These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
414 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27777116)
1. Digital preservation of anatomical variation: 3D-modeling of embalmed and plastinated cadaveric specimens using uCT and MRI. Moore CW; Wilson TD; Rice CL Ann Anat; 2017 Jan; 209():69-75. PubMed ID: 27777116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation by medical students of the educational value of multi-material and multi-colored three-dimensional printed models of the upper limb for anatomical education. Mogali SR; Yeong WY; Tan HKJ; Tan GJS; Abrahams PH; Zary N; Low-Beer N; Ferenczi MA Anat Sci Educ; 2018 Jan; 11(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 28544582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Take away body parts! An investigation into the use of 3D-printed anatomical models in undergraduate anatomy education. Smith CF; Tollemache N; Covill D; Johnston M Anat Sci Educ; 2018 Jan; 11(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 28753247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Coupled physical and digital cadaver dissection followed by a visual test protocol provides insights into the nature of anatomical knowledge and its evaluation. Hisley KC; Anderson LD; Smith SE; Kavic SM; Tracy JK Anat Sci Educ; 2008 Jan; 1(1):27-40. PubMed ID: 19177376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 3D-Printed specimens as a valuable tool in anatomy education: A pilot study. Garas M; Vaccarezza M; Newland G; McVay-Doornbusch K; Hasani J Ann Anat; 2018 Sep; 219():57-64. PubMed ID: 29883617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computer aided three-dimensional reconstruction and modeling of the pelvis, by using plastinated cross sections, as a powerful tool for morphological investigations. Sora MC; Jilavu R; Matusz P Surg Radiol Anat; 2012 Oct; 34(8):731-6. PubMed ID: 21861157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Learning relational anatomy by correlating thin plastinated sections and magnetic resonance images: preparation of specimens. Magiros M; Kekic M; Doran GA Acta Anat (Basel); 1997; 158(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 9293295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The use of plastinated prosections for teaching anatomy--the view of medical students on the value of this learning resource. Fruhstorfer BH; Palmer J; Brydges S; Abrahams PH Clin Anat; 2011 Mar; 24(2):246-52. PubMed ID: 21322047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of traditional versus three-dimensional augmented curriculum on anatomical learning outcome measures. Peterson DC; Mlynarczyk GS Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Nov; 9(6):529-536. PubMed ID: 27078503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The production of anatomical teaching resources using three-dimensional (3D) printing technology. McMenamin PG; Quayle MR; McHenry CR; Adams JW Anat Sci Educ; 2014; 7(6):479-86. PubMed ID: 24976019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Effects of a Functional Three-dimensional (3D) Printed Knee Joint Simulator in Improving Anatomical Spatial Knowledge. Cai B; Rajendran K; Bay BH; Lee J; Yen CC Anat Sci Educ; 2019 Nov; 12(6):610-618. PubMed ID: 30536570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Resin-embedded anatomical cross-sections as a teaching adjunct for medical curricula: is this technique an alternative to potting and plastination? Chisholm F; Varsou O J Anat; 2018 Jul; 233(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 29663381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Learning anatomy through Thiel- vs. formalin-embalmed cadavers: Student perceptions of embalming methods and effect on functional anatomy knowledge. Kennel L; Martin DMA; Shaw H; Wilkinson T Anat Sci Educ; 2018 Mar; 11(2):166-174. PubMed ID: 28719722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Application of three-dimensional reconstruction and printing as an elective course for undergraduate medical students: an exploratory trial. Zhang X; Xu Z; Tan L; Li Y; Liu L; Chen N; Zhang S; Lamers WH; Wu C; Wu Y Surg Radiol Anat; 2019 Oct; 41(10):1193-1204. PubMed ID: 31030233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transforming clinical imaging data for virtual reality learning objects. Trelease RB; Rosset A Anat Sci Educ; 2008; 1(2):50-5. PubMed ID: 19177381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stereoscopic vascular models of the head and neck: A computed tomography angiography visualization. Cui D; Lynch JC; Smith AD; Wilson TD; Lehman MN Anat Sci Educ; 2016; 9(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 25929248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Web-based interactive 3D visualization as a tool for improved anatomy learning. Petersson H; Sinkvist D; Wang C; Smedby O Anat Sci Educ; 2009; 2(2):61-8. PubMed ID: 19363804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Human anatomy: let the students tell us how to teach. Davis CR; Bates AS; Ellis H; Roberts AM Anat Sci Educ; 2014; 7(4):262-72. PubMed ID: 24249485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Two-dimensional sectioned images and three-dimensional surface models for learning the anatomy of the female pelvis. Shin DS; Jang HG; Hwang SB; Har DH; Moon YL; Chung MS Anat Sci Educ; 2013; 6(5):316-23. PubMed ID: 23463707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]