125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2776987)
1. Comparison of the mastoid to vertex and mastoid to high forehead electrode arrays in recording auditory evoked potentials.
Kavanagh KT; Clark ST
Ear Hear; 1989 Aug; 10(4):259-61. PubMed ID: 2776987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of disposable ear canal electrodes in auditory brainstem response testing.
Ruth RA; Mills JA; Ferraro JA
Am J Otol; 1988 Jul; 9(4):310-5. PubMed ID: 3177615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Latency and amplitude effects of electrode placement on the early auditory evoked response.
Beattie RC; Beguwala FE; Mills DM; Boyd RL
J Speech Hear Disord; 1986 Feb; 51(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 3945061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of amplifier type (single-ended vs. differential) and electrode placement on early auditory evoked potentials.
Beattie RC; Taggart LA
Scand Audiol; 1987; 16(3):147-52. PubMed ID: 3432993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An improved technique for the non-invasive recording of auditory brain-stem responses with a specially constructed meatal electrode.
Lang AH; Happonen JM; Salmivalli A
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1981; 13():59-62. PubMed ID: 6944779
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Correlation study of two-channel recordings of the brain stem auditory evoked potential.
Durrant JD; Boston JR; Martin WH
Ear Hear; 1990 Jun; 11(3):215-21. PubMed ID: 2358133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bilateral recording of early auditory evoked responses in the cat.
Mair IW; Elverland HH; Laukli E
Hear Res; 1978 Oct; 1(1):11-23. PubMed ID: 757228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. ABR recordings in newborns using an ear canal electrode.
Gaddam A; Ferraro JA
Int J Audiol; 2008 Aug; 47(8):499-504. PubMed ID: 18698524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Electrode placement and mode of recording (differential vs. single-ended) effects on the early auditory-evoked response.
Beattie RC; Taggart LA
Audiology; 1989; 28(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 2923584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of ABR amplitudes with TIPtrode and mastoid electrodes.
Bauch CD; Olsen WO
Ear Hear; 1990 Dec; 11(6):463-7. PubMed ID: 2073982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dependence of the auditory brainstem response on electrode location.
Parker DJ
Arch Otolaryngol; 1981 Jun; 107(6):367-71. PubMed ID: 7224967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Using concha electrodes to measure cochlear microphonic waveforms and auditory brainstem responses.
Zhang M
Trends Amplif; 2010 Dec; 14(4):211-7. PubMed ID: 21131635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ear-canal compared to mastoid electrode placement in BRA.
Harder H; Arlinger S
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1981; 13():55-7. PubMed ID: 6944778
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Superiority of tympanic ball electrodes over mastoid needle electrodes for intraoperative monitoring of hearing function.
Krieg SM; Kempf L; Droese D; Rosahl SK; Meyer B; Lehmberg J
J Neurosurg; 2014 May; 120(5):1042-7. PubMed ID: 24559226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Auditory evoked responses in the rat: transverse mastoid needle electrodes register before cochlear nucleus and do not reflect later inferior colliculus activity.
Ping J; Li N; Du Y; Wu X; Li L; Galbraith G
J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Mar; 161(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 17109967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Investigation of the mastoid electrode contribution to the brain stem auditory evoked response.
Barratt H
Scand Audiol; 1980; 9(4):203-11. PubMed ID: 7466282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A study of auditory middle latency responses in relation to electrode combinations and stimulus conditions.
Kadobayashi I; Kira Y; Toyoshima A; Nishijima H
Audiology; 1984; 23(5):509-19. PubMed ID: 6487148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [An optimal electrode position for recording auditory evoked brain stem potentials within the scope of pediatric audiology].
Pethe J; Begall K; Mühler R; Smukalla K; von Specht H
Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 Mar; 77(3):131-5. PubMed ID: 9577818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of auditory brainstem response waveforms derived ipsilaterally and contralaterally to monaural stimulation.
Kato T; Shiraishi K; Imamura A; Kimura K; Morizono T; Soda T
Auris Nasus Larynx; 1995; 22(2):96-102. PubMed ID: 7487680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Phase reversal in brain stem responses: its use in the detection of asymmetry in the auditory pathways.
Prasher DK; Gibson WP
Audiology; 1981; 20(4):313-24. PubMed ID: 7259627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
