These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2778225)
21. [Four years of screening cervical smears of cervical lesions]. Autillo-Touati A; Benmoura D; Palazzi D; Robaglia A; Tasso F; Blanc B; Seite R J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1992; 21(7):754-60. PubMed ID: 1469229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Cervical cancer screening in older women. Issues and interventions. Blesch KS; Prohaska TR Cancer Nurs; 1991 Jun; 14(3):141-7. PubMed ID: 2059957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Cervical cancer screening in a rural population of Zimbabwe. Thistle PJ; Chirenje ZM Cent Afr J Med; 1997 Sep; 43(9):246-51. PubMed ID: 9509642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Improving Pap smears. Loeb RA Am Fam Physician; 1989 Dec; 40(6):48, 50. PubMed ID: 2589151 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Quality assurance in cervical cytopathology. Light AM Cytopathology; 1997 Aug; 8(4):290-2. PubMed ID: 9252748 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. [New classification in cervical cytology: the Bethesda system]. Bodó M; Tóth V Orv Hetil; 1991 May; 132(19):1039-40. PubMed ID: 2027678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cervical cancer screening from the public health perspective. Steiner C Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(4):471-4. PubMed ID: 2750437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Cervical smears taken by physicians' assistants are of lesser quality than smears taken by family physicians, but almost as good as the national average]. Voordijk-van der Ben MH; Buntinx F Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Jan; 144(2):74-7. PubMed ID: 10674106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [The impending loss of screening for cervix uteri carcinoma in the Netherlands]. Lammes FB Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1986 Apr; 130(15):673-4. PubMed ID: 3703044 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. [Cervical cancer screening and associated treatment costs in France]. Bergeron C; Breugelmans JG; Bouée S; Lorans C; Bénard S; Rémy V Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2006 Nov; 34(11):1036-42. PubMed ID: 17070085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The politics of pap smears. Thompson J Contemp Nurse; 1996 Mar; 5(1):4. PubMed ID: 8716998 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Human papillomavirus and cervical disease in adolescents. Guido R Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 51(2):290-305. PubMed ID: 18463460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Ambulatory care visits for Pap tests, abnormal Pap test results, and cervical cancer procedures in the United States. Saraiya M; McCaig LF; Ekwueme DU Am J Manag Care; 2010 Jun; 16(6):e137-44. PubMed ID: 20536271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. ["Papanicolaou." Outmoded, isn't it?]. de León-Antoni E Bol Asoc Med P R; 1991 Oct; 83(10):462-4. PubMed ID: 1789893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Does the increased sensitivity of the new Papanicolaou (Pap) tests improve the cost-effectiveness of screening for cervical cancer? Reust CE J Fam Pract; 2001 Feb; 50(2):175. PubMed ID: 11219567 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The Bethesda system for classification of Pap smears: the clinical experience of one cancer screening center. Mahon SM Cancer Nurs; 1995 Dec; 18(6):458-66. PubMed ID: 8564942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. ASCCP patient management guidelines: Pap test specimen adequacy and quality indicators. Davey DD; Austin RM; Birdsong G; Buck HW; Cox JT; Darragh TM; Elgert PA; Hanson V; Henry MR; Waldman J; Am J Clin Pathol; 2002 Nov; 118(5):714-8. PubMed ID: 12428791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Cytology reports: are the "Pap" classes outdated? Marcus PB; Justice KL Tex Med; 1984 Dec; 80(12):38-40. PubMed ID: 6515577 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The rationalization for infrequent Pap smears. Twiggs LB Minn Med; 1982 Feb; 65(2):87-9. PubMed ID: 7087950 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]