These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27784967)
1. Interendoscopist variability in proximal colon polyp detection is twice higher for serrated polyps than adenomas. Bretagne JF; Hamonic S; Piette C; Viel JF; Bouguen G World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Oct; 22(38):8549-8557. PubMed ID: 27784967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The proximal serrated polyp detection rate is an easy-to-measure proxy for the detection rate of clinically relevant serrated polyps. IJspeert JE; van Doorn SC; van der Brug YM; Bastiaansen BA; Fockens P; Dekker E Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Nov; 82(5):870-7. PubMed ID: 25935704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prevalence and variable detection of proximal colon serrated polyps during screening colonoscopy. Kahi CJ; Hewett DG; Norton DL; Eckert GJ; Rex DK Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2011 Jan; 9(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 20888435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Findings in the distal colorectum are not associated with proximal advanced serrated lesions. Kahi CJ; Vemulapalli KC; Snover DC; Abdel Jawad KH; Cummings OW; Rex DK Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2015 Feb; 13(2):345-51. PubMed ID: 25083562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differences in proximal serrated polyp detection among endoscopists are associated with variability in withdrawal time. de Wijkerslooth TR; Stoop EM; Bossuyt PM; Tytgat KM; Dees J; Mathus-Vliegen EM; Kuipers EJ; Fockens P; van Leerdam ME; Dekker E Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Apr; 77(4):617-23. PubMed ID: 23321338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adenoma and sessile serrated polyp detection rates: variation by patient sex and colonic segment but not specialty of the endoscopist. Sanaka MR; Gohel T; Podugu A; Kiran RP; Thota PN; Lopez R; Church JM; Burke CA Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Sep; 57(9):1113-9. PubMed ID: 25101608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection rate and proximal shift tendency of adenomas and serrated polyps: a retrospective study of 62,560 colonoscopies. Chen S; Sun K; Chao K; Sun Y; Hong L; Weng Z; Cui Y; Chen M; Zhang S Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Feb; 33(2):131-139. PubMed ID: 29282495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Significant Variation in the Detection Rates of Proximal Serrated Polyps Among Academic Gastroenterologists, Community Gastroenterologists, and Colorectal Surgeons in a Single Tertiary Care Center. Mandaliya R; Baig K; Barnhill M; Murugesan V; Som A; Mohammed U; Jhaveri K; Vangimalla SS; Raymond A; Tran J; Hasan L; Lewis JH; Cho W Dig Dis Sci; 2019 Sep; 64(9):2614-2621. PubMed ID: 31152331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Variation in the detection of serrated polyps in an average risk colorectal cancer screening cohort. Hetzel JT; Huang CS; Coukos JA; Omstead K; Cerda SR; Yang S; O'Brien MJ; Farraye FA Am J Gastroenterol; 2010 Dec; 105(12):2656-64. PubMed ID: 20717107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Providing data for serrated polyp detection rate benchmarks: an analysis of the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry. Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Weiss JE; Robinson CM Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Jun; 85(6):1188-1194. PubMed ID: 28153571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. High colonoscopic prevalence of proximal colon serrated polyps in average-risk men and women. Kahi CJ; Li X; Eckert GJ; Rex DK Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Mar; 75(3):515-20. PubMed ID: 22018551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detection of clinically relevant serrated polyps during screening colonoscopy: results from seven cooperating centers within the German colorectal screening program. Schramm C; Janhsen K; Hofer JH; Toermer H; Stelzer A; Stenschke F; Stollenwerk M; Scheller I; Lang S; Goeser T; Steffen HM Endoscopy; 2018 Oct; 50(10):993-1000. PubMed ID: 29727905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection rates for adenomas, serrated polyps and clinically relevant serrated polyps can be easily estimated by individually calculated detection rate ratios. Buerger M; Kasper P; Scheller I; Hofer JH; Toermer H; Stelzer A; Stenschke F; Stollenwerk M; Allo G; Goeser T; Steffen HM; Schramm C Scand J Gastroenterol; 2020 Jun; 55(6):745-751. PubMed ID: 32524866 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Endoscopic detection of proximal serrated lesions and pathologic identification of sessile serrated adenomas/polyps vary on the basis of center. Payne SR; Church TR; Wandell M; Rösch T; Osborn N; Snover D; Day RW; Ransohoff DF; Rex DK Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Jul; 12(7):1119-26. PubMed ID: 24333512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Simple proxies for detection of clinically significant serrated polyps and data for their benchmarks. Park SK; Park SH; Yang HJ; Jung YS; Park JH; Sohn CI; Park DI J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2020 Aug; 35(8):1365-1371. PubMed ID: 31907971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Are adenoma and serrated polyp detection rates correlated with endoscopists' sensitivity of optical diagnosis? Bronzwaer MES; Vleugels JLA; van Doorn SC; Dijkgraaf MGW; Fockens P; Dekker E; Endoscopy; 2020 Sep; 52(9):763-772. PubMed ID: 32349138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]