513 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27783837)
1. Comparison of Complications Following Revision of Metal-on-Metal Versus Metal-on-Polyethylene Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Nishio S; Fukunishi S; Yoshiya S; Sing DC; Hansen EN; Vail TP
Orthopedics; 2017 Jan; 40(1):e164-e169. PubMed ID: 27783837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Hip Arthroplasty: Is There an Association Between Infection and Bearing Surface Type?
Pitto RP; Sedel L
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2213-8. PubMed ID: 27249955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Complications Are Not Increased With Acetabular Revision of Metal-on-metal Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Penrose CT; Seyler TM; Wellman SS; Bolognesi MP; Lachiewicz PF
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2134-42. PubMed ID: 26987866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Outcomes of different bearings in total hip arthroplasty - implant survival, revision causes, and patient-reported outcome.
Varnum C
Dan Med J; 2017 Mar; 64(3):. PubMed ID: 28260601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty is not associated with cardiac disease.
Goodnough LH; Bala A; Huddleston J; Goodman SB; Maloney WJ; Amanatullah DF
Bone Joint J; 2018 Jan; 100-B(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 29305447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patient-Reported Outcomes After Revision of Metal-on-Metal Total Bearings in Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Mata-Fink A; Philipson DJ; Keeney BJ; Ramkumar DB; Moschetti WE; Tomek IM
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Apr; 32(4):1241-1244. PubMed ID: 27817993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Same survival but higher rate of osteolysis for metal-on-metal Ultamet versus ceramic-on-ceramic in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty after 8 years of follow-up.
Higuchi Y; Seki T; Takegami Y; Komatsu D; Morita D; Ishiguro N
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2018 Dec; 104(8):1155-1161. PubMed ID: 30269967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Do the Reasons for Ceramic-on-ceramic Revisions Differ From Other Bearings in Total Hip Arthroplasty?
Migaud H; Putman S; Kern G; Isida R; Girard J; Ramdane N; Delaunay CP; Hamadouche M;
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2190-9. PubMed ID: 27255729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. High Revision Rate for Large-head Metal-on-metal THA at a Mean of 7.1 Years: A Registry Study.
Seppänen M; Laaksonen I; Pulkkinen P; Eskelinen A; Puhto AP; Kettunen J; Leskinen J; Manninen M; Mäkelä K
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Jun; 476(6):1223-1230. PubMed ID: 29480891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Preoperative Risk Factors Associated With Poor Outcomes of Revision Surgery for "Pseudotumors" in Patients With Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty.
Liow MH; Dimitriou D; Tsai TY; Kwon YM
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Dec; 31(12):2835-2842. PubMed ID: 27387480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cumulative revision rate is higher in metal-on-metal THA than metal-on-polyethylene THA: analysis of survival in a community registry.
Huang DC; Tatman P; Mehle S; Gioe TJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2013 Jun; 471(6):1920-5. PubMed ID: 23392990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Postoperative Complications Following Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty With Other Hip Bearings in Medicare Population.
Kleeman LT; Bala A; Penrose CT; Seyler TM; Wellman SS; Bolognesi MP
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jun; 33(6):1826-1832. PubMed ID: 29510952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Revisions of Modular Metal-on-metal THA Have a High Risk of Early Complications.
Jennings JM; White S; Martin JR; Yang CC; Miner TM; Dennis DA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Feb; 477(2):344-350. PubMed ID: 30794222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of ten-year survivorship of hip prostheses with use of conventional polyethylene, metal-on-metal, or ceramic-on-ceramic bearings.
Milošev I; Kovač S; Trebše R; Levašič V; Pišot V
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Oct; 94(19):1756-63. PubMed ID: 23032586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High rate of infection after aseptic revision of failed metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.
Wyles CC; Van Demark RE; Sierra RJ; Trousdale RT
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Feb; 472(2):509-16. PubMed ID: 23846604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcomes after revision of metal on metal hip resurfacing to total arthroplasty using the direct anterior approach.
Bouveau V; Haen TX; Poupon J; Nich C
Int Orthop; 2018 Nov; 42(11):2543-2548. PubMed ID: 29520467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is There a Cardiotoxicity Associated With Metallic Head Hip Prostheses? A Cohort Study in the French National Health Insurance Databases.
Lassalle M; Colas S; Rudnichi A; Zureik M; Dray-Spira R
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Jul; 476(7):1441-1451. PubMed ID: 29698302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adverse Reactions to Metal on Metal Are Not Exclusive to Large Heads in Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Lombardi AV; Berend KR; Adams JB; Satterwhite KL
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):432-40. PubMed ID: 26497881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A prospective comparative study of hip resurfacing arthroplasty and large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty in younger patients-a minimum of five year follow-up.
Tao R; Liu F; Liu YK; Lu Y; Xu H; Cao Y; Zhou ZY; Wang W
Int Orthop; 2018 Oct; 42(10):2323-2327. PubMed ID: 29455347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative Mid-term Follow-up Study of Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty with Metal-on-metal and Metal-on-polyethylene Bearings.
Li Z; Chen ZF; Liu JX; Liu F
Orthop Surg; 2018 Nov; 10(4):312-320. PubMed ID: 30485684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
