178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27773873)
21. The laboratory impact of changing syphilis screening from the rapid-plasma reagin to a treponemal enzyme immunoassay: a case-study from the Greater Toronto Area.
Mishra S; Boily MC; Ng V; Gold WL; Okura T; Shaw M; Mazzulli T; Fisman DN
Sex Transm Dis; 2011 Mar; 38(3):190-6. PubMed ID: 20706176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Screening Veterans for Syphilis: Implementation of the Reverse Sequence Algorithm.
Clement ME; Hammouda A; Park LP; Maxwell J; Samoff E; Seña AC; Joyce M
Clin Infect Dis; 2017 Nov; 65(11):1930-1933. PubMed ID: 29020212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of a Rapid Syphilis Test in an Emergency Department Setting in Detroit, Michigan.
Fakile YF; Markowitz N; Zhu W; Mumby K; Dankerlui D; McCormick JK; Ham DC; Hopkins A; Manteuffel J; Sun Y; Huang YA; Peters PJ; Hoover KW
Sex Transm Dis; 2019 Jul; 46(7):429-433. PubMed ID: 30839394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparing the performance of traditional non-treponemal tests on syphilis and non-syphilis serum samples.
Gu WM; Yang Y; Wang QZ; Pan BS; Guo W; Wu L; Hu WZ; Yang S; Song BB; Zhang CY
Int J STD AIDS; 2013 Dec; 24(12):919-25. PubMed ID: 23970626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Cost effectiveness of enzyme immunoassay and immunoblot testing for the diagnosis of syphilis.
Chuck A; Ohinmaa A; Tilley P; Singh A; Jacobs P
Int J STD AIDS; 2008 Jun; 19(6):393-9. PubMed ID: 18595877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of an IgM/IgG sensitive enzyme immunoassay and the utility of index values for the screening of syphilis infection in a high-risk population.
Wong EH; Klausner JD; Caguin-Grygiel G; Madayag C; Barber KO; Qiu JS; Liska S; Pandori MW
Sex Transm Dis; 2011 Jun; 38(6):528-32. PubMed ID: 21233789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Recent Advances in Laboratory Diagnosis of Syphilis].
Zarakolu P
Mikrobiyol Bul; 2023 Jan; 57(1):141-155. PubMed ID: 36636853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of an automated rapid plasma reagin (RPR) test with the conventional RPR card test in syphilis testing.
Lee JH; Lim CS; Lee MG; Kim HS
BMJ Open; 2014 Dec; 4(12):e005664. PubMed ID: 25552608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Analysis of 2 Reverse Syphilis Testing Algorithms in Diagnosis of Syphilis: A Large-Cohort Prospective Study.
Peng J; Lu Y; Yu H; Wu S; Li T; Li H; Deng L; Sun Z
Clin Infect Dis; 2018 Aug; 67(6):947-953. PubMed ID: 30059969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. British Columbia's Experience after Implementation of the Treponema pallidum Reverse Algorithm and PCR Detection, 2015 to 2020.
Morshed M; Lee MK; Laley J; Cook D; Mak A; Chahil N; Ryan V; Montgomery C; Makaroff S; Malleson S; Arnold B; Grennan T; Wong J; Krajden M
Microbiol Spectr; 2022 Jun; 10(3):e0068622. PubMed ID: 35658597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Characterization of Treponema pallidum particle agglutination assay-negative sera following screening by treponemal total antibody enzyme immunoassays.
Maple PA; Ratcliffe D; Smit E
Clin Vaccine Immunol; 2010 Nov; 17(11):1718-22. PubMed ID: 20844087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Challenges of Rapid Plasma Reagin Interpretation in Syphilis Screening in Uganda: Variability in Nontreponemal Results Between Different Laboratories.
Hamill MM; Mbazira KJ; Kiragga AN; Gaydos CA; Jett-Goheen M; Parkes-Ratanshi R; Manabe YC; Nakku-Joloba E; Rompalo A
Sex Transm Dis; 2018 Dec; 45(12):829-833. PubMed ID: 29944643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Cost-effectiveness of a dual non-treponemal/treponemal syphilis point-of-care test to prevent adverse pregnancy outcomes in sub-Saharan Africa.
Owusu-Edusei K; Gift TL; Ballard RC
Sex Transm Dis; 2011 Nov; 38(11):997-1003. PubMed ID: 21992974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of the Bio-Rad BioPlex 2200 syphilis multiplex flow immunoassay for the detection of IgM- and IgG-class antitreponemal antibodies.
Gomez E; Jespersen DJ; Harring JA; Binnicker MJ
Clin Vaccine Immunol; 2010 Jun; 17(6):966-8. PubMed ID: 20427627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A multi-country comparative study of two treponemal tests for the serodiagnosis of syphilis amongst men who have sex with men (MSM): Chemo-luminescent assay vs Treponema pallidum particle agglutination assay.
Gios L; Mirandola M; Cordioli M; Zorzi A; Sherriff N; Vera J; Wlazly D; Hassan-Ibrahim MO; Padovese V; Anabel Darmanin ; Peeling RW; Unemo M; Blondeel K; Toskin I
BMC Infect Dis; 2024 Mar; 24(Suppl 1):313. PubMed ID: 38486194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of a new competitive immunoassay (BioElisa Syphilis) for screening for Treponema pallidum antibodies at various stages of syphilis.
Ebel A; Bachelart L; Alonso JM
J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Feb; 36(2):358-61. PubMed ID: 9466741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Evaluation of a syphilis testing algorithm using a treponemal test for screening].
Ozbek OA; Doğan Y
Mikrobiyol Bul; 2011 Jan; 45(1):93-103. PubMed ID: 21341164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of new algorithm using TPLA as an initial syphilis screening test.
Murai R; Yamada K; Yonezawa H; Yanagihara N; Takahashi S
J Infect Chemother; 2019 Jan; 25(1):68-70. PubMed ID: 30054230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Discordant Syphilis Immunoassays in Pregnancy: Perinatal Outcomes and Implications for Clinical Management.
Mmeje O; Chow JM; Davidson L; Shieh J; Schapiro JM; Park IU
Clin Infect Dis; 2015 Oct; 61(7):1049-53. PubMed ID: 26063719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of Traditional and Reverse Syphilis Screening Algorithms in Medical Health Checkups.
Nah EH; Cho S; Kim S; Cho HI; Chai JY
Ann Lab Med; 2017 Nov; 37(6):511-515. PubMed ID: 28840989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
