188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27784334)
1. The effect of the 2-week wait referral system on the detection of and mortality from colorectal cancer: protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Mozdiak E; Tsertsvadze A; McFarlane M; Widlak M; Tabuso M; Dunlop A; Arasaradnam R
Syst Rev; 2016 Oct; 5(1):182. PubMed ID: 27784334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Community-onset sepsis and its public health burden: protocol of a systematic review.
Tsertsvadze A; Royle P; McCarthy N
Syst Rev; 2015 Sep; 4():119. PubMed ID: 26394931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inter general practice variability in use of referral guidelines for colorectal cancer.
John SK; Jones OM; Horseman N; Thomas P; Howell RD; Fozard JB
Colorectal Dis; 2007 Oct; 9(8):731-5. PubMed ID: 17854292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prioritization of colorectal referrals: a review of the 2-week wait referral system.
Rai S; Kelly MJ
Colorectal Dis; 2007 Mar; 9(3):195-202. PubMed ID: 17298615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of the lower gastrointestinal electronic referral protocol.
John SK; George S; Howell RD; Primrose JN; Fozard JB
Br J Surg; 2008 Apr; 95(4):506-14. PubMed ID: 18196552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interventions to improve screening and appropriate referral of patients with cancer for distress: systematic review protocol.
McCarter K; Britton B; Baker A; Halpin S; Beck A; Carter G; Wratten C; Bauer J; Booth D; Forbes E; Wolfenden L
BMJ Open; 2015 Sep; 5(9):e008277. PubMed ID: 26391631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relationship between the 'two-week rule' and colorectal cancer diagnosis.
Mangion D; Brennan A
Br J Nurs; 2014 Jun 26-Jul 9; 23(12):660-7. PubMed ID: 25039631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Regional variation in routes to diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma in England from 2006 to 2017.
Zalin-Miller A; Jose S; Knott C; Paley L; Tataru D; Morement H; Toledano MB; Khan SA
World J Gastroenterol; 2023 Jun; 29(24):3825-3842. PubMed ID: 37426314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration biopsy for detection of malignancy in pediatric thyroid nodules: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lai SW; Roberts DJ; Rabi DM; Winston KY
Syst Rev; 2015 Sep; 4():120. PubMed ID: 26399232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Two-week rule in head and neck cancer 2000-14: a systematic review.
Langton S; Siau D; Bankhead C
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Feb; 54(2):120-31. PubMed ID: 26795572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Systematic review with meta-analysis of over 90 000 patients. Does fast-track review diagnose colorectal cancer earlier?
Mozdiak E; Weldeselassie Y; McFarlane M; Tabuso M; Widlak MM; Dunlop A; Tsertsvadze A; Arasaradnam RP
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2019 Aug; 50(4):348-372. PubMed ID: 31286552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Primary care characteristics and stage of cancer at diagnosis using data from the national cancer registration service, quality outcomes framework and general practice information.
Maclean R; Jeffreys M; Ives A; Jones T; Verne J; Ben-Shlomo Y
BMC Cancer; 2015 Jul; 15():500. PubMed ID: 26141458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of pT4 stage II colorectal cancer with defective mismatch repair status: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
Huang LB; Yang TH; Yang L; Yu YY; Wang ZQ; Wang C; Zhou ZG
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Jun; 99(26):e20693. PubMed ID: 32590743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
