284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27773458)
1. Contrast-enhanced Spectral Mammography: Technique, Indications, and Clinical Applications.
Bhimani C; Matta D; Roth RG; Liao L; Tinney E; Brill K; Germaine P
Acad Radiol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):84-88. PubMed ID: 27773458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for intramammary cancer staging: preliminary results.
Blum KS; Rubbert C; Mathys B; Antoch G; Mohrmann S; Obenauer S
Acad Radiol; 2014 Nov; 21(11):1363-9. PubMed ID: 25127846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography as work-up tool in patients recalled from breast cancer screening has low risks and might hold clinical benefits.
Houben IPL; Van de Voorde P; Jeukens CRLPN; Wildberger JE; Kooreman LF; Smidt ML; Lobbes MBI
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Sep; 94():31-37. PubMed ID: 28941757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM).
James JJ; Tennant SL
Clin Radiol; 2018 Aug; 73(8):715-723. PubMed ID: 29937340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Staging of breast cancer and the advanced applications of digital mammogram: what the physician needs to know?
Helal MH; Mansour SM; Zaglol M; Salaleldin LA; Nada OM; Haggag MA
Br J Radiol; 2017 Mar; 90(1071):20160717. PubMed ID: 28055247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography in Comparison to Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Breast Lesions.
Xing D; Lv Y; Sun B; Xie H; Dong J; Hao C; Chen Q; Chi X
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2019; 43(2):245-251. PubMed ID: 30531546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced dual-energy spectral mammography (CESM): a retrospective study involving 644 breast lesions.
Travieso-Aja MDM; Maldonado-Saluzzi D; Naranjo-Santana P; Fernández-Ruiz C; Severino-Rondón W; Rodríguez Rodríguez M; Vega Benítez V; Pérez-Luzardo O
Radiol Med; 2019 Oct; 124(10):1006-1017. PubMed ID: 31250270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) versus breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): A retrospective comparison in 66 breast lesions.
Li L; Roth R; Germaine P; Ren S; Lee M; Hunter K; Tinney E; Liao L
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2017 Feb; 98(2):113-123. PubMed ID: 27687829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantification of enhancement in contrast-enhanced spectral mammography using a custom-made quantifier tool (I-STRIP): A proof-of-concept study.
Lobbes MBI; Mulder HKP; Rousch M; Backes WH; Wildberger JE; Jeukens CRLPN
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Sep; 106():114-121. PubMed ID: 30150032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in recalls from the Dutch breast cancer screening program: validation of results in a large multireader, multicase study.
Lalji UC; Houben IP; Prevos R; Gommers S; van Goethem M; Vanwetswinkel S; Pijnappel R; Steeman R; Frotscher C; Mok W; Nelemans P; Smidt ML; Beets-Tan RG; Wildberger JE; Lobbes MB
Eur Radiol; 2016 Dec; 26(12):4371-4379. PubMed ID: 27097789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: Does mammography provide additional clinical benefits or can some radiation exposure be avoided?
Fallenberg EM; Dromain C; Diekmann F; Renz DM; Amer H; Ingold-Heppner B; Neumann AU; Winzer KJ; Bick U; Hamm B; Engelken F
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2014 Jul; 146(2):371-81. PubMed ID: 24986697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography improves diagnostic accuracy in the symptomatic setting.
Tennant SL; James JJ; Cornford EJ; Chen Y; Burrell HC; Hamilton LJ; Girio-Fragkoulakis C
Clin Radiol; 2016 Nov; 71(11):1148-55. PubMed ID: 27296475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography in Women With Intermediate Breast Cancer Risk and Dense Breasts.
Sorin V; Yagil Y; Yosepovich A; Shalmon A; Gotlieb M; Neiman OH; Sklair-Levy M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Nov; 211(5):W267-W274. PubMed ID: 30240292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Adding the power of iodinated contrast media to the credibility of mammography in breast cancer diagnosis.
Tsigginou A; Gkali C; Chalazonitis A; Feida E; Vlachos DE; Zagouri F; Rellias I; Dimitrakakis C
Br J Radiol; 2016 Nov; 89(1067):20160397. PubMed ID: 27452266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in comparison to conventional full-field digital mammography in a population of women with dense breasts.
Mori M; Akashi-Tanaka S; Suzuki S; Daniels MI; Watanabe C; Hirose M; Nakamura S
Breast Cancer; 2017 Jan; 24(1):104-110. PubMed ID: 26942415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Angiomammography: A review of current evidences.
Dromain C; Vietti-Violi N; Meuwly JY
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2019 Oct; 100(10):593-605. PubMed ID: 30962168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the Mammography, Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography and Ultrasonography in a Group of 116 patients.
Luczyńska E; Heinze S; Adamczyk A; Rys J; Mitus JW; Hendrick E
Anticancer Res; 2016 Aug; 36(8):4359-66. PubMed ID: 27466557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of low-energy contrast-enhanced spectral mammography images by comparing them to full-field digital mammography using EUREF image quality criteria.
Lalji UC; Jeukens CR; Houben I; Nelemans PJ; van Engen RE; van Wylick E; Beets-Tan RG; Wildberger JE; Paulis LE; Lobbes MB
Eur Radiol; 2015 Oct; 25(10):2813-20. PubMed ID: 25813015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Classification of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) images.
Perek S; Kiryati N; Zimmerman-Moreno G; Sklair-Levy M; Konen E; Mayer A
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2019 Feb; 14(2):249-257. PubMed ID: 30367322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contrast Enhanced Spectral Mammography: A Review.
Patel BK; Lobbes MBI; Lewin J
Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2018 Feb; 39(1):70-79. PubMed ID: 29317041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
