138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27768175)
1. Exploring the Clinical Utility of Relative Fundamental Frequency as an Objective Measure of Vocal Hyperfunction.
Roy N; Fetrow RA; Merrill RM; Dromey C
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2016 Oct; 59(5):1002-1017. PubMed ID: 27768175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of voice therapy on relative fundamental frequency during voicing offset and onset in patients with vocal hyperfunction.
Stepp CE; Merchant GR; Heaton JT; Hillman RE
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Oct; 54(5):1260-6. PubMed ID: 21498578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Acoustic correlate of vocal effort in spasmodic dysphonia.
Eadie TL; Stepp CE
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2013 Mar; 122(3):169-76. PubMed ID: 23577569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The relationship between perception of vocal effort and relative fundamental frequency during voicing offset and onset.
Stepp CE; Sawin DE; Eadie TL
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Dec; 55(6):1887-96. PubMed ID: 22615477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of Adventitious Acute Vocal Trauma: Relative Fundamental Frequency and Listener Perception.
Murray ES; Hands GL; Calabrese CR; Stepp CE
J Voice; 2016 Mar; 30(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 26028369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Relative Fundamental Frequency Distinguishes Between Phonotraumatic and Non-Phonotraumatic Vocal Hyperfunction.
Heller Murray ES; Lien YS; Van Stan JH; Mehta DD; Hillman RE; Pieter Noordzij J; Stepp CE
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Jun; 60(6):1507-1515. PubMed ID: 28595317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relative Fundamental Frequency in Children With and Without Vocal Fold Nodules.
Heller Murray ES; Segina RK; Woodnorth GH; Stepp CE
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Feb; 63(2):361-371. PubMed ID: 32073342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Relationship Between Relative Fundamental Frequency and a Kinematic Estimate of Laryngeal Stiffness in Healthy Adults.
McKenna VS; Heller Murray ES; Lien YS; Stepp CE
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2016 Dec; 59(6):1283-1294. PubMed ID: 27936279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical Cutoff Scores for Acoustic Indices of Vocal Hyperfunction That Combine Relative Fundamental Frequency and Cepstral Peak Prominence.
Kapsner-Smith MR; Díaz-Cádiz ME; Vojtech JM; Buckley DP; Mehta DD; Hillman RE; Tracy LF; Noordzij JP; Eadie TL; Stepp CE
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Apr; 65(4):1349-1369. PubMed ID: 35263546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Characterization of Primary Muscle Tension Dysphonia Using Acoustic and Aerodynamic Voice Metrics.
Shembel AC; Lee J; Sacher JR; Johnson AM
J Voice; 2023 Nov; 37(6):897-906. PubMed ID: 34281751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Voice Relative Fundamental Frequency Via Neck-Skin Acceleration in Individuals With Voice Disorders.
Lien YA; Calabrese CR; Michener CM; Murray EH; Van Stan JH; Mehta DD; Hillman RE; Noordzij JP; Stepp CE
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Oct; 58(5):1482-7. PubMed ID: 26134171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of vocal hyperfunction on relative fundamental frequency during voicing offset and onset.
Stepp CE; Hillman RE; Heaton JT
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Oct; 53(5):1220-6. PubMed ID: 20643798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Effects of Stress Type, Vowel Identity, Baseline f
Park Y; Stepp CE
J Voice; 2019 Sep; 33(5):603-610. PubMed ID: 30078521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical Characteristics and Effects of Vocal Demands in Occupational Voice Users With and Without Primary Muscle Tension Dysphonia.
McDowell S; Morrison R; Mau T; Shembel AC
J Voice; 2022 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 36334967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Acoustic and Physiologic Correlates of Vocal Effort in Individuals With and Without Primary Muscle Tension Dysphonia.
Toles LE; Shembel AC
Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2024 Jan; 33(1):237-247. PubMed ID: 37931092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Effectiveness of Low-Level Light Therapy in Attenuating Vocal Fatigue.
Kagan LS; Heaton JT
J Voice; 2017 May; 31(3):384.e15-384.e23. PubMed ID: 27839705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perceptual and Acoustic Assessment of Strain Using Synthetically Modified Voice Samples.
Park Y; Cádiz MD; Nagle KF; Stepp CE
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Dec; 63(12):3897-3908. PubMed ID: 33151770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Test-Retest Reliability of Relative Fundamental Frequency and Conventional Acoustic, Aerodynamic, and Perceptual Measures in Individuals With Healthy Voices.
Park Y; Stepp CE
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 62(6):1707-1718. PubMed ID: 31181173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Toward improved differential diagnosis of adductor spasmodic dysphonia and muscle tension dysphonia.
Roy N; Mauszycki SC; Merrill RM; Gouse M; Smith ME
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2007; 59(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 17337898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Automated Relative Fundamental Frequency Algorithms for Use With Neck-Surface Accelerometer Signals.
Groll MD; Vojtech JM; Hablani S; Mehta DD; Buckley DP; Noordzij JP; Stepp CE
J Voice; 2022 Mar; 36(2):156-169. PubMed ID: 32653267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
