These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27774758)
1. A prospective evaluation of a standardized strategy for the use of a polymeric everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Rationale and design of the BVS STEMI STRATEGY-IT study. Ielasi A; Varricchio A; Campo G; Leoncini M; Cortese B; Vicinelli P; Brugaletta S; di Uccio FS; Latib A; Tespili M Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Jun; 89(7):1129-1138. PubMed ID: 27774758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Outcome of everolimus eluting bioabsorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) compared to non BVS drug eluting stent in the management of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) - A comparative study. Chakraborty R; Patra S; Banerjee S; Pande A; Khan A; Mandol PC; Ghosh D; De SK; Das SS; Nag R Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2016; 17(3):151-4. PubMed ID: 26905052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus everolimus-eluting metallic stent in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: 1-year results of a propensity score matching comparison: the BVS-EXAMINATION Study (bioresorbable vascular scaffold-a clinical evaluation of everolimus eluting coronary stents in the treatment of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction). Brugaletta S; Gori T; Low AF; Tousek P; Pinar E; Gomez-Lara J; Scalone G; Schulz E; Chan MY; Kocka V; Hurtado J; Gomez-Hospital JA; Münzel T; Lee CH; Cequier A; Valdés M; Widimsky P; Serruys PW; Sabaté M JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jan; 8(1 Pt B):189-197. PubMed ID: 25616924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Prospective Evaluation of a Pre-Specified Absorb BVS Implantation Strategy in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: The BVS STEMI STRATEGY-IT Study. Ielasi A; Campo G; Rapetto C; Varricchio A; Cortese B; Brugaletta S; Geraci S; Vicinelli P; Scotto di Uccio F; Secco GG; Poli A; Nicolini E; Ishida K; Latib A; Tespili M JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Sep; 10(18):1855-1864. PubMed ID: 28935077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mid- to Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Patients Treated With the Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold: The BVS Expand Registry. Felix CM; Fam JM; Diletti R; Ishibashi Y; Karanasos A; Everaert BR; van Mieghem NM; Daemen J; de Jaegere PP; Zijlstra F; Regar ES; Onuma Y; van Geuns RJ JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Aug; 9(16):1652-63. PubMed ID: 27476094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of Post-Dilatation Following Primary PCI With Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffold Versus Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stent Implantation: An Angiographic and Optical Coherence Tomography TROFI II Substudy. Yamaji K; Brugaletta S; Sabaté M; Iñiguez A; Jensen LO; Cequier A; Hofma SH; Christiansen EH; Suttorp M; van Es GA; Sotomi Y; Onuma Y; Serruys PW; Windecker S; Räber L JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Sep; 10(18):1867-1877. PubMed ID: 28935079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Neointimal coverage and late apposition of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds implanted in the acute phase of myocardial infarction: OCT data from the PRAGUE-19 study. Toušek P; Kočka V; Malý M; Lisa L; Buděšínský T; Widimský P Heart Vessels; 2016 Jun; 31(6):841-5. PubMed ID: 25896128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Versus Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stents: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials. Mahmoud AN; Barakat AF; Elgendy AY; Schneibel E; Mentias A; Abuzaid A; Elgendy IY Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 May; 10(5):. PubMed ID: 28468954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. One-Year Results Following a Pre-Specified ABSORB Implantation Strategy in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (BVS STEMI STRATEGY-IT Study). Ielasi A; Campo G; Cortese B; Leoncini M; Varricchio A; Brugaletta S; Favaretto E; Fineschi M; Piraino D; Calabria P; Granata F; Pisano F; Mussardo M; Latib A; Tespili M Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2019 Aug; 20(8):700-704. PubMed ID: 30314835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical outcomes of overlapping versus non-overlapping everolimus-eluting absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: An analysis from the multicentre prospective RAI registry (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02298413). Tarantini G; Mojoli M; Masiero G; Cortese B; Loi B; Varricchio A; Gabrielli G; Durante A; Pasquetto G; Calabrò P; Gistri R; Tumminello G; Misuraca L; Pisano F; Ielasi A; Mazzarotto P; Coscarelli S; Lucci V; Moretti L; Nicolino A; Colombo A; Olivari Z; Fineschi M; Piraino D; Piatti L; Canosi U; Tellaroli P; Corrado D; Rovera C; Steffenino G; Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jan; 91(1):E1-E16. PubMed ID: 28500737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Pt-Cr everolimus-eluting stent with bioabsorbable polymer in the treatment of patients with acute coronary syndromes. Results from the SYNERGY ACS registry. de la Torre Hernandez JM; Moreno R; Gonzalo N; Rivera R; Linares JA; Veiga Fernandez G; Gomez Menchero A; Garcia Del Blanco B; Hernandez F; Benito Gonzalez T; Subinas A; Escaned J Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2019 Aug; 20(8):705-710. PubMed ID: 30414798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bioresorbable Everolimus-Eluting Vascular Scaffold for Long Coronary Lesions: A Subanalysis of the International, Multicenter GHOST-EU Registry. Geraci S; Kawamoto H; Caramanno G; Ruparelia N; Capodanno D; Brugaletta S; Gori T; Nef H; Sabate M; Mehilli J; Lesiak M; Naber C; Di Mario C; Capranzano P; Wiebe J; Araszkiewicz A; Pyxaras S; Mattesini A; Münzel T; Tamburino C; Colombo A; Latib A JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Mar; 10(6):560-568. PubMed ID: 28259663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Second generation, sirolimus-eluting, bioresorbable Tyrocore scaffold implantation in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Baseline OCT and 30-day clinical outcomes - A FANTOM STEMI pilot study. Koltowski L; Tomaniak M; Ochijewicz D; Maksym J; Roleder T; Zaleska M; Proniewska K; Opolski G; Kochman J Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jul; 96(1):E1-E7. PubMed ID: 31343827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Procedural resources utilization and clinical outcomes with bioresorbable everolimus-eluting scaffolds and Pt-Cr everolimus-eluting stent with resorbable abluminal polymer in clinical practice. A randomized trial. de la Torre Hernandez JM; Garcia Camarero T; Lee DH; Sainz Laso F; Veiga Fernandez G; Pino T; Rubio S; Legarra P; Valdivia JR; Zueco Gil J Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Aug; 90(2):E25-E30. PubMed ID: 27807948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A randomized comparison of novel bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent and durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent in patients with acute coronary syndromes: The CENTURY II high risk ACS substudy. Jiménez VA; Iñiguez A; Baz JA; Valdés M; Ortiz A; Vuilliomenet A; Mainar V; Dudek D; Banai S; Tüller D; Bonnet JL; De Miguel A; Bastos G; Wijns W; Saito S Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2016 Sep; 17(6):355-61. PubMed ID: 27156201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Midterm clinical outcomes with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds versus everolimus-eluting metallic stents for percutaneous coronary interventions: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Cassese S; Byrne RA; Jüni P; Wykrzykowska JJ; Puricel S; Ndrepepa G; Schunkert H; Fusaro M; Cook S; Kimura T; Henriques JPS; Serruys PW; Windecker S; Kastrati A EuroIntervention; 2018 Jan; 13(13):1565-1573. PubMed ID: 28671552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]