These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27776617)

  • 1. How response bias affects the factorial structure of personality self-reports.
    Navarro-González D; Lorenzo-Seva U; Vigil-Colet A
    Psicothema; 2016 Nov; 28(4):465-470. PubMed ID: 27776617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of ageing on self-reported aggression measures are partly explained by response bias.
    Vigil-Colet A; Lorenzo-Seva U; Morales-Vives F
    Psicothema; 2015; 27(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 26260926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How social desirability and acquiescence affect the age-personality relationship.
    Vigil-Colet A; Morales-Vives F; Lorenzo-Seva U
    Psicothema; 2013; 25(3):342-8. PubMed ID: 23910749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. I-DAQ: a new test to assess direct and indirect aggression free of response bias.
    Ruiz-Pamies M; Lorenzo-Seva U; Morales-Vives F; Cosi S; Vigil-Colet A
    Span J Psychol; 2014; 17():E41. PubMed ID: 25011484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of social desirability on psychometric measures of aggression.
    Vigil-Colet A; Ruiz-Pamies M; Anguiano-Carrasco C; Lorenzo-Seva U
    Psicothema; 2012 May; 24(2):310-5. PubMed ID: 22420362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of acquiescence on the evaluation of personality structure.
    Rammstedt B; Farmer RF
    Psychol Assess; 2013 Dec; 25(4):1137-45. PubMed ID: 23815112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development and validation of the Overall Personality Assessment Scale (OPERAS).
    Vigil-Colet A; Morales-Vives F; Camps E; Tous J; Lorenzo-Seva U
    Psicothema; 2013 Feb; 25(1):100-6. PubMed ID: 23336551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of classical and modern methods for measuring and correcting for acquiescence.
    Primi R; Santos D; De Fruyt F; John OP
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2019 Nov; 72(3):447-465. PubMed ID: 31032894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantifying the Association of Self-Enhancement Bias With Self-Ratings of Personality and Life Satisfaction.
    Leising D; Locke KD; Kurzius E; Zimmermann J
    Assessment; 2016 Oct; 23(5):588-602. PubMed ID: 26092044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. To reverse or to not reverse Likert-type items: That is the question.
    Vigil-Colet A; Navarro-González D; Morales-Vives F
    Psicothema; 2020 Feb; 32(1):108-114. PubMed ID: 31954423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [An IRT assessment of Rotter's I-E scale: a new approach and some considerations].
    Ferrando PJ; Demestre J; Anguiano-Carrasco C; Chico E
    Psicothema; 2011 Apr; 23(2):282-8. PubMed ID: 21504682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Validation study of the French schizotypal personality questionnaire in a sample of adolescents: a confirmatory factor analysis].
    Badoud D; Chanal J; Van der Linden M; Eliez S; Debbané M
    Encephale; 2011 Sep; 37(4):299-307. PubMed ID: 21981891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Socially Desirable Responding in Web-Based Questionnaires: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Candor Hypothesis.
    Gnambs T; Kaspar K
    Assessment; 2017 Sep; 24(6):746-762. PubMed ID: 26739360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Socially desirable responding and its elusive effects on the validity of personality assessments.
    Paunonen SV; LeBel EP
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2012 Jul; 103(1):158-75. PubMed ID: 22564012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Random intercept EFA of personality scales.
    Aichholzer J
    J Res Pers; 2014 Dec; 53():1-4. PubMed ID: 25484472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using reversed items in Likert scales: A questionable practice.
    Suárez-Álvarez J; Pedrosa I; Lozano LM; García-Cueto E; Cuesta M; Muñiz J
    Psicothema; 2018 May; 30(2):149-158. PubMed ID: 29694314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Controlling social desirability may attenuate faking effects: a study with aggression measures.
    Anguiano-Carrasco C; Vigil-Colet A; Ferrando PJ
    Psicothema; 2013; 25(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 23628529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. SOCIAL DESIRABILITY AND ACQUIESCENCE IN RESPONSE TO PERSONALITY ITEMS.
    DIERS CJ
    J Consult Psychol; 1964 Feb; 28():71-7. PubMed ID: 14121181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Social desirability and sexual offenders: a review.
    Tan L; Grace RC
    Sex Abuse; 2008 Mar; 20(1):61-87. PubMed ID: 18420557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Marlowe-Crowne affair: short forms, psychometric structure, and social desirability.
    Barger SD
    J Pers Assess; 2002 Oct; 79(2):286-305. PubMed ID: 12425392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.