These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2777678)

  • 1. Field matching considerations in craniospinal irradiation.
    Tatcher M; Glicksman AS
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1989 Oct; 17(4):865-9. PubMed ID: 2777678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of set-up error on the dose across the junction of matching cranial-spinal fields in the treatment of medulloblastoma.
    Holupka EJ; Humm JL; Tarbell NJ; Svensson GK
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1993 Sep; 27(2):345-52. PubMed ID: 8407409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Are moving junctions in craniospinal irradiation for medulloblastoma really necessary?
    Tinkler SD; Lucraft HH
    Br J Radiol; 1995 Jul; 68(811):736-9. PubMed ID: 7640929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dosimetric comparison between proton and photon beams in the moving gap region in cranio-spinal irradiation (CSI).
    Cheng CW; Das IJ; Srivastava SP; Zhao L; Wolanski M; Simmons J; Johnstone PA; Buchsbaum JC
    Acta Oncol; 2013 Apr; 52(3):553-60. PubMed ID: 22554342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A simple technique for cranio-spinal irradiation in pediatric patients.
    Prabhakar R; Haresh KP; Munshi A; Sridhar PS; Subramani V; Julka PK; Rath GK
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2009; 5(2):113-5. PubMed ID: 19542667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dose profiles in the region of abutting photon and electron fields in the irradiation of head and neck tumors.
    Sun C; Cheng CW; Shimm DS; Cassady JR
    Med Dosim; 1998; 23(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 9586711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Technical note: dosimetry in the moving gap region in craniospinal irradiation.
    Cheng CW; Das IJ; Chen DJ
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Oct; 67(802):1017-22. PubMed ID: 8000826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Irradiation of the whole neuraxis. A method for field positioning.
    Tenhunen M; Usenius T; Lahtinen T
    Acta Oncol; 1994; 33(6):661-5. PubMed ID: 7946445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A simple technique for craniospinal radiotherapy in the supine position.
    Parker WA; Freeman CR
    Radiother Oncol; 2006 Feb; 78(2):217-22. PubMed ID: 16330119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Supine craniospinal irradiation using intrafractional junction shifts and field-in-field dose shaping: early experience at Methodist Hospital.
    South M; Chiu JK; Teh BS; Bloch C; Schroeder TM; Paulino AC
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Jun; 71(2):477-83. PubMed ID: 18164864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Verification techniques and dose distribution for computed tomographic planned supine craniospinal radiation therapy.
    Chang EL; Wong PF; Forster KM; Petru MD; Kowalski AV; Maor MH
    Med Dosim; 2003; 28(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 12804712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A single-gradient junction technique to replace multiple-junction shifts for craniospinal irradiation treatment.
    Hadley A; Ding GX
    Med Dosim; 2014; 39(4):314-9. PubMed ID: 24913466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of field placement errors on dose at junction between divergence matching and half-beam block techniques in craniospinal irradiation.
    Cakir A; Bilge H; Küçücük H; Okutan M; Fayda EM; Darendeliler E
    J BUON; 2002; 7(4):361-4. PubMed ID: 17955581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The cranial-spinal junction in medulloblastoma: does it matter?
    Narayana A; Jeswani S; Paulino AC
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Apr; 44(1):81-4. PubMed ID: 10219798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A low gradient junction technique of craniospinal irradiation using volumetric-modulated arc therapy and its advantages over the conventional therapy.
    Sarkar B; Munshi A; Manikandan A; Roy S; Ganesh T; Mohanti BK; Pradhan A
    Cancer Radiother; 2018 Feb; 22(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 29195796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Modern three-dimensional conformal craniospinal radiotherapy].
    Sebestyén Z; Kovács P; Gulybán A; Farkas R; Bellyei S; Szigeti A; Gallainé DF; Mangel L
    Magy Onkol; 2011 Sep; 55(3):187-92. PubMed ID: 21918744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Practical dose delivery verification of craniospinal IMRT.
    Lee YK; Kim AT; Zhao P; Karotki A
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 16(6):76-83. PubMed ID: 26699557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Craniospinal radiotherapy in an advanced technique.
    Christ G; Denninger D; Dohm OS; Weigel B; Hönes A; Paulsen F
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2008 Oct; 184(10):530-5. PubMed ID: 19016043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Treatment planning with protons for pediatric retinoblastoma, medulloblastoma, and pelvic sarcoma: how do protons compare with other conformal techniques?
    Lee CT; Bilton SD; Famiglietti RM; Riley BA; Mahajan A; Chang EL; Maor MH; Woo SY; Cox JD; Smith AR
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):362-72. PubMed ID: 16168831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of integral dose in cranio-spinal axis (CSA) irradiation with conventional and helical delivery.
    Peñagarícano JA; Shi C; Ratanatharathorn V
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2005 Dec; 4(6):683-9. PubMed ID: 16292889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.