These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27787827)

  • 1. Predicting Real-Valued Protein Residue Fluctuation Using FlexPred.
    Peterson L; Jamroz M; Kolinski A; Kihara D
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1484():175-186. PubMed ID: 27787827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Enhanced prediction of conformational flexibility and phosphorylation in proteins.
    Swaminathan K; Adamczak R; Porollo A; Meller J
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2010; 680():307-19. PubMed ID: 20865514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A large-scale comparison of computational models on the residue flexibility for NMR-derived proteins.
    Zhang H; Shi H; Hanlon M
    Protein Pept Lett; 2012 Feb; 19(2):244-51. PubMed ID: 21933137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. BindML/BindML+: Detecting Protein-Protein Interaction Interface Propensity from Amino Acid Substitution Patterns.
    Wei Q; La D; Kihara D
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1529():279-289. PubMed ID: 27914057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Structural features that predict real-value fluctuations of globular proteins.
    Jamroz M; Kolinski A; Kihara D
    Proteins; 2012 May; 80(5):1425-35. PubMed ID: 22328193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modeling Binding Affinity of Pathological Mutations for Computational Protein Design.
    Romero-Durana M; Pallara C; Glaser F; Fernández-Recio J
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1529():139-159. PubMed ID: 27914049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. FlexPred: a web-server for predicting residue positions involved in conformational switches in proteins.
    Kuznetsov IB; McDuffie M
    Bioinformation; 2008; 3(3):134-6. PubMed ID: 19238251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing atomistic simulation data with the NMR experiment: how much can NOEs actually tell us?
    Zagrovic B; van Gunsteren WF
    Proteins; 2006 Apr; 63(1):210-8. PubMed ID: 16425239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. FlexServ: an integrated tool for the analysis of protein flexibility.
    Camps J; Carrillo O; Emperador A; Orellana L; Hospital A; Rueda M; Cicin-Sain D; D'Abramo M; Gelpí JL; Orozco M
    Bioinformatics; 2009 Jul; 25(13):1709-10. PubMed ID: 19429600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. CABS-flex 2.0: a web server for fast simulations of flexibility of protein structures.
    Kuriata A; Gierut AM; Oleniecki T; Ciemny MP; Kolinski A; Kurcinski M; Kmiecik S
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2018 Jul; 46(W1):W338-W343. PubMed ID: 29762700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An automated approach to network features of protein structure ensembles.
    Bhattacharyya M; Bhat CR; Vishveshwara S
    Protein Sci; 2013 Oct; 22(10):1399-416. PubMed ID: 23934896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. CABS-flex: Server for fast simulation of protein structure fluctuations.
    Jamroz M; Kolinski A; Kmiecik S
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2013 Jul; 41(Web Server issue):W427-31. PubMed ID: 23658222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The RCI server: rapid and accurate calculation of protein flexibility using chemical shifts.
    Berjanskii MV; Wishart DS
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2007 Jul; 35(Web Server issue):W531-7. PubMed ID: 17485469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. PROFbval: predict flexible and rigid residues in proteins.
    Schlessinger A; Yachdav G; Rost B
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Apr; 22(7):891-3. PubMed ID: 16455751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. PredyFlexy: flexibility and local structure prediction from sequence.
    de Brevern AG; Bornot A; Craveur P; Etchebest C; Gelly JC
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2012 Jul; 40(Web Server issue):W317-22. PubMed ID: 22689641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Protein-protein docking in CAPRI using ATTRACT to account for global and local flexibility.
    May A; Zacharias M
    Proteins; 2007 Dec; 69(4):774-80. PubMed ID: 17803217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. EasyAmber: A comprehensive toolbox to automate the molecular dynamics simulation of proteins.
    Suplatov D; Sharapova Y; Švedas V
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2020 Dec; 18(6):2040011. PubMed ID: 32833550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. NMR-assisted protein structure prediction with MELDxMD.
    Robertson JC; Nassar R; Liu C; Brini E; Dill KA; Perez A
    Proteins; 2019 Dec; 87(12):1333-1340. PubMed ID: 31350773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A GRID-derived water network stabilizes molecular dynamics computer simulations of a protease.
    Wallnoefer HG; Liedl KR; Fox T
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Nov; 51(11):2860-7. PubMed ID: 21970362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Incorporation of flexibility into rigid-body docking: applications in rounds 3-5 of CAPRI.
    Smith GR; Fitzjohn PW; Page CS; Bates PA
    Proteins; 2005 Aug; 60(2):263-8. PubMed ID: 15981258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.