177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2776905)
1. [The size of the overlapping of the gingival margin in Class II amalgam fillings examined in the teeth and their radiographic images].
Keszthelyi G; Tóth V
Fogorv Sz; 1989 Aug; 82(8):225-32. PubMed ID: 2776905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Discrimination between restorative dental materials by their radiopacity measured in film radiographs and digital images.
Wenzel A; Hintze H; Hørsted-Bindslev P
J Forensic Odontostomatol; 1998 Jun; 16(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 9922755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of restorative materials on marginal gingiva.
Willershausen B; Köttgen C; Ernst CP
Eur J Med Res; 2001 Oct; 6(10):433-9. PubMed ID: 11698230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of Class II amalgam fillings on attachment loss.
Keszthelyi G; Szabo I
J Clin Periodontol; 1984 Feb; 11(2):81-6. PubMed ID: 6583214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of thickness of flowable resins on marginal leakage in class II composite restorations.
Malmström HS; Schlueter M; Roach T; Moss ME
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 12120775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [How good is the marginal adaptation of an "average" amalgam restoration?].
Wöstmann B; Lütke-Notarp E
Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1991 Jan; 46(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 1811965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Evaluation of filling therapy of the lateral teeth and recommendations for the practice].
Sobkowiak EM; Held M
Stomatol DDR; 1976 Aug; 26(8):526-31. PubMed ID: 1068568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Surface roughness and gingival margin seal of proximal fillings with amalgam and posterior composite filling materials].
Geurtsen W
Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1987 Jul; 42(7):673-9. PubMed ID: 3483756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The prevalence of proximal fractures of dental crowns with amalgam fillings.
Pandurić V; Mrakutić M; Tarle Z; Katanec D; Prskalo K; Janković B; Pandurić DG
Coll Antropol; 2009 Jun; 33(2):449-53. PubMed ID: 19662762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A radiographic method of estimating surface area of amalgam restorations.
Sammut E; Deery C; Nugent Z; Ibbetson R
J Dent; 2006 Nov; 34(10):811-6. PubMed ID: 16687199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Problems of overhanging approximate amalgam fillings].
Balazic V; Durovic E
Prakt Zubn Lek; 1989 Oct; 37(10):299-305. PubMed ID: 2640716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of different restorative techniques on microleakage in Class II cavities with gingival wall in cementum.
Demarco FF; Ramos OL; Mota CS; Formolo E; Justino LM
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):253-9. PubMed ID: 11357567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Re-intervention in glass ionomer restorations: what comes next?
Burke FJ; Lucarotti PS
J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 18819740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Examination of the polished surface of the amalgam filling materials Homodent-1 and Goodfill].
Szabó J; Herczegh B; Bánóczy J; Szabó I
Fogorv Sz; 1990 May; 83(5):133-8. PubMed ID: 2358094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Enamel remineralization on teeth adjacent to Class II glass ionomer restorations.
Segura A; Donly KJ; Stratmann RG
Am J Dent; 1997 Oct; 10(5):247-50. PubMed ID: 9522700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Marginal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in Class II conservative preparations.
Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
Quintessence Int; 2001 May; 32(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 11444073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fracture resistance of teeth with Class II bonded amalgam and new tooth-colored restorations.
Görücü J; Ozgünaltay G
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):501-7. PubMed ID: 14531594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An in vitro study on the use of circumferential matrix bands in the placement of Class II amalgam restorations.
Gilmour AS; James T; Bryant S; Gardner A; Stone D; Addy LD
Br Dent J; 2008 Mar; 204(6):E10; discussion 310-1. PubMed ID: 18297049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Marginal adaptation of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) compared with amalgam as a root-end filling material: a low-vacuum (LV) versus high-vacuum (HV) SEM study.
Shipper G; Grossman ES; Botha AJ; Cleaton-Jones PE
Int Endod J; 2004 May; 37(5):325-36. PubMed ID: 15086754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microleakage and adaptation of Class II packable resin-based composites using incremental or bulk filling techniques.
Gallo JR; Bates ML; Burgess JO
Am J Dent; 2000 Aug; 13(4):205-8. PubMed ID: 11763932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
