130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27782717)
1. Quantitative assessment of biliary stent artifacts on MR images: Potential implications for target delineation in radiotherapy.
Gurney-Champion OJ; Bruins Slot T; Lens E; van der Horst A; Klaassen R; van Laarhoven HW; van Tienhoven G; van Hooft JE; Nederveen AJ; Bel A
Med Phys; 2016 Oct; 43(10):5603. PubMed ID: 27782717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative evaluation of susceptibility and shielding effects of nitinol, platinum, cobalt-alloy, and stainless steel stents.
Wang Y; Truong TN; Yen C; Bilecen D; Watts R; Trost DW; Prince MR
Magn Reson Med; 2003 May; 49(5):972-6. PubMed ID: 12704782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Visibility and artifacts of gold fiducial markers used for image guided radiation therapy of pancreatic cancer on MRI.
Gurney-Champion OJ; Lens E; van der Horst A; Houweling AC; Klaassen R; van Hooft JE; Stoker J; van Tienhoven G; Nederveen AJ; Bel A
Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2638-47. PubMed ID: 25979055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of blood-pool contrast media on MR imaging and flow measurements in the presence of pulmonary arterial stents in swine.
Kuehne T; Saeed M; Moore P; Gleason K; Reddy G; Teitel D; Higgins CB
Radiology; 2002 May; 223(2):439-45. PubMed ID: 11997550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Venous Stents at 1.5 T: Susceptibility Artifacts and Radiofrequency Shielding.
Reiss S; Özen AC; Lottner T; Reichert A; Massmann A; Bock M
Invest Radiol; 2020 Nov; 55(11):741-746. PubMed ID: 32604387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Revealing in-stent stenoses of the iliac arteries: comparison of multidetector CT with MR angiography and digital radiographic angiography in a Phantom model.
Maintz D; Tombach B; Juergens KU; Weigel S; Heindel W; Fischbach R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Nov; 179(5):1319-22. PubMed ID: 12388521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. CT and MR imaging of nitinol stents with radiopaque distal markers.
Létourneau-Guillon L; Soulez G; Beaudoin G; Oliva VL; Giroux MF; Qin Z; Boussion N; Therasse E; De Guise J; Cloutier G
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2004 Jun; 15(6):615-24. PubMed ID: 15178723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. High flip angle imaging of metallic stents: implications for MR angiography and intraluminal signal interpretation.
van Holten J; Wielopolski P; Brück E; Pattynama PM; van Dijk LC
Magn Reson Med; 2003 Oct; 50(4):879-83. PubMed ID: 14523976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vitro evaluation of intravascular stent artifacts in three-dimensional MR angiography.
Maintz D; Kugel H; Schellhammer F; Landwehr P
Invest Radiol; 2001 Apr; 36(4):218-24. PubMed ID: 11283419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. MR imaging of vascular stents: effects of susceptibility, flow, and radiofrequency eddy currents.
Bartels LW; Smits HF; Bakker CJ; Viergever MA
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2001 Mar; 12(3):365-71. PubMed ID: 11287516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro stent assessment by MRI: visibility of lumen and artifacts for 27 modern stents.
Heinrich A; Güttler FV; Schlesies F; Aschenbach R; Eckardt N; Teichgräber UK
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2017 Nov; 62(6):565-573. PubMed ID: 27740912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ability of MR cholangiography to reveal stent position and luminal diameter in patients with biliary endoprostheses: in vitro measurements and in vivo results in 30 patients.
Merkle EM; Boll DT; Weidenbach H; Brambs HJ; Gabelmann A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Apr; 176(4):913-8. PubMed ID: 11264077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Magnetic resonance imaging of stents: quantitative in vitro examination at 3 Tesla].
Reinhardt J; Nguyen-Trong TH; Hähnel S; Bellemann ME; Heiland S
Z Med Phys; 2009; 19(4):278-87. PubMed ID: 19995528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 1.5 T after implantation of platinum stents: in vitro and in vivo comparison with conventional stent designs.
Hagspiel KD; Leung DA; Nandalur KR; Angle JF; Dulai HS; Spinosa DJ; Matsumoto AH; Christopher JM; Ahmed H; Berr SS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jan; 184(1):288-94. PubMed ID: 15615990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Systematics of imaging artifacts in MRT caused by metallic vascular implants (stents)].
Graf H; Klemm T; Lauer UA; Duda S; Claussen CD; Schick F
Rofo; 2003 Dec; 175(12):1711-9. PubMed ID: 14661144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stent appearance at contrast-enhanced MR angiography: in vitro examination with 14 stents.
Lenhart M; Völk M; Manke C; Nitz WR; Strotzer M; Feuerbach S; Link J
Radiology; 2000 Oct; 217(1):173-8. PubMed ID: 11012441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. 3.0 T vs. 1.5 T MR angiography: in vitro comparison of intravascular stent artifacts.
Wall A; Kugel H; Bachman R; Matuszewski L; Krämer S; Heindel W; Maintz D
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Dec; 22(6):772-9. PubMed ID: 16270296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Artifact-free in-stent lumen visualization by standard magnetic resonance angiography using a new metallic magnetic resonance imaging stent.
Buecker A; Spuentrup E; Ruebben A; Günther RW
Circulation; 2002 Apr; 105(15):1772-5. PubMed ID: 11956117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Susceptibility-based MR Imaging of Nitinol Stent
Shi C; Wang H; Xie G; Su S; Huang Y; Chen H; Liu X; Zheng H; Liang D
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():5753-5756. PubMed ID: 31947159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MR evaluation of stent patency: in vitro test of 22 metallic stents and the possibility of determining their patency by MR angiography.
Meyer JM; Buecker A; Schuermann K; Ruebben A; Guenther RW
Invest Radiol; 2000 Dec; 35(12):739-46. PubMed ID: 11204801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
