These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2777103)

  • 1. Contrast sensitivity versus static visual field testing during experimental elevation of intraocular pressure.
    Friberg TR; Sanborn GE; Budd R
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1989; 227(4):345-7. PubMed ID: 2777103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optic nerve dysfunction during gravity inversion. Visual field abnormalities.
    Sanborn GE; Friberg TR; Allen R
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1987 Jun; 105(6):774-6. PubMed ID: 3579708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual function-specific perimetry for indirect comparison of different ganglion cell populations in glaucoma.
    Sample PA; Bosworth CF; Blumenthal EZ; Girkin C; Weinreb RN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jun; 41(7):1783-90. PubMed ID: 10845599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relationship between visual field loss and contrast threshold elevation in glaucoma.
    Tochel CM; Morton JS; Jay JL; Morrison JD
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2005 Sep; 5():22. PubMed ID: 16159386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual field changes after transient elevation of intraocular pressure in eyes with and without glaucoma.
    Chan KC; Poostchi A; Wong T; Insull EA; Sachdev N; Wells AP
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Apr; 115(4):667-72. PubMed ID: 17716733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Structure and function evaluation (SAFE): I. criteria for glaucomatous visual field loss using standard automated perimetry (SAP) and short wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP).
    Johnson CA; Sample PA; Cioffi GA; Liebmann JR; Weinreb RN
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 134(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 12140023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Short-wavelength automated perimetry in low-, medium-, and high-risk ocular hypertensive eyes. Initial baseline results.
    Johnson CA; Brandt JD; Khong AM; Adams AJ
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1995 Jan; 113(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 7826296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Static threshold asymmetry in early glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Feuer WJ; Anderson DR
    Ophthalmology; 1989 Sep; 96(9):1285-97. PubMed ID: 2779996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intraocular pressure and progression of glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Martínez-Belló C; Chauhan BC; Nicolela MT; McCormick TA; LeBlanc RP
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2000 Mar; 129(3):302-8. PubMed ID: 10704544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm fast perimetry be used as an alternative to goldmann perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic practice?
    Szatmáry G; Biousse V; Newman NJ
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2002 Sep; 120(9):1162-73. PubMed ID: 12215089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Short wavelength automated perimetry, frequency doubling technology perimetry, and pattern electroretinography for prediction of progressive glaucomatous standard visual field defects.
    Bayer AU; Erb C
    Ophthalmology; 2002 May; 109(5):1009-17. PubMed ID: 11986111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Random dot motion perimetry in patients with glaucoma and in normal subjects.
    Wall M; Ketoff KM
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1995 Nov; 120(5):587-96. PubMed ID: 7485360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of manual kinetic and automated static perimetry in obtaining ptosis fields.
    Riemann CD; Hanson S; Foster JA
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2000 Jan; 118(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 10636416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Confrontation visual field loss as a function of decibel sensitivity loss on automated static perimetry. Implications on the accuracy of confrontation visual field testing.
    Shahinfar S; Johnson LN; Madsen RW
    Ophthalmology; 1995 Jun; 102(6):872-7. PubMed ID: 7777293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improvement of spatial contrast sensitivity threshold after surgical reduction of intraocular pressure in unilateral high-tension glaucoma.
    Gandolfi SA; Cimino L; Sangermani C; Ungaro N; Mora P; Tardini MG
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jan; 46(1):197-201. PubMed ID: 15623774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automated suprathreshold screening for glaucoma: the Baltimore Eye Survey.
    Katz J; Tielsch JM; Quigley HA; Javitt J; Witt K; Sommer A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1993 Nov; 34(12):3271-7. PubMed ID: 8225862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A clinical comparison of visual field testing with a new automated perimeter, the Humphrey Field Analyzer, and the Goldmann perimeter.
    Beck RW; Bergstrom TJ; Lichter PR
    Ophthalmology; 1985 Jan; 92(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 3974997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computerized visual field screening in the management of patients with ocular hypertension.
    Dyster-Aas K; Heijl A; Lundgvist L
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1980 Dec; 58(6):918-928. PubMed ID: 7331777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of Goldmann applanation tonometry on automated static threshold perimetry.
    Ruben JB; Lewis RA; Johnson CA; Adams C
    Ophthalmology; 1988 Feb; 95(2):267-70. PubMed ID: 2902545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured with optical coherence tomography is related to visual function in glaucomatous eyes.
    El Beltagi TA; Bowd C; Boden C; Amini P; Sample PA; Zangwill LM; Weinreb RN
    Ophthalmology; 2003 Nov; 110(11):2185-91. PubMed ID: 14597528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.