These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27776224)

  • 1. From face processing to face recognition: Comparing three different processing levels.
    Besson G; Barragan-Jason G; Thorpe SJ; Fabre-Thorpe M; Puma S; Ceccaldi M; Barbeau EJ
    Cognition; 2017 Jan; 158():33-43. PubMed ID: 27776224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Distinct neural processes for the perception of familiar versus unfamiliar faces along the visual hierarchy revealed by EEG.
    Collins E; Robinson AK; Behrmann M
    Neuroimage; 2018 Nov; 181():120-131. PubMed ID: 29966716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How Fast is Famous Face Recognition?
    Barragan-Jason G; Lachat F; Barbeau EJ
    Front Psychol; 2012; 3():454. PubMed ID: 23162503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is the Thatcher Illusion Modulated by Face Familiarity? Evidence from an Eye Tracking Study.
    Utz S; Carbon CC
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0163933. PubMed ID: 27776145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. 3D faces are recognized more accurately and faster than 2D faces, but with similar inversion effects.
    Eng ZHD; Yick YY; Guo Y; Xu H; Reiner M; Cham TJ; Chen SHA
    Vision Res; 2017 Sep; 138():78-85. PubMed ID: 28687329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tolerance for distorted faces: challenges to a configural processing account of familiar face recognition.
    Sandford A; Burton AM
    Cognition; 2014 Sep; 132(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 24853629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of inversion and eye displacements of familiar and unknown faces on early and late-stage ERPs.
    Caharel S; Fiori N; Bernard C; Lalonde R; Rebaï M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Oct; 62(1):141-51. PubMed ID: 16678927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Self-face recognition is characterized by "bilateral gain" and by faster, more accurate performance which persists when faces are inverted.
    Keyes H; Brady N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 May; 63(5):840-7. PubMed ID: 20198537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of inversion and familiarity on face versus body cues to person recognition.
    Robbins RA; Coltheart M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Oct; 38(5):1098-104. PubMed ID: 22642217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High familiar faces have both eye recognition and holistic processing advantages.
    Wang Z; Wu T; Zhang W; Deng W; Li Y; Zhang L; Sun YP; Jin H
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Oct; 85(7):2296-2306. PubMed ID: 37794299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The neural speed of familiar face recognition.
    Barragan-Jason G; Cauchoix M; Barbeau EJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():390-401. PubMed ID: 26100560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Familiar Face Detection in 180 ms.
    Visconti di Oleggio Castello M; Gobbini MI
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0136548. PubMed ID: 26305788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interplay between familiarity and orientation in face processing: an ERP study.
    Marzi T; Viggiano MP
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Sep; 65(3):182-92. PubMed ID: 17512996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inversion Impairs Expert Budgerigar Identity Recognition: A Face-Like Effect for a Nonface Object of Expertise.
    Campbell A; Tanaka JW
    Perception; 2018 Jun; 47(6):647-659. PubMed ID: 29690836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A familiarity disadvantage for remembering specific images of faces.
    Armann RG; Jenkins R; Burton AM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Apr; 42(4):571-80. PubMed ID: 26594877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Familiarity facilitates feature-based face processing.
    Visconti di Oleggio Castello M; Wheeler KG; Cipolli C; Gobbini MI
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178895. PubMed ID: 28582439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tolerance to spatial-relational transformations in unfamiliar faces: A further challenge to a configural processing account of identity recognition.
    Lorenzino M; Caminati M; Caudek C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Jul; 188():25-38. PubMed ID: 29807303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Familiarity effects on categorization levels of faces and objects.
    Anaki D; Bentin S
    Cognition; 2009 Apr; 111(1):144-9. PubMed ID: 19217085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Qualitative Impairment in Face Perception in Alzheimer's Disease: Evidence from a Reduced Face Inversion Effect.
    Lavallée MM; Gandini D; Rouleau I; Vallet GT; Joannette M; Kergoat MJ; Busigny T; Rossion B; Joubert S
    J Alzheimers Dis; 2016; 51(4):1225-36. PubMed ID: 26967217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Socially Important Faces Are Processed Preferentially to Other Familiar and Unfamiliar Faces in a Priming Task across a Range of Viewpoints.
    Keyes H; Zalicks C
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0156350. PubMed ID: 27219101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.