These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27780809)

  • 1. Letter to the Editor response: Nygaard et al.
    Towfic F; Kusko R; Zeskind B
    Biostatistics; 2017 Apr; 18(2):197-199. PubMed ID: 27780809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of statistical methods and the use of quality control samples for batch effect correction in human transcriptome data.
    Espín-Pérez A; Portier C; Chadeau-Hyam M; van Veldhoven K; Kleinjans JCS; de Kok TMCM
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0202947. PubMed ID: 30161168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Putative null distributions corresponding to tests of differential expression in the Golden Spike dataset are intensity dependent.
    Gaile DP; Miecznikowski JC
    BMC Genomics; 2007 Apr; 8():105. PubMed ID: 17445265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Removing Batch Effects from Longitudinal Gene Expression - Quantile Normalization Plus ComBat as Best Approach for Microarray Transcriptome Data.
    Müller C; Schillert A; Röthemeier C; Trégouët DA; Proust C; Binder H; Pfeiffer N; Beutel M; Lackner KJ; Schnabel RB; Tiret L; Wild PS; Blankenberg S; Zeller T; Ziegler A
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0156594. PubMed ID: 27272489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. EVE (external variance estimation) increases statistical power for detecting differentially expressed genes.
    Wille A; Gruissem W; Bühlmann P; Hennig L
    Plant J; 2007 Nov; 52(3):561-9. PubMed ID: 17680783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality assessment of the Affymetrix U133A&B probesets by target sequence mapping and expression data analysis.
    Orlov YL; Zhou J; Lipovich L; Shahab A; Kuznetsov VA
    In Silico Biol; 2007; 7(3):241-60. PubMed ID: 18415975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Removing batch effects from purified plasma cell gene expression microarrays with modified ComBat.
    Stein CK; Qu P; Epstein J; Buros A; Rosenthal A; Crowley J; Morgan G; Barlogie B
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Feb; 16():63. PubMed ID: 25887219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cross platform microarray analysis for robust identification of differentially expressed genes.
    Bosotti R; Locatelli G; Healy S; Scacheri E; Sartori L; Mercurio C; Calogero R; Isacchi A
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Mar; 8 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S5. PubMed ID: 17430572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of sample imbalance on identifying differentially expressed genes.
    Yang K; Li J; Gao H
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Dec; 7 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S8. PubMed ID: 17217526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statistical detection of differentially expressed genes based on RNA-seq: from biological to phylogenetic replicates.
    Gu X
    Brief Bioinform; 2016 Mar; 17(2):243-8. PubMed ID: 26108230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identification and utilization of inter-species conserved (ISC) probesets on Affymetrix human GeneChip platforms for the optimization of the assessment of expression patterns in non human primate (NHP) samples.
    Wang Z; Lewis MG; Nau ME; Arnold A; Vahey MT
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Oct; 5():165. PubMed ID: 15507140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Identification of differentially expressed gene categories in microarray studies using nonparametric multivariate analysis.
    Nettleton D; Recknor J; Reecy JM
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Jan; 24(2):192-201. PubMed ID: 18042553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. High-resolution spatial normalization for microarrays containing embedded technical replicates.
    Yuan DS; Irizarry RA
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Dec; 22(24):3054-60. PubMed ID: 17060357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficient two-sample designs for microarray experiments with biological replications.
    Landgrebe J; Bretz F; Brunner E
    In Silico Biol; 2004; 4(4):461-70. PubMed ID: 15506995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A non-transformation method for identifying differentially expressed genes from cDNA microarrays.
    Zhang JG; Yin ZJ; Zhang Q
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2006 Jan; 33(1):80-8. PubMed ID: 16450591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robust gene selection methods using weighting schemes for microarray data analysis.
    Kang S; Song J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Sep; 18(1):389. PubMed ID: 28865426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tests for differential gene expression using weights in oligonucleotide microarray experiments.
    Hu P; Beyene J; Greenwood CM
    BMC Genomics; 2006 Feb; 7():33. PubMed ID: 16504060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating the effect of various background correction methods regarding noise reduction, in two-channel microarray data.
    Sifakis EG; Prentza A; Koutsouris D; Chatziioannou AA
    Comput Biol Med; 2012 Jan; 42(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 22074762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sex genes for genomic analysis in human brain: internal controls for comparison of probe level data extraction.
    Galfalvy HC; Erraji-Benchekroun L; Smyrniotopoulos P; Pavlidis P; Ellis SP; Mann JJ; Sibille E; Arango V
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2003 Sep; 4():37. PubMed ID: 12962547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Previously unidentified changes in renal cell carcinoma gene expression identified by parametric analysis of microarray data.
    Lenburg ME; Liou LS; Gerry NP; Frampton GM; Cohen HT; Christman MF
    BMC Cancer; 2003 Nov; 3():31. PubMed ID: 14641932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.