These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27777675)

  • 1. Daily Encounter Cards-Evaluating the Quality of Documented Assessments.
    Cheung WJ; Dudek N; Wood TJ; Frank JR
    J Grad Med Educ; 2016 Oct; 8(4):601-604. PubMed ID: 27777675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Supervisor-trainee continuity and the quality of work-based assessments.
    Cheung WJ; Dudek NL; Wood TJ; Frank JR
    Med Educ; 2017 Dec; 51(12):1260-1268. PubMed ID: 28971502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing the Ottawa Emergency Department Shift Observation Tool (O-EDShOT) to the traditional daily encounter card: measuring the quality of documented assessments.
    Endres K; Dudek N; McConnell M; Cheung WJ
    CJEM; 2021 May; 23(3):383-389. PubMed ID: 33512695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Daily Evaluation Cards Are Superior for Student Assessment Compared to Single Rater In-Training Evaluations.
    Johnston J; Pinsk M
    Med Sci Educ; 2020 Mar; 30(1):203-209. PubMed ID: 34457660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In-training evaluations: developing an automated screening tool to measure report quality.
    Bismil R; Dudek NL; Wood TJ
    Med Educ; 2014 Jul; 48(7):724-32. PubMed ID: 24909534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Quality of Assessment of Learning (Qual) Score: Validity Evidence for a Scoring System Aimed at Rating Short, Workplace-Based Comments on Trainee Performance.
    Chan TM; Sebok-Syer SS; Sampson C; Monteiro S
    Teach Learn Med; 2020; 32(3):319-329. PubMed ID: 32013584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exploring gender influences in the quality of workplace-based assessments.
    Ingratta J; Dudek N; Lacroix L; Cortel-LeBlanc M; McConnell M; Cheung WJ
    CJEM; 2023 Jun; 25(6):475-480. PubMed ID: 37166679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality in-training evaluation reports--does feedback drive faculty performance?
    Dudek NL; Marks MB; Bandiera G; White J; Wood TJ
    Acad Med; 2013 Aug; 88(8):1129-34. PubMed ID: 23807095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How Reliable are Single-Question Workplace-Based Assessments in Surgery?
    Gates RS; Krumm AE; Cate OT; Chen X; Marcotte K; Thelen AE; Deal SB; Alseidi A; Swanson D; George BC
    J Surg Educ; 2024 Jul; 81(7):967-972. PubMed ID: 38816336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does faculty development influence the quality of in-training evaluation reports in pharmacy?
    Wilbur K
    BMC Med Educ; 2017 Nov; 17(1):222. PubMed ID: 29157239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Training less-experienced faculty improves reliability of skills assessment in cardiac surgery.
    Lou X; Lee R; Feins RH; Enter D; Hicks GL; Verrier ED; Fann JI
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Dec; 148(6):2491-6.e1-2. PubMed ID: 25308119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Resident evaluations: the use of daily evaluation forms in rheumatology ambulatory care.
    Humphrey-Murto S; Khalidi N; Smith CD; Kaminska E; Touchie C; Keely E; Wood TJ
    J Rheumatol; 2009 Jun; 36(6):1298-303. PubMed ID: 19332624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The ophthalmic clinical evaluation exercise: reliability determination.
    Golnik KC; Goldenhar L
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Oct; 112(10):1649-54. PubMed ID: 16111754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How faculty members experience workplace-based assessment rater training: a qualitative study.
    Kogan JR; Conforti LN; Bernabeo E; Iobst W; Holmboe E
    Med Educ; 2015 Jul; 49(7):692-708. PubMed ID: 26077217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Objective Structured Assessments of Technical Skills (OSATS) Does Not Assess the Quality of the Surgical Result Effectively.
    Anderson DD; Long S; Thomas GW; Putnam MD; Bechtold JE; Karam MD
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Apr; 474(4):874-81. PubMed ID: 26502107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Ottawa resident observation form for nurses (O-RON): evaluation of an assessment tool's psychometric properties in different specialties.
    Chiu H; Wood TJ; Garber A; Halman S; Rekman J; Gofton W; Dudek N
    BMC Med Educ; 2024 May; 24(1):487. PubMed ID: 38698352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Group assessments of resident physicians improve reliability and decrease halo error.
    Thomas MR; Beckman TJ; Mauck KF; Cha SS; Thomas KG
    J Gen Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 26(7):759-64. PubMed ID: 21369769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gender Differences in Work-Based Assessment Scores and Narrative Comments After Direct Observation.
    Heath JK; Kogan JR; Holmboe ES; Conforti L; Park YS; Dine CJ
    J Gen Intern Med; 2024 Aug; 39(10):1795-1802. PubMed ID: 38289461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validity evidence for Quality Improvement Knowledge Application Tool Revised (QIKAT-R) scores: consequences of rater number and type using neurology cases.
    Kassardjian C; Park YS; Braksick S; Cutsforth-Gregory J; Robertson C; Young N; Leep Hunderfund A
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2019 Nov; 28(11):925-933. PubMed ID: 30996038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inter-rater Agreement of End-of-shift Evaluations Based on a Single Encounter.
    Warrington S; Beeson M; Bradford A
    West J Emerg Med; 2017 Apr; 18(3):518-524. PubMed ID: 28435505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.