211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27768168)
21. Risk-stratification based on magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density may reduce unnecessary follow-up biopsy procedures in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.
Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Drost FH; van Leenders GJ; Bokhorst LP; Bangma CH; Schoots IG
BJU Int; 2017 Oct; 120(4):511-519. PubMed ID: 28267899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The Value of an Extensive Transrectal Repeat Biopsy with Anterior Sampling in Men on Active Surveillance for Low-risk Prostate Cancer: A Comparison from the Randomised Study of Active Monitoring in Sweden (SAMS).
Bratt O; Holmberg E; Andrén O; Carlsson S; Drevin L; Johansson E; Josefsson A; Nyberg M; Sandberg J; Stattin P; Robinsson D
Eur Urol; 2019 Oct; 76(4):461-466. PubMed ID: 30878303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. An evidence review of active surveillance in men with localized prostate cancer.
Ip S; Dahabreh IJ; Chung M; Yu WW; Balk EM; Iovin RC; Mathew P; Luongo T; Dvorak T; Lau J
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep); 2011 Dec; (204):1-341. PubMed ID: 23126653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. African American Race is Not Associated with Risk of Reclassification during Active Surveillance: Results from the Canary Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Study.
Schenk JM; Newcomb LF; Zheng Y; Faino AV; Zhu K; Nyame YA; Brooks JD; Carroll PR; Cooperberg MR; Dash A; Filson CP; Gleave ME; Liss M; Martin FM; Morgan TM; Nelson PS; Thompson IM; Wagner AA; Lin DW
J Urol; 2020 Apr; 203(4):727-733. PubMed ID: 31651227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The Clinical Significance of Multiple Negative Surveillance Prostate Biopsies for Men on Active Surveillance-Does Cancer Vanish or Simply Hide?
Chu CE; Cowan JE; Fasulo V; Washington SL; de la Calle C; Shoemaker J; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2021 Jan; 205(1):109-114. PubMed ID: 33198555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Association of Prostate-Specific Antigen Velocity With Clinical Progression Among African American and Non-Hispanic White Men Treated for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer With Active Surveillance.
Nelson TJ; Javier-DesLoges J; Deka R; Courtney PT; Nalawade V; Mell L; Murphy J; Parsons JK; Rose BS
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 May; 4(5):e219452. PubMed ID: 33999164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Utility of early transperineal template-guided prostate biopsy for risk stratification in men undergoing active surveillance for prostate cancer.
Voss J; Pal R; Ahmed S; Hannah M; Jaulim A; Walton T
BJU Int; 2018 Jun; 121(6):863-870. PubMed ID: 29239082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Prostate cancer screening in men aged 50-69 years (STHLM3): a prospective population-based diagnostic study.
Grönberg H; Adolfsson J; Aly M; Nordström T; Wiklund P; Brandberg Y; Thompson J; Wiklund F; Lindberg J; Clements M; Egevad L; Eklund M
Lancet Oncol; 2015 Dec; 16(16):1667-76. PubMed ID: 26563502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Confirmatory Biopsy for Initiating Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer.
Jayadevan R; Felker ER; Kwan L; Barsa DE; Zhang H; Sisk AE; Delfin M; Marks LS
JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Sep; 2(9):e1911019. PubMed ID: 31509206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Population-based study of grade progression in patients who harboured Gleason 3 + 3.
Sampurno F; Earnest A; Millar J; Frydenberg M; Murphy D; Delprado W; Evans S
World J Urol; 2017 Nov; 35(11):1689-1699. PubMed ID: 28500489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Risk of Upgrading and Upstaging Among 10 000 Patients with Gleason 3+4 Favorable Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer.
Yang DD; Mahal BA; Muralidhar V; Nezolosky MD; Vastola ME; Labe SA; Boldbaatar N; King MT; Martin NE; Orio PF; Beard CJ; Hoffman KE; Trinh QD; Spratt DE; Feng FY; Nguyen PL
Eur Urol Focus; 2019 Jan; 5(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 28753811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Defining Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer Suitable for Active Surveillance.
Loeb S; Folkvaljon Y; Bratt O; Robinson D; Stattin P
J Urol; 2019 Feb; 201(2):292-299. PubMed ID: 30240688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Is there any association between prostate-specific antigen screening frequency and uptake of active surveillance in men with low or very low risk prostate cancer?
Beckmann K; Kinsella N; Olsson H; Wallerstedt Lantz A; Nordstrom T; Aly M; Adolfsson J; Eklund M; Van Hemelrijck M
BMC Urol; 2019 Aug; 19(1):73. PubMed ID: 31383015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Pathologic Outcomes of Gleason 6 Favorable Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Treated With Radical Prostatectomy: Implications for Active Surveillance.
Yang DD; Mahal BA; Muralidhar V; Vastola ME; Boldbaatar N; Labe SA; Nezolosky MD; Orio PF; King MT; Martin NE; Mouw KW; Trinh QD; Nguyen PL
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2018 Jun; 16(3):226-234. PubMed ID: 29196209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Metastatic Prostate Cancer in Men Initially Treated with Active Surveillance.
Yamamoto T; Musunuru HB; Vesprini D; Zhang L; Ghanem G; Loblaw A; Klotz L
J Urol; 2016 May; 195(5):1409-1414. PubMed ID: 26707510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Clinical characteristics and primary treatment of prostate cancer in Sweden between 1996 and 2005.
Adolfsson J; Garmo H; Varenhorst E; Ahlgren G; Ahlstrand C; Andrén O; Bill-Axelson A; Bratt O; Damber JE; Hellström K; Hellström M; Holmberg E; Holmberg L; Hugosson J; Johansson JE; Petterson B; Törnblom M; Widmark A; Stattin P
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2007; 41(6):456-77. PubMed ID: 17934985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration is positively associated with rate of disease reclassification on subsequent active surveillance prostate biopsy in men with low PSA density.
Umbehr MH; Platz EA; Peskoe SB; Bhavsar NA; Epstein JI; Landis P; Partin AW; Carter HB
BJU Int; 2014 Apr; 113(4):561-7. PubMed ID: 23746233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Factors Associated with Discontinuation of Active Surveillance among Men with Low-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Population-Based Study.
Timilshina N; Komisarenko M; Martin LJ; Cheung DC; Alibhai S; Richard PO; Finelli A
J Urol; 2021 Oct; 206(4):903-913. PubMed ID: 34412510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Improving the Specificity of Screening for Lethal Prostate Cancer Using Prostate-specific Antigen and a Panel of Kallikrein Markers: A Nested Case-Control Study.
Stattin P; Vickers AJ; Sjoberg DD; Johansson R; Granfors T; Johansson M; Pettersson K; Scardino PT; Hallmans G; Lilja H
Eur Urol; 2015 Aug; 68(2):207-13. PubMed ID: 25682340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Role of active surveillance and focal therapy in low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancers.
van der Poel H; Klotz L; Andriole G; Azzouzi AR; Bjartell A; Cussenot O; Hamdy F; Graefen M; Palma P; Rivera AR; Stief CG
World J Urol; 2015 Jul; 33(7):907-16. PubMed ID: 26037891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
