These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2778230)

  • 1. Peer review for the nurse-directed health service.
    Woolard D; Peterson AM
    J Am Coll Health; 1989 Sep; 38(2):91-3. PubMed ID: 2778230
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Peer review: a practical guide.
    Allbritten D; Boland M; Hubert P; Kiernan B
    Pediatr Nurs; 1982; 8(1):31-2. PubMed ID: 6916179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An innovative approach to peer review for the advanced practice nurse--a focus on critical incidents.
    Kenny KJ; Baker L; Lanzon M; Stevens LR; Yancy M
    J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 2008 Jul; 20(7):376-81. PubMed ID: 18638177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patient acceptance of the nurse practitioner. Experience in a university health service.
    Scott SR
    J Am Coll Health Assoc; 1975 Jun; 23(5):364. PubMed ID: 1165348
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality of care by neonatal nurse practitioners: a review of the Ashington experiment.
    Hall D; Wilkinson AR
    Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2005 May; 90(3):F195-200. PubMed ID: 15846007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Initiation into peer review.
    Hauser MA
    Am J Nurs; 1975 Dec; 75(12):2204-7. PubMed ID: 1041840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality assurance: an ethical responsibility.
    Blake BL
    Superv Nurse; 1981 Feb; 12(2):32-8. PubMed ID: 6906884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perceptions of health services by student affairs officers: is the partnership healthy?
    Rickard S
    J Am Coll Health; 1987 Jan; 35(4):153-7. PubMed ID: 3819188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Putting peer review into practice.
    Blanton NE; Bogner MJ; Collins HL; Futrell JA; Lagina S; Rolison A
    Am J Nurs; 1985 Nov; 85(11):1284, 1287. PubMed ID: 3851632
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nurses use peer review to monitor quality care.
    Christensen C
    Hosp Peer Rev; 1981 Aug; 6(8):92-3. PubMed ID: 10252735
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Peer review among rural clinics.
    Hiserote JL; Bultemeier K; Kimberly SL; Nicoll JE; Wheeler K
    Nurse Pract; 1980; 5(1):30-2. PubMed ID: 7354951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Peer review--a working experiment.
    Gold H; Jackson M; Sachs B; Van Meter MJ
    Nurs Outlook; 1973 Oct; 21(10):634-6. PubMed ID: 4492798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparative study of nursing home resident outcomes between care provided by nurse practitioners/physicians versus physicians only.
    Aigner MJ; Drew S; Phipps J
    J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2004; 5(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 14706124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nurse practitioner peer review: process and evaluation.
    Sheahan SL; Simpson C; Rayens MK
    J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 2001 Mar; 13(3):140-5. PubMed ID: 11930586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality assurance in the provision of hospital care. A model for evaluating nursing care.
    Zimmer MJ
    Hospitals; 1974 Mar; 48(5):91-5 passim. PubMed ID: 4815747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The nurse practitioner clinic in a university health service.
    McBride TC
    J Am Coll Health Assoc; 1972 Dec; 21(2):159-62. PubMed ID: 4641394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Establishing a nurse-managed health center: assuring excellence.
    Davis EO
    Nurse Pract Forum; 1993 Sep; 4(3):151-7. PubMed ID: 8369670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Peer review for the independent practitioner.
    McAndrew T
    Pa Nurse; 1988 Jun; 43(6):6-7. PubMed ID: 3380545
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Variations in the ability of general medical practitioners to apply two methods of clinical audit: A five-year study of assessment by peer review.
    McKay J; Bowie P; Lough M
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2006 Dec; 12(6):622-9. PubMed ID: 17100861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reducing health risks through peer health education: a preliminary report.
    Nagelberg DB; Hodge JM; Ketzer JM
    J Am Coll Health Assoc; 1980 Feb; 28(4):234-5. PubMed ID: 7381120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.