331 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27770228)
1. ESUR recommendations for MR imaging of the sonographically indeterminate adnexal mass: an update.
Forstner R; Thomassin-Naggara I; Cunha TM; Kinkel K; Masselli G; Kubik-Huch R; Spencer JA; Rockall A
Eur Radiol; 2017 Jun; 27(6):2248-2257. PubMed ID: 27770228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improving risk stratification of indeterminate adnexal masses on MRI: What imaging features help predict malignancy in O-RADS MRI 4 lesions?
Wong BZY; Causa Andrieu PI; Sonoda Y; Chi DS; Aviki EM; Vargas HA; Woo S
Eur J Radiol; 2023 Nov; 168():111122. PubMed ID: 37806193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MR imaging in discriminating between benign and malignant paediatric ovarian masses: a systematic review.
van Nimwegen LWE; Mavinkurve-Groothuis AMC; de Krijger RR; Hulsker CCC; Goverde AJ; Zsiros J; Littooij AS
Eur Radiol; 2020 Feb; 30(2):1166-1181. PubMed ID: 31529256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differentiation of benign from malignant adnexal masses by functional 3 tesla MRI techniques: diffusion-weighted imaging and time-intensity curves of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
Malek M; Pourashraf M; Mousavi AS; Rahmani M; Ahmadinejad N; Alipour A; Hashemi FS; Shakiba M
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(8):3407-12. PubMed ID: 25921153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. ESUR guidelines for MR imaging of the sonographically indeterminate adnexal mass: an algorithmic approach.
Spencer JA; Forstner R; Cunha TM; Kinkel K;
Eur Radiol; 2010 Jan; 20(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 20069737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging analysis of complex adnexal masses: a preliminary study.
Thomassin-Naggara I; Balvay D; Aubert E; Daraï E; Rouzier R; Cuenod CA; Bazot M
Eur Radiol; 2012 Apr; 22(4):738-45. PubMed ID: 22105841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantifying tumor vascular heterogeneity with DCE-MRI in complex adnexal masses: A preliminary study.
Thomassin-Naggara I; Soualhi N; Balvay D; Darai E; Cuenod CA
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Dec; 46(6):1776-1785. PubMed ID: 28370815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validity and Reproducibility of the ADNEX MR Scoring System in the Diagnosis of Sonographically Indeterminate Adnexal Masses.
Basha MAA; Abdelrahman HM; Metwally MI; Alayouty NA; Mohey N; Zaitoun MMA; Almassry HN; Yousef HY; El Sammak AA; Aly SA; Algazzar HY; Farag MAEM; Mosallam W; Abo Shanab WS; Ibrahim SA; Mohamed EA; Mohamed AEM; Afifi AHM; Harb OA; Azmy TM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Jan; 53(1):292-304. PubMed ID: 32715577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MRI of sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses.
Adusumilli S; Hussain HK; Caoili EM; Weadock WJ; Murray JP; Johnson TD; Chen Q; Desjardins B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Sep; 187(3):732-40. PubMed ID: 16928938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Adnexal masses: accuracy of detection and differentiation with multidetector computed tomography.
Tsili AC; Tsampoulas C; Charisiadi A; Kalef-Ezra J; Dousias V; Paraskevaidis E; Efremidis SC
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Jul; 110(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 18486202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Magnetic resonance evaluation of adnexal masses.
Guerra A; Cunha TM; Félix A
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):700-9. PubMed ID: 18568564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MR imaging of the sonographically indeterminate adnexal mass.
Spencer JA; Ghattamaneni S
Radiology; 2010 Sep; 256(3):677-94. PubMed ID: 20720065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Magnetic resonance scoring system for assessment of adnexal masses: added value of diffusion-weighted imaging including apparent diffusion coefficient map.
Hottat NA; Van Pachterbeke C; Vanden Houte K; Denolin V; Jani JC; Cannie MM
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 57(3):478-487. PubMed ID: 32438461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic Value of DCE-MRI for Differentiating Malignant Adnexal Masses Compared with Contrast-enhanced-T1WI.
Otani S; Kido A; Himoto Y; Sakata A; Otani T; Kuwahara R; Moribata Y; Nishio N; Yajima R; Nakao K; Kurata Y; Minamiguchi S; Mandai M; Nakamoto Y
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2022 Oct; 21(4):599-607. PubMed ID: 34483226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effectiveness of semi-quantitative multiphase dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI as a predictor of malignancy in complex adnexal masses: radiological and pathological correlation.
Bernardin L; Dilks P; Liyanage S; Miquel ME; Sahdev A; Rockall A
Eur Radiol; 2012 Apr; 22(4):880-90. PubMed ID: 22095438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. ADC-derived spatial features can accurately classify adnexal lesions.
Fathi Kazerooni A; Nabil M; Haghighat Khah H; Alviri M; Heidari-Sooreshjaani M; Gity M; Malek M; Saligheh Rad H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Apr; 47(4):1061-1071. PubMed ID: 28901638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Asymptomatic adnexal masses: correlation of FDG PET and histopathologic findings.
Fenchel S; Grab D; Nuessle K; Kotzerke J; Rieber A; Kreienberg R; Brambs HJ; Reske SN
Radiology; 2002 Jun; 223(3):780-8. PubMed ID: 12034950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Imaging strategy for early ovarian cancer: characterization of adnexal masses with conventional and advanced imaging techniques.
Mohaghegh P; Rockall AG
Radiographics; 2012 Oct; 32(6):1751-73. PubMed ID: 23065168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A one-step biomarker quantification methodology for DCE-MRI of adnexal masses: Capturing kinetic pattern from early to late enhancement.
Fathi Kazerooni A; Nabil M; Haghighat Khah H; Parviz S; Gity M; Saligheh Rad H
Magn Reson Med; 2018 Feb; 79(2):1165-1171. PubMed ID: 28480550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Differentiation of Benign from Malignant Adnexal Masses by Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI): Quantitative and Semi-quantitative analysis at 3-Tesla MRI.
Gity M; Parviz S; Saligheh Rad H; Fathi Kazerooni A; Shirali E; Shakiba M; Baikpour M
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Apr; 20(4):1073-1079. PubMed ID: 31030476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
