These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2776958)

  • 41. Trial of labor after cesarean delivery with a lower-segment, vertical uterine incision: is it safe?
    Naef RW; Ray MA; Chauhan SP; Roach H; Blake PG; Martin JN
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 172(6):1666-73; discussion 1673-4. PubMed ID: 7778619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Cesarean section in the lower uterine segment with suprapubic transverse resection of the anterior abdominal wall].
    Markina VP
    Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1968 Jul; 44(7):54-7. PubMed ID: 5760913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Type of Blunt Expansion of the Low Transverse Uterine Incision During Caesarean Section and the Risk of Postoperative Complications: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Morales A; Reyes O; Cárdenas G
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2019 Mar; 41(3):306-311. PubMed ID: 30316719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Single versus double-layer uterine closure at cesarean: impact on lower uterine segment thickness at next pregnancy.
    Vachon-Marceau C; Demers S; Bujold E; Roberge S; Gauthier RJ; Pasquier JC; Girard M; Chaillet N; Boulvain M; Jastrow N
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jul; 217(1):65.e1-65.e5. PubMed ID: 28263751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Lower Uterine Segment Trial: A pragmatic open multicenter randomized trial].
    Rozenberg P; Deruelle P; Sénat MV; Desbrière R; Winer N; Simon E; Ville Y; Kayem G; Boutron I;
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2018 Apr; 46(4):427-432. PubMed ID: 29625873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Variables influencing the integrity of lower uterine segment in post-cesarean pregnancy.
    Brahmalakshmy BL; Kushtagi P
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Apr; 291(4):755-62. PubMed ID: 25209351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Preliminary experience with a prospective protocol for planned vaginal delivery of triplet gestations.
    Alamia V; Royek AB; Jaekle RK; Meyer BA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Nov; 179(5):1133-5. PubMed ID: 9822488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Vaginal delivery in patients with a prior cesarean section.
    Lavin JP; Stephens RJ; Miodovnik M; Barden TP
    Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Feb; 59(2):135-48. PubMed ID: 7078857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. TRANSVERSE FOETAL LIE IN LABOUR.
    YATES MJ
    J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw; 1964 Apr; 71():245-8. PubMed ID: 14138386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Use of extraperitoneal cesarean section].
    Ivaniuta LI; Onyshko VIe; Neiezzhalova HA; Taranenko PP
    Pediatr Akus Ginekol; 1980; (2):50-2. PubMed ID: 7383731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Clinical study on 67 cases with uterine rupture].
    Xiaoxia B; Zhengping W; Xiaofu Y
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2014 May; 49(5):331-5. PubMed ID: 25030728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Head pushing versus reverse breech extraction in cases of impacted fetal head during Cesarean section.
    Levy R; Chernomoretz T; Appelman Z; Levin D; Or Y; Hagay ZJ
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Jul; 121(1):24-6. PubMed ID: 15961214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The nonlaboring transverse lie. A management dilemma.
    Phelan JP; Boucher M; Mueller E; McCart D; Horenstein J; Clark SL
    J Reprod Med; 1986 Mar; 31(3):184-6. PubMed ID: 3701717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Cesarean section for fetal distress--is the decision interval for delivery significant?].
    Tsankova M; Dimitrov A; Nikolov A; Krŭsteva K
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2005; 44 Suppl 3():24-7. PubMed ID: 16313082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Infectious morbidity, operative blood loss, and length of the operative procedure after cesarean delivery by method of placental removal and site of uterine repair.
    Magann EF; Washburne JF; Harris RL; Bass JD; Duff WP; Morrison JC
    J Am Coll Surg; 1995 Dec; 181(6):517-20. PubMed ID: 7582225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. TRANSVERSE PRESENTATION OF FETUS.
    JOHNSON CE
    JAMA; 1964 Feb; 187():642-6. PubMed ID: 14088443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Maternal and neonatal outcomes after uterine rupture in labor.
    Yap OW; Kim ES; Laros RK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Jun; 184(7):1576-81. PubMed ID: 11408884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Is internal podalic version a lost art? Optimum mode of delivery in transverse lie.
    Chauhan AR; Singhal TT; Raut VS
    J Postgrad Med; 2001; 47(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 11590284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Clinical study on vaginal birth after cesarean].
    He L; Chen M; He GL; Liu XX
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Aug; 51(8):586-91. PubMed ID: 27561937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Uterine tocolysis at cesarean breech delivery with epidural anesthesia.
    Ezra Y; Wade C; Rolbin SH; Farine D
    J Reprod Med; 2002 Jul; 47(7):555-8. PubMed ID: 12170532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.