These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27769172)

  • 1. Randomized controlled trials vs. observational studies: why not just live together?
    Faraoni D; Schaefer ST
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2016 Oct; 16(1):102. PubMed ID: 27769172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Observational studies - should we simply ignore them in assessing transfusion outcomes?
    Trentino K; Farmer S; Gross I; Shander A; Isbister J
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2016 Oct; 16(1):96. PubMed ID: 27741940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Designing clinical trials for amblyopia.
    Holmes JM
    Vision Res; 2015 Sep; 114():41-7. PubMed ID: 25752747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can the sum of pooled data from observational studies better evaluate outcome measures for therapies in coronary artery disease?
    Luthra S; Taggart DP
    Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2016; 14(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 26606523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The future of observational research and randomized controlled trials in red blood cell transfusion medicine.
    Vincent JL; Sakr Y; Lelubre C
    Shock; 2014 May; 41 Suppl 1():98-101. PubMed ID: 24662781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence-based medicine-When observational studies are better than randomized controlled trials.
    Bosdriesz JR; Stel VS; van Diepen M; Meuleman Y; Dekker FW; Zoccali C; Jager KJ
    Nephrology (Carlton); 2020 Oct; 25(10):737-743. PubMed ID: 32542836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The relevance of practice misalignments to trials in transfusion medicine.
    Deans KJ; Minneci PC; Klein HG; Natanson C
    Vox Sang; 2010 Jul; 99(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 20345517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Observational studies using propensity score analysis underestimated the effect sizes in critical care medicine.
    Zhang Z; Ni H; Xu X
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Aug; 67(8):932-9. PubMed ID: 24774469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Randomized clinical trials and observational studies in the assessment of drug safety.
    Sawchik J; Hamdani J; Vanhaeverbeek M
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2018 May; 66(3):217-225. PubMed ID: 29685700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Expanding the Evidence Base: Comparing Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies of Statins.
    Atar D; Ong S; Lansberg PJ
    Am J Ther; 2015; 22(5):e141-50. PubMed ID: 22487773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Observational studies in the era of randomized trials: finding the balance.
    Castillo RC; Scharfstein DO; MacKenzie EJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jul; 94 Suppl 1():112-7. PubMed ID: 22810460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The randomized controlled trial: gold standard, or merely standard?
    Grossman J; Mackenzie FJ
    Perspect Biol Med; 2005; 48(4):516-34. PubMed ID: 16227664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The limitations of observation studies for decision making regarding drugs efficacy and safety.
    Gueyffier F; Cucherat M
    Therapie; 2019 Apr; 74(2):181-185. PubMed ID: 30514576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Balancing the Evidence: How to Reconcile the Results of Observational Studies vs. Randomized Clinical Trials in Dialysis.
    Shen JI; Lum EL; Chang TI
    Semin Dial; 2016 Sep; 29(5):342-6. PubMed ID: 27207819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistical power in parallel group point exposure studies with time-to-event outcomes: an empirical comparison of the performance of randomized controlled trials and the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) approach.
    Austin PC; Schuster T; Platt RW
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Oct; 15():87. PubMed ID: 26472109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Alternatives to Randomised Controlled Trials for the Poor, the Impatient, and When Evaluating Emerging Technologies.
    Mani K; Björck M
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2019 Apr; 57(4):598-599. PubMed ID: 30509892
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Why do we continue to adopt medical practices based on pathophysiology alone when we should be insisting on clinical trials?
    Prasad V; Ho N
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Apr; 67(4):361-3. PubMed ID: 24581292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing validity of observational intervention studies - the Benchmarking Controlled Trials.
    Malmivaara A
    Ann Med; 2016 Sep; 48(6):440-443. PubMed ID: 27238631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Untapped Potential of Observational Research to Inform Clinical Decision Making: American Society of Clinical Oncology Research Statement.
    Visvanathan K; Levit LA; Raghavan D; Hudis CA; Wong S; Dueck A; Lyman GH
    J Clin Oncol; 2017 Jun; 35(16):1845-1854. PubMed ID: 28358653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.