BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

535 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27776658)

  • 1. Replacing single-view mediolateral oblique (MLO) digital mammography (DM) with synthesized mammography (SM) with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) images: Comparison of the diagnostic performance and radiation dose with two-view DM with or without MLO-DBT.
    Kang HJ; Chang JM; Lee J; Song SE; Shin SU; Kim WH; Bae MS; Moon WK
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Nov; 85(11):2042-2048. PubMed ID: 27776658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative evaluation of average glandular dose and breast cancer detection between single-view digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) plus single-view digital mammography (DM) and two-view DM: correlation with breast thickness and density.
    Shin SU; Chang JM; Bae MS; Lee SH; Cho N; Seo M; Kim WH; Moon WK
    Eur Radiol; 2015 Jan; 25(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 25182628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is there any added value to substitute the 2D digital MLO projection for a MLO tomosynthesis projection and its synthetic view when a 2D standard digital mammography is used in a one-stop-shop immediate reading mammography screening?
    Mesurolle B; El Khoury M; Travade A; Bagard C; Pétrou A; Monghal C
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Dec; 31(12):9529-9539. PubMed ID: 34047846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Combination of one-view digital breast tomosynthesis with one-view digital mammography versus standard two-view digital mammography: per lesion analysis.
    Gennaro G; Hendrick RE; Toledano A; Paquelet JR; Bezzon E; Chersevani R; di Maggio C; La Grassa M; Pescarini L; Polico I; Proietti A; Baldan E; Pomerri F; Muzzio PC
    Eur Radiol; 2013 Aug; 23(8):2087-94. PubMed ID: 23620367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. One-view digital breast tomosynthesis as a stand-alone modality for breast cancer detection: do we need more?
    Rodriguez-Ruiz A; Gubern-Merida A; Imhof-Tas M; Lardenoije S; Wanders AJT; Andersson I; Zackrisson S; Lång K; Dustler M; Karssemeijer N; Mann RM; Sechopoulos I
    Eur Radiol; 2018 May; 28(5):1938-1948. PubMed ID: 29230524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Breast Cancer Conspicuity on Simultaneously Acquired Digital Mammographic Images versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images.
    Korhonen KE; Conant EF; Cohen EA; Synnestvedt M; McDonald ES; Weinstein SP
    Radiology; 2019 Jul; 292(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 31084481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of average glandular dose and investigation of the relationship with compressed breast thickness in dual energy contrast enhanced digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Fusco R; Raiano N; Raiano C; Maio F; Vallone P; Mattace Raso M; Setola SV; Granata V; Rubulotta MR; Barretta ML; Petrosino T; Petrillo A
    Eur J Radiol; 2020 May; 126():108912. PubMed ID: 32151787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of prior mammograms on combined reading of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Kim WH; Chang JM; Koo HR; Seo M; Bae MS; Lee J; Moon WK
    Acta Radiol; 2017 Feb; 58(2):148-155. PubMed ID: 27178032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Synthetic 2-Dimensional Mammography Can Replace Digital Mammography as an Adjunct to Wide-Angle Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Clauser P; Baltzer PAT; Kapetas P; Woitek R; Weber M; Leone F; Bernathova M; Helbich TH
    Invest Radiol; 2019 Feb; 54(2):83-88. PubMed ID: 30281557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Average glandular dose in paired digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis acquisitions in a population based screening program: effects of measuring breast density, air kerma and beam quality.
    Østerås BH; Skaane P; Gullien R; Martinsen ACT
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jan; 63(3):035006. PubMed ID: 29311416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. One view or two views for wide-angle tomosynthesis with synthetic mammography in the assessment setting?
    Clauser P; Baltzer PAT; Kapetas P; Woitek R; Weber M; Leone F; Bernathova M; Helbich TH
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Jan; 32(1):661-670. PubMed ID: 34324025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis in Breast Cancer Screening: The Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial.
    Skaane P; Bandos AI; Niklason LT; Sebuødegård S; Østerås BH; Gullien R; Gur D; Hofvind S
    Radiology; 2019 Apr; 291(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 30777808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of synthesized two-dimensional mammography and full-field digital mammography alone or in combination with digital breast tomosynthesis.
    You C; Zhang Y; Gu Y; Xiao Q; Liu G; Shen X; Yang W; Peng W
    Breast Cancer; 2020 Jan; 27(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 31302894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance comparison of single-view digital breast tomosynthesis plus single-view digital mammography with two-view digital mammography.
    Gennaro G; Hendrick RE; Ruppel P; Chersevani R; di Maggio C; La Grassa M; Pescarini L; Polico I; Proietti A; Baldan E; Bezzon E; Pomerri F; Muzzio PC
    Eur Radiol; 2013 Mar; 23(3):664-72. PubMed ID: 22976919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multicenter Evaluation of Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Combination with Synthetic versus Digital Mammography.
    Zuckerman SP; Sprague BL; Weaver DL; Herschorn SD; Conant EF
    Radiology; 2020 Dec; 297(3):545-553. PubMed ID: 33048032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reader performances in breast lesion characterization via DBT: One or two views and which view?
    Boisselier A; Mandoul C; Monsonis B; Delebecq J; Millet I; Pages E; Taourel P
    Eur J Radiol; 2021 Sep; 142():109880. PubMed ID: 34358811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Digital breast tomosynthesis plus mammography, magnetic resonance imaging plus mammography and mammography alone: A comparison of diagnostic performance in symptomatic women.
    Tang W; Hu FX; Zhu H; Wang QF; Gu YJ; Peng WJ
    Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2017; 66(2):105-116. PubMed ID: 28211806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breast Digital Tomosynthesis versus Contrast-Enhanced Mammography: Comparison of Diagnostic Application and Radiation Dose in a Screening Setting.
    Nicosia L; Bozzini AC; Pesapane F; Rotili A; Marinucci I; Signorelli G; Frassoni S; Bagnardi V; Origgi D; De Marco P; Abiuso I; Sangalli C; Balestreri N; Corso G; Cassano E
    Cancers (Basel); 2023 Apr; 15(9):. PubMed ID: 37173880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of radiologists' experience on breast cancer detection and localization using digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Alakhras MM; Brennan PC; Rickard M; Bourne R; Mello-Thoms C
    Eur Radiol; 2015 Feb; 25(2):402-9. PubMed ID: 25192796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of different exposure parameters on radiation dose in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: A phantom study.
    Asbeutah AM; Brindhaban A; AlMajran AA; Asbeutah SA
    Radiography (Lond); 2020 Aug; 26(3):e129-e133. PubMed ID: 32052759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.