491 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27781383)
1. Topographic, tomographic and biomechanical corneal changes during pregnancy in patients with keratoconus: a cohort study.
Naderan M; Jahanrad A
Acta Ophthalmol; 2017 Jun; 95(4):e291-e296. PubMed ID: 27781383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Association between Family History and Keratoconus Severity.
Naderan M; Rajabi MT; Zarrinbakhsh P; Naderan M; Bakhshi A
Curr Eye Res; 2016 Nov; 41(11):1414-1418. PubMed ID: 27158890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Anterior, posterior and biomechanical parameters of cornea during pregnancy in healthy eyes: a cohort study.
Naderan M; Jahanrad A
Br J Ophthalmol; 2018 Mar; 102(3):309-312. PubMed ID: 28756375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical diagnosis of keratoconus: evaluation of the keratoconus match index and the keratoconus match probability.
Labiris G; Gatzioufas Z; Sideroudi H; Giarmoukakis A; Kozobolis V; Seitz B
Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Jun; 91(4):e258-62. PubMed ID: 23557430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Keratoconus Clinical Findings According to Different Classifications.
Naderan M; Shoar S; Kamaleddin MA; Rajabi MT; Naderan M; Khodadadi M
Cornea; 2015 Sep; 34(9):1005-11. PubMed ID: 26203749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is keratoconus more severe in pediatric population?
Naderan M; Rajabi MT; Zarrinbakhsh P; Farjadnia M
Int Ophthalmol; 2017 Oct; 37(5):1169-1173. PubMed ID: 27783185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Parental Corneal Tomographic and Biomechanical Characteristics of Patients With Keratoconus.
Li J; Zhang BN; Jhanji V; Wang X; Li D; Du X
Am J Ophthalmol; 2023 Dec; 256():146-155. PubMed ID: 37567431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Role of Ocular Response Analyzer in Differentiation of Forme Fruste Keratoconus From Corneal Astigmatism.
Kirgiz A; Karaman Erdur S; Atalay K; Gurez C
Eye Contact Lens; 2019 Mar; 45(2):83-87. PubMed ID: 30265255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Relationship of Structural Characteristics to Biomechanical Profile in Normal, Keratoconic, and Crosslinked Eyes.
Viswanathan D; Kumar NL; Males JJ; Graham SL
Cornea; 2015 Jul; 34(7):791-6. PubMed ID: 25850703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Corneal biomechanical metrics and anterior segment parameters in mild keratoconus.
Fontes BM; Ambrósio R; Jardim D; Velarde GC; Nosé W
Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):673-9. PubMed ID: 20138369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of corneal measurements in normal and keratoconus eyes using Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography (AS-OCT) and Pentacam HR topographer.
Said OM; Kamal M; Tawfik S; Saif ATS
BMC Ophthalmol; 2023 May; 23(1):194. PubMed ID: 37138239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficacy of corneal tomography parameters and biomechanical characteristic in keratoconus detection.
Ahmadi Hosseini SM; Abolbashari F; Niyazmand H; Sedaghat MR
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2014 Feb; 37(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 23910506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Corneal Topographic, Anatomic, and Biomechanical Properties in Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea-Hypopnea Syndrome.
Arriola-Villalobos P; Benito-Pascual B; Peraza-Nieves J; Perucho-González L; Sastre-Ibañez M; Dupré-Peláez MG; Asorey-García A; Fernández-Sánchez-Alarcos JM
Cornea; 2020 Jan; 39(1):88-91. PubMed ID: 31414996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pediatric Keratoconus: Topographic, Biomechanical and Aberrometric Characteristics.
Gupta Y; Sharma N; Maharana PK; Saxena R; Sinha R; Agarwal T; Jhanji V; Titiyal JS
Am J Ophthalmol; 2021 May; 225():69-75. PubMed ID: 33385369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of corneal topographic measurements and high order aberrations in keratoconus and normal eyes.
Colak HN; Kantarci FA; Yildirim A; Tatar MG; Goker H; Uslu H; Gurler B
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2016 Oct; 39(5):380-4. PubMed ID: 27395753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Superiority of Baseline Biomechanical Properties over Corneal Tomography in Predicting Keratoconus Progression.
Erol MA; Atalay E; Özalp O; Divarcı A; Yıldırım N
Turk J Ophthalmol; 2021 Oct; 51(5):257-264. PubMed ID: 34702018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical evaluation of cornea in topographically normal relatives of patients with keratoconus.
Kara N; Altinkaynak H; Baz O; Goker Y
Cornea; 2013 Mar; 32(3):262-6. PubMed ID: 22677642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improved keratoconus detection by ocular response analyzer testing after consideration of corneal thickness as a confounding factor.
Galletti JG; Pförtner T; Bonthoux FF
J Refract Surg; 2012 Mar; 28(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 22230059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Corneal biomechanical properties and anterior segment parameters in forme fruste keratoconus.
Kozobolis V; Sideroudi H; Giarmoukakis A; Gkika M; Labiris G
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2012; 22(6):920-30. PubMed ID: 22865401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic Ability of Corneal Shape and Biomechanical Parameters for Detecting Frank Keratoconus.
Sedaghat MR; Momeni-Moghaddam H; Ambrósio R; Heidari HR; Maddah N; Danesh Z; Sabzi F
Cornea; 2018 Aug; 37(8):1025-1034. PubMed ID: 29847493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
