These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2777280)

  • 1. Electrode models for electric current computed tomography.
    Cheng KS; Isaacson D; Newell JC; Gisser DG
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1989 Sep; 36(9):918-24. PubMed ID: 2777280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Errors due to measuring voltage on current-carrying electrodes in electric current computed tomography.
    Cheng KS; Simske SJ; Isaacson D; Newell JC; Gisser DG
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1990 Jan; 37(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 2303271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography based on the complete electrode model.
    Vauhkonen PJ; Vauhkonen M; Savolainen T; Kaipio JP
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1999 Sep; 46(9):1150-60. PubMed ID: 10493078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of different stimulation and measurement patterns based on internal electrode: application in cardiac impedance tomography.
    Nasehi Tehrani J; Oh TI; Jin C; Thiagalingam A; McEwan A
    Comput Biol Med; 2012 Nov; 42(11):1122-32. PubMed ID: 23017828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of electrode area, contact impedance and boundary shape on EIT images.
    Boyle A; Adler A
    Physiol Meas; 2011 Jul; 32(7):745-54. PubMed ID: 21646710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using compound electrodes in electrical impedance tomography.
    Hua P; Woo EJ; Webster JG; Tompkins WJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Jan; 40(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 8468073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Finite element modeling of electrode-skin contact impedance in electrical impedance tomography.
    Hua P; Woo EJ; Webster JG; Tompkins WJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Apr; 40(4):335-43. PubMed ID: 8375870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new geometric factor for in situ resistivity measurement using four slender cylindrical electrodes.
    Chong CE; Tan YL
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Feb; 55(2 Pt 1):594-602. PubMed ID: 18269995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of the current-density distribution from a tapered, gelled-pad external cardiac pacing electrode.
    Williams CR; Geddes LA; Bourland JD; Furgason ES
    Med Instrum; 1987 Dec; 21(6):329-34. PubMed ID: 3431497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Frequency-dependent anisotropic modeling and analysis using mfEIT: A computer simulation study.
    Zhang T; Li R; Potter T; Seo JK; Li G; Zhang Y
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2018 Jul; 34(7):e2980. PubMed ID: 29521020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Shape deformation in two-dimensional electrical impedance tomography.
    Boyle A; Adler A; Lionheart WR
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2012 Dec; 31(12):2185-93. PubMed ID: 22711769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analytical solutions of electric potential and impedance for a multilayered spherical volume conductor excited by time-harmonic electric current source: application in brain EIT.
    Xiao C; Lei Y
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jun; 50(11):2663-74. PubMed ID: 15901961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Statistical estimation of resistance/conductance by electrical impedance tomography measurements.
    Demidenko E; Hartov A; Paulsen K
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Jul; 23(7):829-38. PubMed ID: 15250635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Induced-current electrical impedance tomography: a 2-D theoretical simulation.
    Zlochiver S; Rosenfeld M; Abboud S
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Dec; 22(12):1550-60. PubMed ID: 14649745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. RF tumour ablation: computer simulation and mathematical modelling of the effects of electrical and thermal conductivity.
    Lobo SM; Liu ZJ; Yu NC; Humphries S; Ahmed M; Cosman ER; Lenkinski RE; Goldberg W; Goldberg SN
    Int J Hyperthermia; 2005 May; 21(3):199-213. PubMed ID: 16019848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improvements and artifact analysis in conductivity images using multiple internal electrodes.
    Farooq A; Tehrani JN; McEwan AL; Woo EJ; Oh TI
    Physiol Meas; 2014 Jun; 35(6):1125-35. PubMed ID: 24845453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measuring Current Source Output Impedance in EIT Systems while Attached to a Load.
    Shishvan OR; Abdelwahab A; Saulnier GJ
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2020 Jul; 2020():1452-1456. PubMed ID: 33018264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rapid assessment of electrode characteristics for impedance imaging.
    Newell JC; Isaacson D; Gisser DG
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1990 Jul; 37(7):735-8. PubMed ID: 2394462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-dimensional reconstruction in electrical impedance tomography.
    Liu WP; Hua P; Webster JG
    Clin Phys Physiol Meas; 1988; 9 Suppl A():131-5. PubMed ID: 3240641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Complete electrode model in EEG: relationship and differences to the point electrode model.
    Pursiainen S; Lucka F; Wolters CH
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Feb; 57(4):999-1017. PubMed ID: 22297396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.