BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2776905)

  • 21. [The abrasion of composites in the region of the lateral teeth--results after 3 years].
    Roulet JF; Mettler P; Friedrich U
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1980 Apr; 35(4):493-7. PubMed ID: 6997011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [In vitro comparison of marginal adaptation of different filling materials. II. Effect of the site and method of preparation on the marginal adaptation].
    Köhalmi T; Gorzó I; Mari A; Boda K; Nagy K
    Fogorv Sz; 1999 Apr; 92(4):111-21. PubMed ID: 10334079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Randomized clinical comparison of endodontically treated teeth restored with amalgam or with fiber posts and resin composite: five-year results.
    Mannocci F; Qualtrough AJ; Worthington HV; Watson TF; Pitt Ford TR
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 15765952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of amalgam fillings on the mercury concentration in human amniotic fluid.
    Luglie PF; Campus G; Chessa G; Spano G; Capobianco G; Fadda GM; Dessole S
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2005 Feb; 271(2):138-42. PubMed ID: 14689312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study.
    Kavvadia K; Kakaboura A; Vanderas AP; Papagiannoulis L
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Characterization of dental fillings found in skulls from individuals buried in San Jeronimos Church, New Spain: historical and archaeological evidences.
    Mansilla J; Romero C; Bosch P; Leboreiro I; Pijoan C
    J Hist Dent; 2006; 54(2):45-52. PubMed ID: 17039860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Placement and replacement of amalgam restorations in Germany.
    Friedl KH; Hiller KA; Schmalz G
    Oper Dent; 1994; 19(6):228-32. PubMed ID: 9028243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Direct placement restorative materials for use in posterior teeth: the current options.
    Lyons K;
    N Z Dent J; 2003 Mar; 99(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 15330384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of bonded restorations on the fracture resistance of root filled teeth.
    Sagsen B; Aslan B
    Int Endod J; 2006 Nov; 39(11):900-4. PubMed ID: 17014529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of topical fluoride application before and after amalgam restoration placement on recurrent caries inhibition.
    Donly KJ; Stufflebeam M; García-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):151-3. PubMed ID: 10388367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Short-term evaluation of resin sealing and rebonding on amalgam microleakage: an SEM observation.
    Moosavi H; Sadeghi S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Mar; 9(3):32-9. PubMed ID: 18335117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Outcome of root canal treatment using Thermafil and cold lateral condensation filling techniques.
    Chu CH; Lo EC; Cheung GS
    Int Endod J; 2005 Mar; 38(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 15743421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cuspal deflection of maxillary premolars restored with bonded amalgam.
    el-Badrawy WA
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(6):337-43. PubMed ID: 10823082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessment of some elements in human permanent healthy teeth, their dependence on number of metallic amalgam fillings, and interelements relationships.
    Saber-Tehrani M; Givianrad MH; Kahkashan P
    Biol Trace Elem Res; 2007 May; 116(2):155-69. PubMed ID: 17646685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Fracture resistance of complex amalgam restorations.
    Burgess JO; Alvarez A; Summitt JB
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(3):128-32. PubMed ID: 9484151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Longevity of amalgam fillings in permanent teeth of minors].
    Hetzer G
    Stomatol DDR; 1989 Mar; 39(3):164-7. PubMed ID: 2815174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical aspects of restorative treatment in the primary dentition.
    Varpio M
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1993; 96():1-47. PubMed ID: 8310420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Longevity of conventional and bonded (sealed) amalgam restorations in a private general dental practice.
    Bonsor SJ; Chadwick RG
    Br Dent J; 2009 Jan; 206(2):E3; discussion 88-9. PubMed ID: 19148188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dentin adhesive superior to copal varnish in preventing microleakage in primary teeth.
    Royse MC; Ott NW; Mathieu GP
    Pediatr Dent; 1996; 18(7):440-3. PubMed ID: 8970205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.