These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2777526)

  • 1. A comparison of dual-energy digital radiography and screen-film imaging in the detection of subtle interstitial pulmonary disease.
    Barnes GT; Sabbagh EA; Chakraborty DP; Nath PH; Luna RF; Sanders C; Fraser RG
    Invest Radiol; 1989 Aug; 24(8):585-91. PubMed ID: 2777526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A ROC study of AMBER and conventional chest imaging in the detection of simulated interstitial lung disease.
    van Schelven IH; Winter LH; Chakraborty DP; Schultze Kool LJ
    Eur J Radiol; 1995 Nov; 21(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 8654463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy of digital radiography for the detection of pneumothorax: comparison with conventional chest radiography.
    Elam EA; Rehm K; Hillman BJ; Maloney K; Fajardo LL; McNeill K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Mar; 158(3):509-14. PubMed ID: 1738985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interpretation of subtle interstitial chest abnormalities: conventional radiography versus high-resolution storage-phosphor radiography--a preliminary study.
    Ikezoe J; Kohno N; Kido S; Takeuchi N; Johkoh T; Arisawa J; Kozuka T
    J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):31-6. PubMed ID: 7734537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Receiver-operating-characteristic study of chest radiographs in children: digital hard-copy film vs 2K x 2K soft-copy images.
    Razavi M; Sayre JW; Taira RK; Simons M; Huang HK; Chuang KS; Rahbar G; Kangarloo H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Feb; 158(2):443-8. PubMed ID: 1729805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of optimization and image processing in digital chest radiography: an ROC study with an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Kheddache S; Månsson LG; Angelhed JE; Denbratt L; Gottfridsson B; Schlossman D
    Eur J Radiol; 1991; 13(2):143-50. PubMed ID: 1743193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography for detection of simulated nodules and interstitial disease in a chest phantom.
    Kroft LJ; Geleijns J; Mertens BJ; Veldkamp WJ; Zonderland HM; de Roos A
    Radiology; 2004 Apr; 231(1):156-63. PubMed ID: 14990807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. High frequency edge enhancement in the detection of fine pulmonary lines. Parity between storage phosphor digital images and conventional chest radiography.
    Oestmann JW; Greene R; Rubens JR; Pile-Spellman E; Hall D; Robertson C; Llewellyn HJ; McCarthy KA; Potsaid M; White G
    Invest Radiol; 1989 Sep; 24(9):643-6. PubMed ID: 2807816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs.
    Floyd CE; Baker JA; Chotas HG; Delong DM; Ravin CE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1353-8. PubMed ID: 7484562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital luminescence radiography in interstitial lung disease. A receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis.
    Kehler M; Albrechtsson U; Andrésdóttir A; Brådvik I; Hochbergs P; Lárusdóttir H; Lundin A
    Acta Radiol; 1991 Jan; 32(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 2012723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.
    Kimme-Smith C; Aberle DR; Sayre JW; Hart EM; Greaves SM; Brown K; Young DA; Deseran MD; Johnson T; Johnson SL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Signal detection in digital chest-phantom images acquired with an image intensifier.
    Brauer GW; Fisher PD; Hanley JA; Ritchie GW
    J Digit Imaging; 1989 Feb; 2(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 2488152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. "Single-exposure" dual energy digital radiography in the detection of pulmonary nodules and calcifications.
    Oestmann JW; Greene R; Rhea JT; Rosenthal H; Koenker RM; Tillotson CL; Pearsen KD; Hill JW; Velaj RH
    Invest Radiol; 1989 Jul; 24(7):517-21. PubMed ID: 2753645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnostic performance of a prototype dual-energy chest imaging system ROC analysis.
    Kashani H; Varon CA; Paul NS; Gang GJ; Van Metter R; Yorkston J; Siewerdsen JH
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Mar; 17(3):298-308. PubMed ID: 20042351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital chest radiography with a large image intensifier. An ROC study with an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Månsson LG; Kheddache S; Börjesson J; Mattsson S; Schlossman D
    Eur J Radiol; 1989 Nov; 9(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 2591385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography: comparison of image quality in a phantom study.
    Veldkamp WJ; Kroft LJ; Mertens BJ; Geleijns J
    Radiology; 2005 Jun; 235(3):857-66. PubMed ID: 15845787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Digital chest imaging using a 57-cm image intensifier: a receiver-operating characteristic study of user performance.
    Brauer GW; Fisher PD; Pengelly DB; Ritchie GW
    J Digit Imaging; 1990 May; 3(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 2092815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to contrast and spatial resolution in tissue equivalent breast phantoms.
    Kuzmiak CM; Pisano ED; Cole EB; Zeng D; Burns CB; Roberto C; Pavic D; Lee Y; Seo BK; Koomen M; Washburn D
    Med Phys; 2005 Oct; 32(10):3144-50. PubMed ID: 16279068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Nodular lesions simulated on an anthropomorphic thoracic phantom. A comparison between analog and digital images of the thorax].
    Miceli M; Stamati R; Burci P; Sartoni Galloni S; Guidarelli G; Pastori R
    Radiol Med; 1993; 85(1-2):54-8. PubMed ID: 8480049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Chest radiography: depiction of normal anatomy and pathologic structures with selenium-based digital radiography versus conventional screen-film radiography.
    Woodard PK; Slone RM; Gierada DS; Reiker GG; Pilgram TK; Jost RG
    Radiology; 1997 Apr; 203(1):197-201. PubMed ID: 9122392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.