These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27776671)

  • 1. Submillisievert coronary calcium quantification using model-based iterative reconstruction: A within-patient analysis.
    den Harder AM; Wolterink JM; Willemink MJ; Schilham AMR; de Jong PA; Budde RPJ; Nathoe HM; Išgum I; Leiner T
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Nov; 85(11):2152-2159. PubMed ID: 27776671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction on Agatston Coronary Artery Calcium Scores in Comparison to Filtered Back Projection in Native Cardiac CT.
    Obmann VC; Klink T; Heverhagen JT; Stork A; Laqmani A; Adam G; Begemann PG
    Rofo; 2015 May; 187(5):372-9. PubMed ID: 25962672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Determining the radiation dose reduction potential for coronary calcium scanning with computed tomography: an anthropomorphic phantom study comparing filtered backprojection and the adaptive iterative dose reduction algorithm for image reconstruction.
    Blobel J; Mews J; Schuijf JD; Overlaet W
    Invest Radiol; 2013 Dec; 48(12):857-62. PubMed ID: 23917328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of Coronary Artery Calcium on Low-Dose Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography With Iterative Reconstruction.
    Braber TL; Willemink MJ; Bohté EH; Mosterd A; Leiner T; Velthuis BK
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2016; 40(2):266-71. PubMed ID: 26720203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiation dose reduction at coronary artery calcium scoring by using a low tube current technique and hybrid iterative reconstruction.
    Matsuura N; Urashima M; Fukumoto W; Sunamori H; Tatsugami F; Toyota N; Awai K
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(1):119-24. PubMed ID: 25319604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Approaches to ultra-low radiation dose coronary artery calcium scoring based on 3rd generation dual-source CT: A phantom study.
    McQuiston AD; Muscogiuri G; Schoepf UJ; Meinel FG; Canstein C; Varga-Szemes A; Cannao' PM; Wichmann JL; Allmendinger T; Vliegenthart R; De Cecco CN
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 26724647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Finding the optimal dose reduction and iterative reconstruction level for coronary calcium scoring.
    Willemink MJ; den Harder AM; Foppen W; Schilham AM; Rienks R; Laufer EM; Nieman K; de Jong PA; Budde RP; Nathoe HM; Leiner T
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 26342405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Iterative beam-hardening correction with advanced modeled iterative reconstruction in low voltage CT coronary calcium scoring with tin filtration: Impact on coronary artery calcium quantification and image quality.
    Tesche C; De Cecco CN; Schoepf UJ; Duguay TM; Albrecht MH; Caruso D; Varga-Szemes A; Lesslie VW; Ebersberger U; Canstein C; Thilo C; Hoffmann E; Allmendinger T; Nance JW
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(5):354-359. PubMed ID: 28756086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of CT radiation dose reduction and iterative reconstruction algorithms from four different vendors on coronary calcium scoring.
    Willemink MJ; Takx RA; de Jong PA; Budde RP; Bleys RL; Das M; Wildberger JE; Prokop M; Buls N; de Mey J; Schilham AM; Leiner T
    Eur Radiol; 2014 Sep; 24(9):2201-12. PubMed ID: 24889996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Iterative image reconstruction techniques for CT coronary artery calcium quantification: comparison with traditional filtered back projection in vitro and in vivo.
    Schindler A; Vliegenthart R; Schoepf UJ; Blanke P; Ebersberger U; Cho YJ; Allmendinger T; Vogt S; Raupach R; Fink C; Saam T; Bamberg F; Nikolaou K; Apfaltrer P
    Radiology; 2014 Feb; 270(2):387-93. PubMed ID: 24471388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prospective evaluation of the influence of iterative reconstruction on the reproducibility of coronary calcium quantification in reduced radiation dose 320 detector row CT.
    Choi AD; Leifer ES; Yu J; Shanbhag SM; Bronson K; Arai AE; Chen MY
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(5):359-63. PubMed ID: 27591767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. CT coronary calcium scoring with tin filtration using iterative beam-hardening calcium correction reconstruction.
    Tesche C; De Cecco CN; Schoepf UJ; Duguay TM; Albrecht MH; De Santis D; Varga-Szemes A; Lesslie VW; Ebersberger U; Bayer RR; Canstein C; Hoffmann E; Allmendinger T; Nance JW
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Jun; 91():29-34. PubMed ID: 28629567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Influence of Iterative Reconstruction on Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring-Phantom and Clinical Studies.
    Oda S; Utsunomiya D; Nakaura T; Funama Y; Yuki H; Kidoh M; Hirata K; Taguchi N; Honda K; Takaoka H; Iyama Y; Katahira K; Noda K; Oshima S; Tokuyasu S; Yamashita Y
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Mar; 24(3):295-301. PubMed ID: 27913107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of iterative model reconstruction on coronary artery calcium quantification.
    Szilveszter B; Elzomor H; Károlyi M; Kolossváry M; Raaijmakers R; Benke K; Celeng C; Bartykowszki A; Bagyura Z; Lux Á; Merkely B; Maurovich-Horvat P
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jan; 32(1):153-60. PubMed ID: 26285899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. High-pitch low-voltage CT coronary artery calcium scoring with tin filtration: accuracy and radiation dose reduction.
    Apfaltrer G; Albrecht MH; Schoepf UJ; Duguay TM; De Cecco CN; Nance JW; De Santis D; Apfaltrer P; Eid MH; Eason CD; Thompson ZM; Bauer MJ; Varga-Szemes A; Jacobs BE; Sorantin E; Tesche C
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Jul; 28(7):3097-3104. PubMed ID: 29404770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques in quantifying coronary calcium.
    Takahashi M; Kimura F; Umezawa T; Watanabe Y; Ogawa H
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 26276567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Submillisievert Radiation Dose Coronary CT Angiography: Clinical Impact of the Knowledge-Based Iterative Model Reconstruction.
    Iyama Y; Nakaura T; Kidoh M; Oda S; Utsunomiya D; Sakaino N; Tokuyasu S; Osakabe H; Harada K; Yamashita Y
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Nov; 23(11):1393-1401. PubMed ID: 27665234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Systematic assessment of coronary calcium detectability and quantification on four generations of CT reconstruction techniques: a patient and phantom study.
    Dobrolinska MM; van Praagh GD; Oostveen LJ; Poelhekken K; Greuter MJW; Fleischmann D; Willemink MJ; de Lange F; Slart RHJA; Leiner T; van der Werf NR
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2023 Jan; 39(1):221-231. PubMed ID: 36598691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3D Integrated with Automatic Tube Current Modulation for CT Coronary Artery Calcium Quantification: Comparison to Traditional Filtered Back Projection in an Anthropomorphic Phantom and Patients.
    Tang YC; Liu YC; Hsu MY; Tsai HY; Chen CM
    Acad Radiol; 2018 Aug; 25(8):1010-1017. PubMed ID: 29395796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of low-dose coronary artery calcium scoring using low tube current technique and hybrid iterative reconstruction vs. filtered back projection.
    Sulaiman N; Soon J; Park JK; Naoum C; Kueh SH; Blanke P; Murphy D; Ellis J; Hague CJ; Leipsic J
    Clin Imaging; 2017; 43():19-23. PubMed ID: 28167282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.