These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
25. [New development of a bone cement which swells]. Seidel H; Polzhofer K Aktuelle Probl Chir Orthop; 1987; 31():354-7. PubMed ID: 2888384 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. 12 year results of a prospective trial comparing poly(methyl methacrylate) and poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) intraocular lenses. Khan AJ; Percival SP J Cataract Refract Surg; 1999 Oct; 25(10):1404-7. PubMed ID: 10511944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. New method of embedding the GMA, quetol 523 and methyl methacrylate for light and electron microscopic observation of semi-thin sections. Kushida T; Nagato Y; Kushida H Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn; 1981 May; 58(1):55-68. PubMed ID: 7024886 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. A new method for both light and electron microscopy of identical sites in semi-thin tissue sections embedded GMA, Quetol 523 and methyl methacrylate. Kushida H; Kushida T J Electron Microsc (Tokyo); 1981; 30(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 7288351 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Poly-HEMA as a material for intraocular lens implantation: a preliminary report. Packard RB; Garner A; Arnott EJ Br J Ophthalmol; 1981 Aug; 65(8):585-7. PubMed ID: 7295621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Results of the intercapsular technique with the IOGEL lens. Condon PI; Barrett GD; Kinsella M J Cataract Refract Surg; 1989 Sep; 15(5):495-503. PubMed ID: 2681685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effects of bacterial adhesion with respect to the type of material, structure and design of intraocular lenses. Alava JI; Garagorri N; Briz N; Mendicute J J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2005 Apr; 16(4):313-7. PubMed ID: 15803275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Activation of complement in human serum by some synthetic polymers used for intraocular lenses. Gobel RJ; Janatova J; Googe JM; Apple DJ Biomaterials; 1987 Jul; 8(4):285-8. PubMed ID: 3663806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Reduction in the area of the anterior capsule opening after polymethylmethacrylate, silicone, and soft acrylic intraocular lens implantation. Hayashi K; Hayashi H; Nakao F; Hayashi F Am J Ophthalmol; 1997 Apr; 123(4):441-7. PubMed ID: 9124240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of complement activation by silicone intraocular lenses and polymethylmethacrylate intraocular lenses with polypropylene loops. Mondino BJ; Rajacich GM; Sumner H Arch Ophthalmol; 1987 Jul; 105(7):989-90. PubMed ID: 3496873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Attachment of human oral fibroblasts to a granular polymeric implant for hard tissue replacement. Kamen PR J Oral Implantol; 1989; 15(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 2634779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of the effect of polymethylmethacrylate and silicone intraocular lenses on rabbit corneal endothelium in vitro. Herzog WR; Peiffer RL J Cataract Refract Surg; 1987 Jul; 13(4):397-400. PubMed ID: 3625517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Histology of anterior capsule opacification with a polyHEMA/HOHEXMA hydrophilic hydrogel intraocular lens compared to poly(methyl methacrylate), silicone, and acrylic lenses. Saika S; Miyamoto T; Ohnishi Y J Cataract Refract Surg; 2003 Jun; 29(6):1198-203. PubMed ID: 12842690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]