BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

409 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27769569)

  • 1. The quality of the reported sample size calculations in randomized controlled trials indexed in PubMed.
    Lee PH; Tse ACY
    Eur J Intern Med; 2017 May; 40():16-21. PubMed ID: 27769569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Methodological reporting quality of randomized controlled trials: A survey of seven core journals of orthopaedics from Mainland China over 5 years following the CONSORT statement.
    Zhang J; Chen X; Zhu Q; Cui J; Cao L; Su J
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2016 Nov; 102(7):933-938. PubMed ID: 27514437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Methodological reporting of randomized clinical trials in respiratory research in 2010.
    Lu Y; Yao Q; Gu J; Shen C
    Respir Care; 2013 Sep; 58(9):1546-51. PubMed ID: 23307824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quality of reporting in randomized trials published in high-quality surgical journals.
    Sinha S; Sinha S; Ashby E; Jayaram R; Grocott MP
    J Am Coll Surg; 2009 Nov; 209(5):565-571.e1. PubMed ID: 19854395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An assessment of the compliance of randomized controlled trials published in two high impact journals with the CONSORT statement.
    Susvirkar A; Gada P; Figer B; Thaker S; Thatte UM; Gogtay NJ
    Natl Med J India; 2018; 31(2):79-82. PubMed ID: 30829222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does the reporting of randomized clinical trials published in Chinese pediatrics journals improve after the CONSORT Statement is adopted?
    Ma B; Ke FY; Chen ZM; Qi GQ; Li HM; Liu WJ; Zhang Y; Hu Q; Yang KH
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2012 Sep; 33(5):889-94. PubMed ID: 22765929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnosis checking of statistical analysis in RCTs indexed in PubMed.
    Lee PH; Tse ACY
    Eur J Clin Invest; 2017 Nov; 47(11):847-852. PubMed ID: 28861912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pitfalls in reporting sample size calculation in randomized controlled trials published in leading anaesthesia journals: a systematic review.
    Abdulatif M; Mukhtar A; Obayah G
    Br J Anaesth; 2015 Nov; 115(5):699-707. PubMed ID: 26041717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: comparative study of articles indexed in PubMed.
    Hopewell S; Dutton S; Yu LM; Chan AW; Altman DG
    BMJ; 2010 Mar; 340():c723. PubMed ID: 20332510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Randomized controlled trials in non-pharmacological rehabilitation research: a scoping review of the reporting of sample size calculation, randomization procedure, and statistical analyses.
    Amiri M; Kumbhare D
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2020 Dec; 56(6):790-798. PubMed ID: 32935956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reporting quality of randomized controlled trials in otolaryngology: review of adherence to the CONSORT statement.
    Huang YQ; Traore K; Ibrahim B; Sewitch MJ; Nguyen LHP
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2018 May; 47(1):34. PubMed ID: 29764496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving Power and Sample Size Calculation in Rehabilitation Trial Reports: A Methodological Assessment.
    Castellini G; Gianola S; Bonovas S; Moja L
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2016 Jul; 97(7):1195-201. PubMed ID: 26971671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Features of acupuncture randomised controlled trials published in the top four journals].
    Zheng H; Liang FR; Li Y
    Zhongguo Zhen Jiu; 2010 Aug; 30(8):679-82. PubMed ID: 20942288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized clinical trials of surgical interventions.
    Hannink G; Gooszen HG; Rovers MM
    Ann Surg; 2013 May; 257(5):818-23. PubMed ID: 23407296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Information on adverse events in randomised clinical trials assessing drug interventions published in four medical journals with high impact factors.
    Maggi CB; Griebeler IH; Dal Pizzol Tda S
    Int J Risk Saf Med; 2014; 26(1):9-22. PubMed ID: 24796347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials in otorhinolaryngologic literature - adherence to the CONSORT statement.
    Peters JP; Hooft L; Grolman W; Stegeman I
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0122328. PubMed ID: 25793517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Standards for reporting randomized controlled trials in neurosurgery.
    Kiehna EN; Starke RM; Pouratian N; Dumont AS
    J Neurosurg; 2011 Feb; 114(2):280-5. PubMed ID: 21054137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does the CONSORT checklist for abstracts improve the quality of reports of randomized controlled trials on clinical pathways?
    Cui Q; Tian J; Song X; Yang K
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2014 Dec; 20(6):827-33. PubMed ID: 24916891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Journal impact factor and methodological quality of surgical randomized controlled trials: an empirical study.
    Ahmed Ali U; Reiber BMM; Ten Hove JR; van der Sluis PC; Gooszen HG; Boermeester MA; Besselink MG
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2017 Nov; 402(7):1015-1022. PubMed ID: 28578503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing quality of reports on randomized clinical trials in nursing journals.
    Parent N; Hanley JA
    Can J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2009; 19(2):25-39. PubMed ID: 19517902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.