These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2777606)

  • 1. [Stress protection in plate osteosynthesis: myth or reality?].
    Cordey J; Perren SM; Steinemann S
    Helv Chir Acta; 1989 Jun; 56(1-2):235-9. PubMed ID: 2777606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical considerations in plate osteosynthesis: the effect of plate-to-bone compression with and without angular screw stability.
    Stoffel K; Lorenz KU; Kuster MS
    J Orthop Trauma; 2007 Jul; 21(6):362-8. PubMed ID: 17620993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Less rigid internal fixation plates: historical perspectives and new concepts.
    Woo SL; Lothringer KS; Akeson WH; Coutts RD; Woo YK; Simon BR; Gomez MA
    J Orthop Res; 1984; 1(4):431-49. PubMed ID: 6491792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Analysis and experimental study of reasons for breakage in the bone fracture plate during internal fixation].
    Luo M; Feng Z; Tang G; Ma H
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2001 Sep; 18(3):428-31. PubMed ID: 11605508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stress analyses after femoral shaft osteotomy fixed by various plates with different rigidities in simulation test.
    Xu XX; Zhang X; Liu JG; Wang JB; Shi DG; Liu SX
    Chin Med J (Engl); 1993 Feb; 106(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 8504696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Supracondylar femur fracture fixation: mechanical comparison of the 95 degrees condylar side plate and screw versus 95 degrees angled blade plate.
    Jaakkola JI; Lundy DW; Moore T; Jones B; Ganey TM; Hutton WC
    Acta Orthop Scand; 2002 Jan; 73(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 11928916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are locking screws advantageous with plate fixation of humeral shaft fractures? A biomechanical analysis of synthetic and cadaveric bone.
    O'Toole RV; Andersen RC; Vesnovsky O; Alexander M; Topoleski LD; Nascone JW; Sciadini MF; Turen C; Eglseder WA
    J Orthop Trauma; 2008; 22(10):709-15. PubMed ID: 18978547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new approach to the design of internal fixation plates.
    Woo SL; Simon BR; Akeson WH; Gomez MA; Seguchi Y
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1983 May; 17(3):427-39. PubMed ID: 6863347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of plate rotation on the stiffness of femoral LISS: a mechanical study.
    Khalafi A; Curtiss S; Hazelwood S; Wolinsky P
    J Orthop Trauma; 2006 Sep; 20(8):542-6. PubMed ID: 16990725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical analysis of distal femur fracture fixation: fixed-angle screw-plate construct versus condylar blade plate.
    Higgins TF; Pittman G; Hines J; Bachus KN
    J Orthop Trauma; 2007 Jan; 21(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 17211268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical comparison of two different periarticular plating systems for stabilization of complex distal humerus fractures.
    Schwartz A; Oka R; Odell T; Mahar A
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Nov; 21(9):950-5. PubMed ID: 16782245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An experimental study of devices for internal fixation of distal femoral fractures.
    Kolmert L; Persson BM; Romanus B
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1982; (171):290-9. PubMed ID: 7140081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Polyaxial locking plate fixation in distal femur fractures: a biomechanical comparison.
    Wilkens KJ; Curtiss S; Lee MA
    J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Oct; 22(9):624-8. PubMed ID: 18827592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A short plate compression screw with diagonal bolts--a biomechanical evaluation performed experimentally and by numerical computation.
    Peleg E; Mosheiff R; Liebergall M; Mattan Y
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Nov; 21(9):963-8. PubMed ID: 16893595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A mechanical comparison of the locking compression plate (LCP) and the low contact-dynamic compression plate (DCP) in an osteoporotic bone model.
    Snow M; Thompson G; Turner PG
    J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Feb; 22(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 18349780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Plate-bone friction in the compression fixation of fractures.
    Hayes WC; Perren SM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1972; 89():236-40. PubMed ID: 4646262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stress protection due to plates: myth or reality? A parametric analysis made using the composite beam theory.
    Cordey J; Perren SM; Steinemann SG
    Injury; 2000 Sep; 31 Suppl 3():C1-13. PubMed ID: 11052375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mechanical characteristics of locking and compression plate constructs applied dorsally to distal radius fractures.
    Boswell S; McIff TE; Trease CA; Toby EB
    J Hand Surg Am; 2007; 32(5):623-9. PubMed ID: 17481999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Experimental research into the stability of bone plate osteosynthesis as a function of the initial stress in animals].
    Diehl K; Harms J; Hanser U; Mittelmeier H
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1979 Aug; 117(4):710-2. PubMed ID: 506425
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of metacarpal plating methods.
    Sohn RC; Jahng KH; Curtiss SB; Szabo RM
    J Hand Surg Am; 2008 Mar; 33(3):316-21. PubMed ID: 18343284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.