These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27787702)

  • 21. Automation of absolute protein-ligand binding free energy calculations for docking refinement and compound evaluation.
    Heinzelmann G; Gilson MK
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jan; 11(1):1116. PubMed ID: 33441879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Non-equilibrium approach for binding free energies in cyclodextrins in SAMPL7: force fields and software.
    Khalak Y; Tresadern G; de Groot BL; Gapsys V
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Jan; 35(1):49-61. PubMed ID: 33230742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. All-atom/coarse-grained hybrid predictions of distribution coefficients in SAMPL5.
    Genheden S; Essex JW
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Nov; 30(11):969-976. PubMed ID: 27460060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. SAMPL6 host-guest binding affinities and binding poses from spherical-coordinates-biased simulations.
    Sun Z; He Q; Li X; Zhu Z
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 May; 34(5):589-600. PubMed ID: 31974852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Blind prediction of distribution in the SAMPL5 challenge with QM based protomer and pK
    Pickard FC; König G; Tofoleanu F; Lee J; Simmonett AC; Shao Y; Ponder JW; Brooks BR
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Nov; 30(11):1087-1100. PubMed ID: 27646286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prediction of cyclohexane-water distribution coefficient for SAMPL5 drug-like compounds with the QMPFF3 and ARROW polarizable force fields.
    Kamath G; Kurnikov I; Fain B; Leontyev I; Illarionov A; Butin O; Olevanov M; Pereyaslavets L
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Nov; 30(11):977-988. PubMed ID: 27585472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Extended solvent-contact model approach to blind SAMPL5 prediction challenge for the distribution coefficients of drug-like molecules.
    Chung KC; Park H
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Nov; 30(11):1019-1033. PubMed ID: 27448686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. DLPGEN: Preparing Molecular Dynamics Simulations with Support for Polarizable Force Fields.
    Bernardes CES
    J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Mar; 62(6):1471-1478. PubMed ID: 35239343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Partition coefficients for the SAMPL5 challenge using transfer free energies.
    Jones MR; Brooks BR; Wilson AK
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Nov; 30(11):1129-1138. PubMed ID: 27646287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. SAMPL7 TrimerTrip host-guest binding poses and binding affinities from spherical-coordinates-biased simulations.
    Sun Z
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Jan; 35(1):105-115. PubMed ID: 32776199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. BFEE2: Automated, Streamlined, and Accurate Absolute Binding Free-Energy Calculations.
    Fu H; Chen H; Cai W; Shao X; Chipot C
    J Chem Inf Model; 2021 May; 61(5):2116-2123. PubMed ID: 33906354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Precise force-field-based calculations of octanol-water partition coefficients for the SAMPL7 molecules.
    Fan S; Nedev H; Vijayan R; Iorga BI; Beckstein O
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Jul; 35(7):853-870. PubMed ID: 34232435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. SAMPL6 host-guest challenge: binding free energies via a multistep approach.
    Eken Y; Patel P; Díaz T; Jones MR; Wilson AK
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1097-1115. PubMed ID: 30225724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Molecular Environment-Specific Atomic Charges Improve Binding Affinity Predictions of SAMPL5 Host-Guest Systems.
    González D; Macaya L; Vöhringer-Martinez E
    J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Sep; 61(9):4462-4474. PubMed ID: 34464129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Tuning Potential Functions to Host-Guest Binding Data.
    Setiadi J; Boothroyd S; Slochower DR; Dotson DL; Thompson MW; Wagner JR; Wang LP; Gilson MK
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2024 Jan; 20(1):239-252. PubMed ID: 38147689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assessing the accuracy of octanol-water partition coefficient predictions in the SAMPL6 Part II log P Challenge.
    Işık M; Bergazin TD; Fox T; Rizzi A; Chodera JD; Mobley DL
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Apr; 34(4):335-370. PubMed ID: 32107702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Adapting the semi-explicit assembly solvation model for estimating water-cyclohexane partitioning with the SAMPL5 molecules.
    Brini E; Paranahewage SS; Fennell CJ; Dill KA
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Nov; 30(11):1067-1077. PubMed ID: 27632227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Predicting cyclohexane/water distribution coefficients for the SAMPL5 challenge using MOSCED and the SMD solvation model.
    Diaz-Rodriguez S; Bozada SM; Phifer JR; Paluch AS
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Nov; 30(11):1007-1017. PubMed ID: 27565796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Absolute binding free energies for the SAMPL6 cucurbit[8]uril host-guest challenge via the AMOEBA polarizable force field.
    Laury ML; Wang Z; Gordon AS; Ponder JW
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1087-1095. PubMed ID: 30324303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Blind prediction of cyclohexane-water distribution coefficients from the SAMPL5 challenge.
    Bannan CC; Burley KH; Chiu M; Shirts MR; Gilson MK; Mobley DL
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Nov; 30(11):927-944. PubMed ID: 27677750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.