BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

504 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27783538)

  • 21. Prostate Cancer Detection with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 1 versus Version 2.
    Feng ZY; Wang L; Min XD; Wang SG; Wang GP; Cai J
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2016 Oct; 129(20):2451-2459. PubMed ID: 27748338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Assessment of PI-RADS v2 for the Detection of Prostate Cancer.
    Kasel-Seibert M; Lehmann T; Aschenbach R; Guettler FV; Abubrig M; Grimm MO; Teichgraeber U; Franiel T
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Apr; 85(4):726-31. PubMed ID: 26971415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Risk of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Associated With Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 (Equivocal) Lesions Identified on Multiparametric Prostate MRI.
    Sheridan AD; Nath SK; Syed JS; Aneja S; Sprenkle PC; Weinreb JC; Spektor M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Feb; 210(2):347-357. PubMed ID: 29112469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Low cancer yield in PI-RADS 3 upgraded to 4 by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: is it time to reconsider scoring categorization?
    Messina E; Pecoraro M; Laschena L; Bicchetti M; Proietti F; Ciardi A; Leonardo C; Sciarra A; Girometti R; Catalano C; Panebianco V
    Eur Radiol; 2023 Aug; 33(8):5828-5839. PubMed ID: 37045981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of Prostate Imaging and Reporting Data System V2.0 and V2.1 for Evaluation of Transition Zone Lesions: A 5-Reader 202-Patient Analysis.
    Kim N; Kim S; Prabhu V; Shanbhogue K; Smereka P; Tong A; Anthopolos R; Taneja SS; Rosenkrantz AB
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 46(4):523-529. PubMed ID: 35405714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of interreader reproducibility of the prostate imaging reporting and data system and likert scales for evaluation of multiparametric prostate MRI.
    Rosenkrantz AB; Lim RP; Haghighi M; Somberg MB; Babb JS; Taneja SS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Oct; 201(4):W612-8. PubMed ID: 24059400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Diagnostic Performance of PI-RADS v2, Proposed Adjusted PI-RADS v2 and Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Detection: A Preliminary Study.
    Cai GH; Yang QH; Chen WB; Liu QY; Zeng YR; Zeng YJ
    Curr Oncol; 2021 May; 28(3):1823-1834. PubMed ID: 34065851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of the prostate imaging reporting and data system for the detection of prostate cancer by the results of targeted biopsy of the prostate.
    Baur AD; Maxeiner A; Franiel T; Kilic E; Huppertz A; Schwenke C; Hamm B; Durmus T
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Jun; 49(6):411-20. PubMed ID: 24598440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of observation size and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value in PI-RADS v2.1 assessment category 4 and 5 observations compared to adverse pathological outcomes.
    Abreu-Gomez J; Walker D; Alotaibi T; McInnes MDF; Flood TA; Schieda N
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Aug; 30(8):4251-4261. PubMed ID: 32211965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assessment of PI-RADS v2 categories ≥ 3 for diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer.
    Patel NU; Lind KE; Garg K; Crawford D; Werahera PN; Pokharel SS
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Feb; 44(2):705-712. PubMed ID: 30171296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of PI-RADS v1 and v2 for multiparametric MRI detection of prostate cancer with whole-mount histological workup as reference standard.
    Schaudinn A; Gawlitza J; Mucha S; Linder N; Franz T; Horn LC; Kahn T; Busse H
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Jul; 116():180-185. PubMed ID: 31153562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. How Often is the Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Score Needed in PI-RADS Version 2?
    Roh AT; Fan RE; Sonn GA; Vasanawala SS; Ghanouni P; Loening AM
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2020; 49(3):173-176. PubMed ID: 31126664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Updated prostate imaging reporting and data system (PIRADS v2) recommendations for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer using multiparametric MRI: critical evaluation using whole-mount pathology as standard of reference.
    Vargas HA; Hötker AM; Goldman DA; Moskowitz CS; Gondo T; Matsumoto K; Ehdaie B; Woo S; Fine SW; Reuter VE; Sala E; Hricak H
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Jun; 26(6):1606-12. PubMed ID: 26396111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI-Upgraded Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 Category 3 Peripheral Zone Observations Stratified by a Size Threshold of 15 mm.
    Abreu-Gomez J; Krishna S; Narayanasamy S; Flood TA; McInnes MDF; Schieda N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Oct; 213(4):836-843. PubMed ID: 31120786
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Characteristics of PI-RADS 4 lesions within the prostatic peripheral zone: a retrospective diagnostic accuracy study evaluating 170 lesions.
    Shankar PR; Curci NE; Davenport MS
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 Aug; 43(8):2176-2182. PubMed ID: 29198006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Differentiation of prostatitis and prostate cancer using the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS).
    Meier-Schroers M; Kukuk G; Wolter K; Decker G; Fischer S; Marx C; Traeber F; Sprinkart AM; Block W; Schild HH; Willinek W
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jul; 85(7):1304-11. PubMed ID: 27235878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System versions 1 and 2 for the Detection of Peripheral Zone Gleason Score 3 + 4 = 7 Cancers.
    Krishna S; McInnes M; Lim C; Lim R; Hakim SW; Flood TA; Schieda N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Dec; 209(6):W365-W373. PubMed ID: 28981356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Population net benefit of prostate MRI with high spatiotemporal resolution contrast-enhanced imaging: A decision curve analysis.
    Prabhu V; Rosenkrantz AB; Otazo R; Sodickson DK; Kang SK
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 May; 49(5):1400-1408. PubMed ID: 30629317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of Biparametric and Multiparametric MRI for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection With PI-RADS Version 2.1.
    Tamada T; Kido A; Yamamoto A; Takeuchi M; Miyaji Y; Moriya T; Sone T
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Jan; 53(1):283-291. PubMed ID: 32614123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Application of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 (PI-RADS v2): Interobserver Agreement and Positive Predictive Value for Localization of Intermediate- and High-Grade Prostate Cancers on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Chen F; Cen S; Palmer S
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Sep; 24(9):1101-1106. PubMed ID: 28546032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.