These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27786075)
21. Statistical evaluation of some mandibular reference positions in normal young people. Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Miani A; D'Addona A; Tartaglia G Int J Prosthodont; 1992; 5(2):158-65. PubMed ID: 1524637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Active range of motion of the head and cervical spine: a three-dimensional investigation in healthy young adults. Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Serrao G; Grassi G; Mossi E J Orthop Res; 2002 Jan; 20(1):122-9. PubMed ID: 11853078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Upper cervical range of motion is impaired in patients with temporomandibular disorders. Grondin F; Hall T; Laurentjoye M; Ella B Cranio; 2015 Apr; 33(2):91-9. PubMed ID: 25919749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Can parameters of the helical axis be measured reliably during active cervical movements? Barbero M; Falla D; Clijsen R; Ghirlanda F; Schneebeli A; Ernst MJ; Cescon C Musculoskelet Sci Pract; 2017 Feb; 27():150-154. PubMed ID: 27847241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Reliability of measuring half-cycle cervical range of motion may be increased using a spirit level for calibration. Wilke J; Niederer D; Vogt L; Banzer W Musculoskelet Sci Pract; 2018 Feb; 33():99-104. PubMed ID: 28869199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Cervical flexion-rotation test and physiological range of motion - A comparative study of patients with myogenic temporomandibular disorder versus healthy subjects. Greenbaum T; Dvir Z; Reiter S; Winocur E Musculoskelet Sci Pract; 2017 Feb; 27():7-13. PubMed ID: 28637604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Age-Related and Degenerative Changes in the Osseous Anatomy, Alignment, and Range of Motion of the Cervical Spine: A Comparative Study of Radiographic Data From 1016 Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy and 1230 Asymptomatic Subjects. Machino M; Yukawa Y; Imagama S; Ito K; Katayama Y; Matsumoto T; Inoue T; Ouchida J; Tomita K; Ishiguro N; Kato F Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Mar; 41(6):476-82. PubMed ID: 26571180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Natural variation of cervical range of motion: a one-way repeated-measures design. Christensen HW; Nilsson N J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1998; 21(6):383-7. PubMed ID: 9726064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Cervical motion assessment using virtual reality. Sarig-Bahat H; Weiss PL; Laufer Y Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(10):1018-24. PubMed ID: 19404177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The Effect of Target Position on the Accuracy of Cervical-Spine-Rotation Active Joint-Position Sense. Nagai T; Clark NC; Abt JP; Sell TC; Heebner NR; Smalley BW; Wirt MD; Lephart SM J Sport Rehabil; 2016 Feb; 25(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 25803657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Neck motion due to the halo-vest in prone and supine positions. Ivancic PC; Telles CJ Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 May; 35(10):E400-6. PubMed ID: 20118835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Errors in precise examiner head placement during cervical range-of-motion measurements. Chen J; Lantz CA; Solinger AB J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2001 Jun; 24(5):327-30. PubMed ID: 11416822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of intervertebral disc height on the range of motion and clinical outcomes after single-level implantation of Prestige LP cervical disc prosthesis. Li H; Lou J; Liu H; Wang B Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2016 Sep; 148():1-4. PubMed ID: 27348742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Active cervical and lumbar range of motion during performance of activities of daily living in healthy young adults. Cobian DG; Daehn NS; Anderson PA; Heiderscheit BC Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Sep; 38(20):1754-63. PubMed ID: 23823575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Morphologic differences in intervertebral foramina: a radiographic study of cervical spine positions in asymptomatic men. Sato T; Masui K J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2013 Jun; 36(5):327-32. PubMed ID: 23769602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Head-trunk kinematics during high-velocity-low-amplitude manipulation of the cervical spine in asymptomatic subjects: helical axis computation and anatomic motion modeling. Dugailly PM; Sobczak S; Van Geyt B; Bonnechère B; Maroye L; Moiseev F; Rooze M; Salvia P; Feipel V J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2015; 38(6):416-24. PubMed ID: 26215899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cervical spine reposition errors after cervical flexion and extension. Wang X; Lindstroem R; Carstens NP; Graven-Nielsen T BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Mar; 18(1):102. PubMed ID: 28288610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Reproducibility and validity of digital inclinometry for measuring cervical range of motion in normal subjects. Prushansky T; Deryi O; Jabarreen B Physiother Res Int; 2010 Mar; 15(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 19554615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The factors that influence the postoperative segmental range of motion after cervical artificial disc replacement. Kang KC; Lee CS; Han JH; Chung SS Spine J; 2010 Aug; 10(8):689-96. PubMed ID: 20547108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The influence of cervical spine flexion-rotation range-of-motion asymmetry on postural stability in older adults. Quek JM; Pua YH; Bryant AL; Clark RA Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Sep; 38(19):1648-55. PubMed ID: 23778365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]