187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27777640)
21. Artificial tactile and proprioceptive feedback improves performance and confidence on object identification tasks.
Schiefer MA; Graczyk EL; Sidik SM; Tan DW; Tyler DJ
PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0207659. PubMed ID: 30517154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Closed-loop control of grasping with a myoelectric hand prosthesis: which are the relevant feedback variables for force control?
Ninu A; Dosen S; Muceli S; Rattay F; Dietl H; Farina D
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2014 Sep; 22(5):1041-52. PubMed ID: 24801625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Sensitivity to temporal parameters of intraneural tactile sensory feedback.
Valle G; Strauss I; D'Anna E; Granata G; Di Iorio R; Stieglitz T; Rossini PM; Raspopovic S; Petrini FM; Micera S
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2020 Aug; 17(1):110. PubMed ID: 32799900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A preliminary study on characterisation of finger interface kinetics using a pressure and shear sensor system.
Hale N; Valero M; Tang J; Moser D; Jiang L
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Feb; 42(1):60-65. PubMed ID: 28856964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The clinical relevance of advanced artificial feedback in the control of a multi-functional myoelectric prosthesis.
Markovic M; Schweisfurth MA; Engels LF; Bentz T; Wüstefeld D; Farina D; Dosen S
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Mar; 15(1):28. PubMed ID: 29580245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Biomimetic Intraneural Sensory Feedback Enhances Sensation Naturalness, Tactile Sensitivity, and Manual Dexterity in a Bidirectional Prosthesis.
Valle G; Mazzoni A; Iberite F; D'Anna E; Strauss I; Granata G; Controzzi M; Clemente F; Rognini G; Cipriani C; Stieglitz T; Petrini FM; Rossini PM; Micera S
Neuron; 2018 Oct; 100(1):37-45.e7. PubMed ID: 30244887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Utilizing Tactile Feedback for Biomimetic Grasping Control in Upper Limb Prostheses.
Osborn L; Thakor NV; Kaliki R
Proc IEEE Sens; 2013 Nov; 2013():. PubMed ID: 34035872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Design and Functional Evaluation of a Dexterous Myoelectric Hand Prosthesis With Biomimetic Tactile Sensor.
Zhang T; Jiang L; Liu H
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2018 Jul; 26(7):1391-1399. PubMed ID: 29985148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Closed-loop stimulation of lateral cervical spinal cord in upper-limb amputees to enable sensory discrimination: a case study.
Nanivadekar AC; Chandrasekaran S; Helm ER; Boninger ML; Collinger JL; Gaunt RA; Fisher LE
Sci Rep; 2022 Oct; 12(1):17002. PubMed ID: 36220864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Adding vibrotactile feedback to a myoelectric-controlled hand improves performance when online visual feedback is disturbed.
Raveh E; Portnoy S; Friedman J
Hum Mov Sci; 2018 Apr; 58():32-40. PubMed ID: 29353091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. EMG Biofeedback for online predictive control of grasping force in a myoelectric prosthesis.
Dosen S; Markovic M; Somer K; Graimann B; Farina D
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2015 Jun; 12():55. PubMed ID: 26088323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The Interaction Between Feedback Type and Learning in Routine Grasping With Myoelectric Prostheses.
Wilke MA; Hartmann C; Schimpf F; Farina D; Dosen S
IEEE Trans Haptics; 2020; 13(3):645-654. PubMed ID: 31870991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Object discrimination using electrotactile feedback.
Arakeri TJ; Hasse BA; Fuglevand AJ
J Neural Eng; 2018 Aug; 15(4):046007. PubMed ID: 29629874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Opinions on noninvasive sensory feedback of upper limb prosthetic users.
Smither FC; Andrews KL; Scrabeck TL; Lennon RJ; Zhao KD
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2022 Dec; 46(6):591-600. PubMed ID: 36515904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Designing Feedback Controllers for Human-Prosthetic Systems Using H
Costacurta J; Osborn L; Thakor N; Sarma S
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2018 Jul; 2018():2316-2319. PubMed ID: 30440870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Towards optimizing the non-invasive sensory feedback interfaces in a neural prosthetic control.
Su S; Chai G; Meng J; Sheng X; Mouraux A; Zhu X
J Neural Eng; 2022 Feb; 19(1):. PubMed ID: 35073525
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Applications of sensory feedback in motorized upper extremity prosthesis: a review.
Schofield JS; Evans KR; Carey JP; Hebert JS
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2014 Sep; 11(5):499-511. PubMed ID: 24928327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A Control Architecture for Grasp Strength Regulation in Myocontrolled Robotic Hands Using Vibrotactile Feedback: Preliminary Results.
Meattini R; Biagiotti L; Palli G; De Gregorio D; Melchiorri C
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2019 Jun; 2019():1272-1277. PubMed ID: 31374804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Grasping Force Control of Multi-Fingered Robotic Hands through Tactile Sensing for Object Stabilization.
Deng Z; Jonetzko Y; Zhang L; Zhang J
Sensors (Basel); 2020 Feb; 20(4):. PubMed ID: 32075193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Spike timing-based coding in neuromimetic tactile system enables dynamic object classification.
Chen L; Karilanova S; Chaki S; Wen C; Wang L; Winblad B; Zhang SL; Özçelikkale A; Zhang ZB
Science; 2024 May; 384(6696):660-665. PubMed ID: 38723082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
