345 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27785561)
1. Validation of the Phillips et al. GENEActiv accelerometer wrist cut-points in children aged 5-8 years old.
Duncan MJ; Wilson S; Tallis J; Eyre E
Eur J Pediatr; 2016 Dec; 175(12):2019-2021. PubMed ID: 27785561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Calibration of GENEActiv accelerometer wrist cut-points for the assessment of physical activity intensity of preschool aged children.
Roscoe CMP; James RS; Duncan MJ
Eur J Pediatr; 2017 Aug; 176(8):1093-1098. PubMed ID: 28674825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Personalised Accelerometer Cut-point Prediction for Older Adults' Movement Behaviours using a Machine Learning approach.
Nnamoko N; Cabrera-Diego LA; Campbell D; Sanders G; Fairclough SJ; Korkontzelos I
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2021 Sep; 208():106165. PubMed ID: 34118492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using accelerometry to classify physical activity intensity in older adults: What is the optimal wear-site?
Duncan MJ; Rowlands A; Lawson C; Leddington Wright S; Hill M; Morris M; Eyre E; Tallis J
Eur J Sport Sci; 2020 Sep; 20(8):1131-1139. PubMed ID: 31726952
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimating Physical Activity in Children Aged 8-11 Years Using Accelerometry: Contributions From Fundamental Movement Skills and Different Accelerometer Placements.
Duncan MJ; Roscoe CMP; Faghy M; Tallis J; Eyre ELJ
Front Physiol; 2019; 10():242. PubMed ID: 30936837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Calibration and Cross-Validation of Accelerometery for Estimating Movement Skills in Children Aged 8-12 Years.
Duncan MJ; Dobell A; Noon M; Clark CCT; Roscoe CMP; Faghy MA; Stodden D; Sacko R; Eyre ELJ
Sensors (Basel); 2020 May; 20(10):. PubMed ID: 32414192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Children's physical activity assessed with wrist- and hip-worn accelerometers.
Rowlands AV; Rennie K; Kozarski R; Stanley RM; Eston RG; Parfitt GC; Olds TS
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2014 Dec; 46(12):2308-16. PubMed ID: 24781890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparability of children's sedentary time estimates derived from wrist worn GENEActiv and hip worn ActiGraph accelerometer thresholds.
Boddy LM; Noonan RJ; Kim Y; Rowlands AV; Welk GJ; Knowles ZR; Fairclough SJ
J Sci Med Sport; 2018 Oct; 21(10):1045-1049. PubMed ID: 29650338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cross-validation of Actigraph derived accelerometer cut-points for assessment of sedentary behaviour and physical activity in children aged 8-11 years.
Duncan MJ; Eyre ELJ; Cox V; Roscoe CMP; Faghy MA; Tallis J; Dobell A
Acta Paediatr; 2020 Sep; 109(9):1825-1830. PubMed ID: 31984545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cross-validation of cut-points in preschool children using different accelerometer placements and data axes.
Altenburg TM; de Vries L; Op den Buijsch R; Eyre E; Dobell A; Duncan M; Chinapaw MJM
J Sports Sci; 2022 Feb; 40(4):379-385. PubMed ID: 35040373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Calibration of the GENEA accelerometer for assessment of physical activity intensity in children.
Phillips LR; Parfitt G; Rowlands AV
J Sci Med Sport; 2013 Mar; 16(2):124-8. PubMed ID: 22770768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development of cut-points for determining activity intensity from a wrist-worn ActiGraph accelerometer in free-living adults.
Montoye AHK; Clevenger KA; Pfeiffer KA; Nelson MB; Bock JM; Imboden MT; Kaminsky LA
J Sports Sci; 2020 Nov; 38(22):2569-2578. PubMed ID: 32677510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Calibrating Wrist-Worn Accelerometers for Physical Activity Assessment in Preschoolers: Machine Learning Approaches.
Li S; Howard JT; Sosa ET; Cordova A; Parra-Medina D; Yin Z
JMIR Form Res; 2020 Aug; 4(8):e16727. PubMed ID: 32667893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The validity of the GENEActiv wrist-worn accelerometer for measuring adult sedentary time in free living.
Pavey TG; Gomersall SR; Clark BK; Brown WJ
J Sci Med Sport; 2016 May; 19(5):395-9. PubMed ID: 25956687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development of raw acceleration cut-points for wrist and hip accelerometers to assess sedentary behaviour and physical activity in 5-7-year-old children.
Crotti M; Foweather L; Rudd JR; Hurter L; Schwarz S; Boddy LM
J Sports Sci; 2020 May; 38(9):1036-1045. PubMed ID: 32228156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Calibration and Cross-Validation of Accelerometer Cut-Points to Classify Sedentary Time and Physical Activity from Hip and Non-Dominant and Dominant Wrists in Older Adults.
Migueles JH; Cadenas-Sanchez C; Alcantara JMA; Leal-Martín J; Mañas A; Ara I; Glynn NW; Shiroma EJ
Sensors (Basel); 2021 May; 21(10):. PubMed ID: 34064790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Number of Days Required to Estimate Habitual Activity Using Wrist-Worn GENEActiv Accelerometer: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Dillon CB; Fitzgerald AP; Kearney PM; Perry IJ; Rennie KL; Kozarski R; Phillips CM
PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0109913. PubMed ID: 27149674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Wrist-based cut-points for moderate- and vigorous-intensity physical activity for the Actical accelerometer in adults.
Diaz KM; Krupka DJ; Chang MJ; Kronish IM; Moise N; Goldsmith J; Schwartz JE
J Sports Sci; 2018 Jan; 36(2):206-212. PubMed ID: 28282744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Separating bedtime rest from activity using waist or wrist-worn accelerometers in youth.
Tracy DJ; Xu Z; Choi L; Acra S; Chen KY; Buchowski MS
PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e92512. PubMed ID: 24727999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Field evaluation of a random forest activity classifier for wrist-worn accelerometer data.
Pavey TG; Gilson ND; Gomersall SR; Clark B; Trost SG
J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Jan; 20(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 27372275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
