261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27784198)
1. Hearing taboo words can result in early talker effects in word recognition for female listeners.
Tuft SE; MᶜLennan CT; Krestar ML
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Feb; 71(2):435-448. PubMed ID: 27784198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Famous talker effects in spoken word recognition.
Maibauer AM; Markis TA; Newell J; McLennan CT
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Jan; 76(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 24366633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Disentangling fast and slow attentional influences of negative and taboo spoken words in the emotional Stroop paradigm.
Bertels J; Kolinsky R
Cogn Emot; 2016 Sep; 30(6):1137-48. PubMed ID: 26197360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Speech perception in children with cochlear implants: effects of lexical difficulty, talker variability, and word length.
Kirk KI; Hay-McCutcheon M; Sehgal ST; Miyamoto RT
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 2000 Dec; 185():79-81. PubMed ID: 11141016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intelligibility of emotional speech in younger and older adults.
Dupuis K; Pichora-Fuller MK
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):695-707. PubMed ID: 25127327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lexical and talker effects on word recognition among native and non-native listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
Takayanagi S; Dirks DD; Moshfegh A
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Jun; 45(3):585-97. PubMed ID: 12069010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does Talker-Specific Information Influence Lexical Competition? Evidence From Phonological Priming.
Dufour S; Nguyen N
Cogn Sci; 2017 Nov; 41(8):2221-2233. PubMed ID: 27943403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Shock and awe: Distinct effects of taboo words on lexical decision and free recall.
Madan CR; Shafer AT; Chan M; Singhal A
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Apr; 70(4):793-810. PubMed ID: 27003746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Examining the time course of indexical specificity effects in spoken word recognition.
McLennan CT; Luce PA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Mar; 31(2):306-21. PubMed ID: 15755247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-lasting attentional influence of negative and taboo words in an auditory variant of the emotional Stroop task.
Bertels J; Kolinsky R; Pietrons E; Morais J
Emotion; 2011 Feb; 11(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 21401222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hemispheric differences in indexical specificity effects in spoken word recognition.
González J; McLennan CT
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Apr; 33(2):410-24. PubMed ID: 17469976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The effect of taboo word on language processing].
Huszár T; Makra E; Hallgató E; Janacsek K; Németh D
Psychiatr Hung; 2010; 25(6):525-37. PubMed ID: 21300999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interference of spoken word recognition through phonological priming from visual objects and printed words.
McQueen JM; Huettig F
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Jan; 76(1):190-200. PubMed ID: 24132709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Speaker information affects false recognition of unstudied lexical-semantic associates.
Luthra S; Fox NP; Blumstein SE
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 May; 80(4):894-912. PubMed ID: 29473144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Examining the effects of variation in emotional tone of voice on spoken word recognition.
Krestar ML; McLennan CT
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013 Sep; 66(9):1793-802. PubMed ID: 23405913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Aging, Emotion, Attention, and Binding in the Taboo Stroop Task: Data and Theories.
MacKay DG; Johnson LW; Graham ER; Burke DM
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2015 Oct; 12(10):12803-33. PubMed ID: 26473909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relations between emotion, memory, and attention: evidence from taboo stroop, lexical decision, and immediate memory tasks.
MacKay DG; Shafto M; Taylor JK; Marian DE; Abrams L; Dyer JR
Mem Cognit; 2004 Apr; 32(3):474-88. PubMed ID: 15285130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of stimulus variability on speech perception in listeners with hearing impairment.
Kirk KI; Pisoni DB; Miyamoto RC
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Dec; 40(6):1395-405. PubMed ID: 9430759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Examining talker effects in the perception of native- and foreign-accented speech.
McLennan CT; González J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):824-30. PubMed ID: 22618600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
