494 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27781383)
21. Can we measure corneal biomechanical changes after collagen cross-linking in eyes with keratoconus?--a pilot study.
Goldich Y; Barkana Y; Morad Y; Hartstein M; Avni I; Zadok D
Cornea; 2009 Jun; 28(5):498-502. PubMed ID: 19421050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Discriminant Value of Custom Ocular Response Analyzer Waveform Derivatives in Forme Fruste Keratoconus.
Luz A; Lopes B; Hallahan KM; Valbon B; Fontes B; Schor P; Dupps WJ; Ambrósio R
Am J Ophthalmol; 2016 Apr; 164():14-21. PubMed ID: 26743618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of corneal elevation, pachymetry and keratometry in keratoconic eyes with respect to the stage of Amsler-Krumeich classification.
Kamiya K; Ishii R; Shimizu K; Igarashi A
Br J Ophthalmol; 2014 Apr; 98(4):459-63. PubMed ID: 24457362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Comparative evaluation of different corneal cross-linking techniques with respect to biomechanical stability of the cornea].
Pashtaev NP; Pozdeeva NA; Sinitsyn MV; Zotov VV; Gagloev BV
Vestn Oftalmol; 2016; 132(2):38-46. PubMed ID: 27213796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Trans epithelial corneal collagen crosslinking for progressive keratoconus: 6 months follow up.
De Bernardo M; Capasso L; Tortori A; Lanza M; Caliendo L; Rosa N
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2014 Dec; 37(6):438-41. PubMed ID: 25172670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Asymmetry between Left and Right Eyes in Keratoconus Patients Increases with the Severity of the Worse Eye.
Eppig T; Spira-Eppig C; Goebels S; Seitz B; El-Husseiny M; Lenhart M; Papavasileiou K; Szentmáry N; Langenbucher A
Curr Eye Res; 2018 Jul; 43(7):848-855. PubMed ID: 29558197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Progression of keratoconus by longitudinal assessment with corneal topography.
Choi JA; Kim MS
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Feb; 53(2):927-35. PubMed ID: 22247476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of corneal measurements in keratoconus using swept-source optical coherence tomography and combined Placido-Scheimpflug imaging.
Chan TCY; Biswas S; Yu M; Jhanji V
Acta Ophthalmol; 2017 Sep; 95(6):e486-e494. PubMed ID: 27805316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Combining ocular response analyzer metrics for corneal biomechanical diagnosis.
Ruiseñor Vázquez PR; Delrivo M; Bonthoux FF; Pförtner T; Galletti JG
J Refract Surg; 2013 Sep; 29(9):596-602. PubMed ID: 23848186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Clinical biomicroscopy and retinoscopy findings of keratoconus in a Middle Eastern population.
Naderan M; Jahanrad A; Farjadnia M
Clin Exp Optom; 2018 Jan; 101(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 28879667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Intereye asymmetry in bilateral keratoconus, keratoconus suspect and normal eyes and its relationship with disease severity.
Naderan M; Rajabi MT; Zarrinbakhsh P
Br J Ophthalmol; 2017 Nov; 101(11):1475-1482. PubMed ID: 28432114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Differential precision of corneal Pentacam HR measurements in early and advanced keratoconus.
Flynn TH; Sharma DP; Bunce C; Wilkins MR
Br J Ophthalmol; 2016 Sep; 100(9):1183-7. PubMed ID: 26659714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Repeatability of topographic corneal thickness in keratoconus comparing Visante™ OCT and Oculus Pentacam HR
Otchere H; Sorbara L
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2017 Aug; 40(4):217-223. PubMed ID: 28501441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Biomechanical responses of healthy and keratoconic corneas measured using a noncontact scheimpflug-based tonometer.
Ali NQ; Patel DV; McGhee CN
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 May; 55(6):3651-9. PubMed ID: 24833745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Correlation Between Corneal Biomechanical Indices and the Severity of Keratoconus.
Koh S; Inoue R; Ambrósio R; Maeda N; Miki A; Nishida K
Cornea; 2020 Feb; 39(2):215-221. PubMed ID: 31478950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of multimetric D index with keratometric, pachymetric, and posterior elevation parameters in diagnosing subclinical keratoconus in fellow eyes of asymmetric keratoconus patients.
Muftuoglu O; Ayar O; Hurmeric V; Orucoglu F; Kılıc I
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Mar; 41(3):557-65. PubMed ID: 25708211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Accuracy of Goldmann, ocular response analyser, Pascal and TonoPen XL tonometry in keratoconic and normal eyes.
Mollan SP; Wolffsohn JS; Nessim M; Laiquzzaman M; Sivakumar S; Hartley S; Shah S
Br J Ophthalmol; 2008 Dec; 92(12):1661-5. PubMed ID: 18757471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Anterior Corneal Curvature and Aberration Changes After Scleral Lens Wear in Keratoconus Patients With and Without Ring Segments.
Serramito-Blanco M; Carpena-Torres C; Carballo J; Piñero D; Lipson M; Carracedo G
Eye Contact Lens; 2019 Mar; 45(2):141-148. PubMed ID: 30005055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of Scheimpflug and swept-source anterior segment optical coherence tomography in normal and keratoconus eyes.
Ghoreishi SM; Mortazavi SAA; Abtahi ZA; Abtahi MA; Sonbolestan SA; Abtahi SH; Mohammadinia M; Isfahani KN
Int Ophthalmol; 2017 Aug; 37(4):965-971. PubMed ID: 27671494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Characteristics of corneal topography in parents of keratoconus patients].
Li J; Jing LL; Du XL
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Jun; 56(6):456-464. PubMed ID: 32842328
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
