These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27776224)

  • 21. Inverted faces are (eventually) processed holistically.
    Richler JJ; Mack ML; Palmeri TJ; Gauthier I
    Vision Res; 2011 Feb; 51(3):333-42. PubMed ID: 21130798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Attention to individual identities modulates face processing.
    Ruz M; Aranda C; Sarmiento BR; Sanabria D
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 May; 233(5):1491-502. PubMed ID: 25690863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Self- or familiar-face recognition advantage? New insight using ambient images.
    Bortolon C; Lorieux S; Raffard S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Jun; 71(6):1396-1404. PubMed ID: 28486055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The speed of recognition of personally familiar faces.
    Ramon M; Caharel S; Rossion B
    Perception; 2011; 40(4):437-49. PubMed ID: 21805919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Inversion and contrast polarity reversal affect both encoding and recognition processes of unfamiliar faces: a repetition study using ERPs.
    Itier RJ; Taylor MJ
    Neuroimage; 2002 Feb; 15(2):353-72. PubMed ID: 11798271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Information processing during face recognition: the effects of familiarity, inversion, and morphing on scanning fixations.
    Barton JJ; Radcliffe N; Cherkasova MV; Edelman J; Intriligator JM
    Perception; 2006; 35(8):1089-105. PubMed ID: 17076068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Personal familiarity enhances sensitivity to horizontal structure during processing of face identity.
    Pachai MV; Sekuler AB; Bennett PJ; Schyns PG; Ramon M
    J Vis; 2017 Jun; 17(6):5. PubMed ID: 28593249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The generality of the attentional boost effect for famous, unfamiliar, and inverted faces.
    Oliver GW; Lee VG
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Feb; 31(1):234-241. PubMed ID: 37537318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Role of Familiarity for Representations in Norm-Based Face Space.
    Faerber SJ; Kaufmann JM; Leder H; Martin EM; Schweinberger SR
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0155380. PubMed ID: 27168323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Outlining face processing skills of portrait artists: Perceptual experience with faces predicts performance.
    Devue C; Barsics C
    Vision Res; 2016 Oct; 127():92-103. PubMed ID: 27507580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Understanding face familiarity.
    Kramer RSS; Young AW; Burton AM
    Cognition; 2018 Mar; 172():46-58. PubMed ID: 29232594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The face inversion effect or the face upright effect?
    Gerlach C; Kühn CD; Mathiassen AB; Kristensen CL; Starrfelt R
    Cognition; 2023 Mar; 232():105335. PubMed ID: 36446285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Orientation effects support specialist processing of upright unfamiliar faces in children and adults.
    Ewing L; Mares I; Edwards SG; Smith ML
    Dev Psychol; 2023 Jun; 59(6):1109-1115. PubMed ID: 36095246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Spatiotemporal changes in neural response patterns to faces varying in visual familiarity.
    Natu VS; O'Toole AJ
    Neuroimage; 2015 Mar; 108():151-9. PubMed ID: 25524650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Early electrophysiological correlates of adaptation to personally familiar and unfamiliar faces across viewpoint changes.
    Caharel S; Jacques C; d'Arripe O; Ramon M; Rossion B
    Brain Res; 2011 Apr; 1387():85-98. PubMed ID: 21362409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Visual expertise for horses in a case of congenital prosopagnosia.
    Weiss N; Mardo E; Avidan G
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Mar; 83():63-75. PubMed ID: 26231978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Electrophysiological neural mechanisms for detection, configural analysis and recognition of faces.
    Anaki D; Zion-Golumbic E; Bentin S
    Neuroimage; 2007 Oct; 37(4):1407-16. PubMed ID: 17689102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Perception of novel faces: the parts have it!
    Lobmaier JS; Mast FW
    Perception; 2007; 36(11):1660-73. PubMed ID: 18265846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Categorical perception effects for facial identity in robustly represented familiar and self-faces: the role of configural and featural information.
    Keyes H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(4):760-72. PubMed ID: 22248095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Recovery from adaptation to facial identity is larger for upright than inverted faces in the human occipito-temporal cortex.
    Mazard A; Schiltz C; Rossion B
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(6):912-22. PubMed ID: 16229867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.