These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27779349)

  • 1. Evaluation of I-Gel
    Jain D; Ghai B; Gandhi K; Banerjee G; Bala I; Samujh R
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2016 Dec; 26(12):1136-1141. PubMed ID: 27779349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of I-gel™ airway in different head and neck positions in anesthetized paralyzed children.
    Jain D; Ghai B; Bala I; Gandhi K; Banerjee G
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2015 Dec; 25(12):1248-53. PubMed ID: 26383088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Device stability and quality of ventilation of classic laryngeal mask airway versus AIR-Q and I-gel at different head and neck positions in anesthetized spontaneously breathing children.
    Abdel-Ghaffar HS; Abdelal FA; Osman MA; Soliman OM
    Minerva Anestesiol; 2020 Mar; 86(3):286-294. PubMed ID: 31922375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Head Rotation Reduces Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure of the i-gel and LMA® Supreme™ in Paralyzed, Anesthetized Patients: A Randomized Trial.
    Chaki T; Tachibana S; Kumita S; Sato H; Hamada K; Tokinaga Y; Yamakage M
    Anesth Analg; 2021 Mar; 132(3):818-826. PubMed ID: 32889846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal and the laryngeal tube airway in paralyzed anesthetized adult patients undergoing pressure-controlled ventilation.
    Brimacombe J; Keller C; Brimacombe L
    Anesth Analg; 2002 Sep; 95(3):770-6, table of contents. PubMed ID: 12198070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of i-gel(™) airway in children: a meta-analysis.
    Maitra S; Baidya DK; Bhattacharjee S; Khanna P
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2014 Oct; 24(10):1072-9. PubMed ID: 25041224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of i-gel™ and Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™ in Different Head and Neck Positions in Spontaneously Breathing Pediatric Population.
    Gupta S; Dogra N; Chauhan K
    Anesth Essays Res; 2017; 11(3):647-650. PubMed ID: 28928564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The randomized crossover comparison of airway sealing with the laryngeal mask airway Supreme(™) at three different intracuff pressures in children.
    Choi KW; Lee JR; Oh JT; Kim DW; Kim MS
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2014 Oct; 24(10):1080-7. PubMed ID: 25059727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway with the I-Gel™ in the different head-and-neck positions in anaesthetised paralysed children: A randomised controlled trial.
    Banerjee G; Jain D; Bala I; Gandhi K; Samujh R
    Indian J Anaesth; 2018 Feb; 62(2):103-108. PubMed ID: 29491514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal leak pressure and cuff position with the flexible and the standard laryngeal mask airway.
    Keller C; Brimacombe J
    Anesth Analg; 1999 Apr; 88(4):913-6. PubMed ID: 10195547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of head and neck position on the oropharyngeal leak pressure and cuff position of three supraglottic airway devices.
    Park SH; Han SH; Do SH; Kim JW; Kim JH
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Jan; 108(1):112-7. PubMed ID: 19095838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Flexion compromises ventilation with the laryngeal tube suction II in children.
    Kim JT; Na HS; Bae JY; Kim HJ; Shin HY; Kim HS; Kim CS; Kim SD
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2009 Feb; 19(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 19143960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical evaluation of the v-gel supraglottic airway device in comparison with a classical laryngeal mask and endotracheal intubation in cats during spontaneous and controlled mechanical ventilation.
    Prasse SA; Schrack J; Wenger S; Mosing M
    Vet Anaesth Analg; 2016 Jan; 43(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 25819338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Size 1 ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway in infants: a randomized, noncrossover study with the Classic™ laryngeal mask airway.
    López-Gil M; Mantilla I; Blanco T; Teigell E; Hervias M; Fernández-López R
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2012 Apr; 22(4):365-70. PubMed ID: 22295870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of head and neck position on performance of the Ambu® AuraGain™ laryngeal mask: a randomized crossover study.
    Yoo S; Park SK; Kim WH; Hur M; Bahk JH; Lim YJ; Kim JT
    Minerva Anestesiol; 2019 Feb; 85(2):133-138. PubMed ID: 29589419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cricoid pressure impedes insertion of, and ventilation through, the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized, paralyzed patients.
    Li CW; Xue FS; Xu YC; Liu Y; Mao P; Liu KP; Yang QY; Zhang GH; Sun HT
    Anesth Analg; 2007 May; 104(5):1195-8, tables of contents. PubMed ID: 17456674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Randomized prospective study comparing the laryngeal tube suction II with the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized and paralyzed patients.
    Kikuchi T; Kamiya Y; Ohtsuka T; Miki T; Goto T
    Anesthesiology; 2008 Jul; 109(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 18580172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Crossover comparison of the laryngeal mask supreme and the i-gel in simulated difficult airway scenario in anesthetized patients.
    Theiler LG; Kleine-Brueggeney M; Kaiser D; Urwyler N; Luyet C; Vogt A; Greif R; Unibe MM
    Anesthesiology; 2009 Jul; 111(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 19512881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of neck extension on success rate of blind intubation through Ambu® AuraGain™ laryngeal mask: a randomized clinical trial.
    Yoo S; Park SK; Kim WH; Hur M; Bahk JH; Lim YJ; Kim JT
    Can J Anaesth; 2019 Jun; 66(6):639-647. PubMed ID: 30919236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. To compare the influence of blind insertion and up-down optimized glottic exposure manoeuvre on oropharyngeal leak pressure using SaCoVLM™ video laryngeal mask among patients undergoing general anesthesia.
    Yan CL; Zhang YQ; Chen Y; Qv ZY; Zuo MZ
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2023 Apr; 37(2):593-598. PubMed ID: 36308611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.