These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2776958)
41. Trial of labor after cesarean delivery with a lower-segment, vertical uterine incision: is it safe? Naef RW; Ray MA; Chauhan SP; Roach H; Blake PG; Martin JN Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 172(6):1666-73; discussion 1673-4. PubMed ID: 7778619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. [Cesarean section in the lower uterine segment with suprapubic transverse resection of the anterior abdominal wall]. Markina VP Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1968 Jul; 44(7):54-7. PubMed ID: 5760913 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Type of Blunt Expansion of the Low Transverse Uterine Incision During Caesarean Section and the Risk of Postoperative Complications: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. Morales A; Reyes O; Cárdenas G J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2019 Mar; 41(3):306-311. PubMed ID: 30316719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Single versus double-layer uterine closure at cesarean: impact on lower uterine segment thickness at next pregnancy. Vachon-Marceau C; Demers S; Bujold E; Roberge S; Gauthier RJ; Pasquier JC; Girard M; Chaillet N; Boulvain M; Jastrow N Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jul; 217(1):65.e1-65.e5. PubMed ID: 28263751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. [Clinical study on 67 cases with uterine rupture]. Xiaoxia B; Zhengping W; Xiaofu Y Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2014 May; 49(5):331-5. PubMed ID: 25030728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Head pushing versus reverse breech extraction in cases of impacted fetal head during Cesarean section. Levy R; Chernomoretz T; Appelman Z; Levin D; Or Y; Hagay ZJ Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Jul; 121(1):24-6. PubMed ID: 15961214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The nonlaboring transverse lie. A management dilemma. Phelan JP; Boucher M; Mueller E; McCart D; Horenstein J; Clark SL J Reprod Med; 1986 Mar; 31(3):184-6. PubMed ID: 3701717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. [Cesarean section for fetal distress--is the decision interval for delivery significant?]. Tsankova M; Dimitrov A; Nikolov A; Krŭsteva K Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2005; 44 Suppl 3():24-7. PubMed ID: 16313082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Infectious morbidity, operative blood loss, and length of the operative procedure after cesarean delivery by method of placental removal and site of uterine repair. Magann EF; Washburne JF; Harris RL; Bass JD; Duff WP; Morrison JC J Am Coll Surg; 1995 Dec; 181(6):517-20. PubMed ID: 7582225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. TRANSVERSE PRESENTATION OF FETUS. JOHNSON CE JAMA; 1964 Feb; 187():642-6. PubMed ID: 14088443 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Maternal and neonatal outcomes after uterine rupture in labor. Yap OW; Kim ES; Laros RK Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Jun; 184(7):1576-81. PubMed ID: 11408884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Is internal podalic version a lost art? Optimum mode of delivery in transverse lie. Chauhan AR; Singhal TT; Raut VS J Postgrad Med; 2001; 47(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 11590284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. [Clinical study on vaginal birth after cesarean]. He L; Chen M; He GL; Liu XX Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Aug; 51(8):586-91. PubMed ID: 27561937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]