501 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27784311)
1. Two-port laparoscopic anterior resection through a self-made glove device versus conventional laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer: a comparison of short-term surgical results.
Zhang H; Ling Y; Cong J; Cui M; Liu D; Chen C
World J Surg Oncol; 2016 Oct; 14(1):275. PubMed ID: 27784311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The short-term outcomes of conventional and single-port laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer.
Kim SJ; Ryu GO; Choi BJ; Kim JG; Lee KJ; Lee SC; Oh ST
Ann Surg; 2011 Dec; 254(6):933-40. PubMed ID: 22107740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Technique and short-term outcomes of single-port surgery for rectal cancer: a feasibility study of 25 patients.
Bulut O; Aslak KK; Rosenstock S
Scand J Surg; 2014 Mar; 103(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 24056142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of short-term surgical results of single-port and multi-port laparoscopic rectal resection for rectal cancer.
Tei M; Wakasugi M; Akamatsu H
Am J Surg; 2015 Aug; 210(2):309-14. PubMed ID: 25910886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Resection of rectal cancer via an abdominal single-port access: short-term results and comparison with standard laparoscopy.
Sourrouille I; Dumont F; Goéré D; Honoré C; Elias D
Dis Colon Rectum; 2013 Nov; 56(11):1203-10. PubMed ID: 24104993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Efficacy analysis of suprapubic single-incision laparoscopy in the treatment of rectosigmoid cancer].
Liu R; Wang Y; Xiong W; Zhang Z; Deng H; Li G
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Jun; 19(6):647-53. PubMed ID: 27353098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A randomized pilot study on single-port versus conventional laparoscopic rectal surgery: effects on postoperative pain and the stress response to surgery.
Bulut O; Aslak KK; Levic K; Nielsen CB; Rømer E; Sørensen S; Christensen IJ; Nielsen HJ
Tech Coloproctol; 2015 Jan; 19(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 25380743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Single-port laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with transanal resection (transabdominal transanal resection) for low rectal cancer: initial experience with 22 cases.
Choi BJ; Lee SC; Kang WK
Int J Surg; 2013; 11(9):858-63. PubMed ID: 23962662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Oncologic outcomes of single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic anterior resection for sigmoid colon cancer: a propensity-score matching analysis.
Kim CW; Cho MS; Baek SJ; Hur H; Min BS; Kang J; Baik SH; Lee KY; Kim NK
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Mar; 22(3):924-30. PubMed ID: 25201498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A safety study of transumbilical single incision versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Wang Y; Liu R; Zhang Z; Xue Q; Yan J; Yu J; Liu H; Zhao L; Mou T; Deng H; Li G
Trials; 2015 Nov; 16():539. PubMed ID: 26620555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multimedia article. Laparoscopic ultralow anterior resection with colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis.
Selvindos PB; Ho YH
Dis Colon Rectum; 2008 Nov; 51(11):1710-1. PubMed ID: 18679748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial.
Kang SB; Park JW; Jeong SY; Nam BH; Choi HS; Kim DW; Lim SB; Lee TG; Kim DY; Kim JS; Chang HJ; Lee HS; Kim SY; Jung KH; Hong YS; Kim JH; Sohn DK; Kim DH; Oh JH
Lancet Oncol; 2010 Jul; 11(7):637-45. PubMed ID: 20610322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of short-term and oncologic outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic resection for mid- and distal rectal cancer.
Law WL; Foo DCC
Surg Endosc; 2017 Jul; 31(7):2798-2807. PubMed ID: 27785627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer results in higher lymph node yield and better short-term outcomes than open surgery: a large single-center comparative study.
Boutros M; Hippalgaonkar N; Silva E; Allende D; Wexner SD; Berho M
Dis Colon Rectum; 2013 Jun; 56(6):679-88. PubMed ID: 23652740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [A retrospective controlled clinical study of single-incision plus one port laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid colon and upper rectal cancer].
Li GX; Li JM; Wang YN; Deng HJ; Mou TY; Liu H
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jul; 55(7):515-520. PubMed ID: 28655080
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopy-assisted triple-port anterior resection].
Wu H; Zhang T; Chen X; Jing X; Cheng X; Song Z; Zhu L; He Y; Ji X; Zhang H; Zhao R
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Jul; 21(7):779-785. PubMed ID: 30051446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of single-incision plus one additional port laparoscopy-assisted anterior resection with conventional laparoscopy-assisted anterior resection for rectal cancer.
Kawamata F; Homma S; Minagawa N; Kawamura H; Takahashi N; Taketomi A
World J Surg; 2014 Oct; 38(10):2716-23. PubMed ID: 24852437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Comparative Study of Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer.
Levic K; Donatsky AM; Bulut O; Rosenberg J
Surg Innov; 2015 Aug; 22(4):368-75. PubMed ID: 25377216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transumbilical defunctioning ileostomy: A new approach for patients at risks of anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection.
Eto K; Omura N; Haruki K; Uno Y; Ohkuma M; Nakajima S; Anan T; Kosuge M; Fujita T; Ishida K; Yanaga K
Anticancer Res; 2013 Nov; 33(11):5011-5. PubMed ID: 24222144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial.
van der Pas MH; Haglind E; Cuesta MA; Fürst A; Lacy AM; Hop WC; Bonjer HJ;
Lancet Oncol; 2013 Mar; 14(3):210-8. PubMed ID: 23395398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
