rates.
Eden CG; Mark IR; Gupta RR; Eastman J; Shrotri NC; Tiptaft RC
J Endourol; 1998 Aug; 12(4):307-12. PubMed ID: 9726396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones in children.
Lu J; Sun X; He L; Wang Y
Pediatr Surg Int; 2009 Dec; 25(12):1109-12. PubMed ID: 19816698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does the Prone Position During the Shockwave Lithotripsy of Kidney Stones Improve the Stone-Free Rate? Results from a Randomized Clinical Trial.
Mohammadi A; Oliveira Reis L; Khajavi A; Zareian Baghdadabad L; Aghamir SMK
Urol J; 2023 May; 20(3):136-143. PubMed ID: 36695211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Simple and practical nomograms for predicting the stone-free rate after shock wave lithotripsy in patients with a solitary upper ureteral stone.
Niwa N; Matsumoto K; Miyahara M; Omura M; Kobayashi H; Kikuchi E; Miyajima A; Miyata K; Oya M
World J Urol; 2017 Sep; 35(9):1455-1461. PubMed ID: 28220189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
