These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27775404)

  • 1. Conceptual match as a determinant of reference reuse in dialogue.
    Knutsen D; Le Bigot L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Mar; 43(3):350-368. PubMed ID: 27775404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of reference acceptance and reuse on conversational memory traces.
    Knutsen D; Le Bigot L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Mar; 41(2):574-85. PubMed ID: 24999705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Generating References in Naturalistic Face-to-Face and Phone-Mediated Dialog Settings.
    Knutsen D; Ros C; Le Bigot L
    Top Cogn Sci; 2016 Oct; 8(4):796-818. PubMed ID: 27541074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adjusting conceptual pacts in three-party conversation.
    Yoon SO; Brown-Schmidt S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jul; 40(4):919-37. PubMed ID: 24707779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Readers routinely represent implied object rotation: the role of visual experience.
    Wassenburg SI; Zwaan RA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Sep; 63(9):1665-70. PubMed ID: 20845232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The automatic visual simulation of words: A memory reactivated mask slows down conceptual access.
    Rey AE; Riou B; Vallet GT; Versace R
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2017 Mar; 71(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 27455062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Capturing egocentric biases in reference reuse during collaborative dialogue.
    Knutsen D; Le Bigot L
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Dec; 21(6):1590-9. PubMed ID: 24671777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Developmental changes in children's understanding of the similarity between photographs and their referents.
    Uttal DH; Gentner D; Liu LL; Lewis AR
    Dev Sci; 2008 Jan; 11(1):156-70. PubMed ID: 18171376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is overall similarity classification less effortful than single-dimension classification?
    Wills AJ; Milton F; Longmore CA; Hester S; Robinson J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(2):299-318. PubMed ID: 22897383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of conceptual processing on familiarity-based recognition.
    Ngo CT; Brown A; Sargent J; Dopkins S
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2010 Mar; 64(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 20384421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can color changes alter the neural correlates of recognition memory? Manipulation of processing affects an electrophysiological indicator of conceptual implicit memory.
    Cui X; Gao C; Zhou J; Guo C
    Neuroreport; 2016 Sep; 27(14):1037-45. PubMed ID: 27489100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neural correlates of familiarity and conceptual fluency in a recognition test with ancient pictographic characters.
    Hou M; Safron A; Paller KA; Guo C
    Brain Res; 2013 Jun; 1518():48-60. PubMed ID: 23632379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conceptual priming and familiarity: different expressions of memory during recognition testing with distinct neurophysiological correlates.
    Voss JL; Lucas HD; Paller KA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Nov; 22(11):2638-51. PubMed ID: 19702474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reading comprehension in aging: the role of working memory and metacomprehension.
    De Beni R; Borella E; Carretti B
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2007 Mar; 14(2):189-212. PubMed ID: 17364380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lexical factors in conceptual processes: The relationship between semantic representations and their corresponding phonological and orthographic lexical forms.
    Peleg O; Edelist L; Eviatar Z; Bergerbest D
    Mem Cognit; 2016 May; 44(4):519-37. PubMed ID: 26637339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of visual context during the production of referring expressions.
    Fukumura K; van Gompel RP; Pickering MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Sep; 63(9):1700-15. PubMed ID: 20127548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Eyetracking reveals multiple-category use in induction.
    Chen SY; Ross BH; Murphy GL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jul; 42(7):1050-67. PubMed ID: 26727126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of linguistic and cognitive factors on the time course of verb-based implicit causality.
    Koornneef A; Dotlačil J; van den Broek P; Sanders T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(3):455-81. PubMed ID: 26031765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Developmental differences in explicit and implicit conceptual memory tests: a processing view account.
    Sauzéon H; Déjos M; Lestage P; Arvind Pala P; N'kaoua B
    Child Neuropsychol; 2012; 18(1):23-49. PubMed ID: 21500114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relationship between extensions and intensions in categorization: A match made in heaven?
    Djalal FM; Hampton JA; Storms G; Heyman T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Apr; 44(4):655-666. PubMed ID: 29083202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.