These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

585 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27787926)

  • 1. A cross-continental comparison of plant and beetle responses to retention of forest patches during timber harvest.
    Baker SC; Halpern CB; Wardlaw TJ; Kern C; Edgar GJ; Thomson RJ; Bigley RE; Franklin JF; Gandhi KJ; Gustafsson L; Johnson S; Palik BJ; Spies TA; Steel EA; Weslien J; Strengbom J
    Ecol Appl; 2016 Dec; 26(8):2493-2504. PubMed ID: 27787926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Combining aggregated and dispersed tree retention harvesting for conservation of vascular plant communities.
    Franklin CMA; Macdonald SE; Nielsen SE
    Ecol Appl; 2018 Oct; 28(7):1830-1840. PubMed ID: 29992697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Uneven-aged silviculture can enhance within stand heterogeneity and beetle diversity.
    Joelsson K; Hjältén J; Work T
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Jan; 205():1-8. PubMed ID: 28961435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Saproxylic and non-saproxylic beetle assemblages in boreal spruce forests of different age and forestry intensity.
    Stenbacka F; Hjältén J; Hilszczański J; Dynesius M
    Ecol Appl; 2010 Dec; 20(8):2310-21. PubMed ID: 21265460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can retention forestry help conserve biodiversity? A meta-analysis.
    Fedrowitz K; Koricheva J; Baker SC; Lindenmayer DB; Palik B; Rosenvald R; Beese W; Franklin JF; Kouki J; Macdonald E; Messier C; Sverdrup-Thygeson A; Gustafsson L
    J Appl Ecol; 2014 Dec; 51(6):1669-1679. PubMed ID: 25552747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retention forestry influences understory diversity and functional identity.
    Curzon MT; Kern CC; Baker SC; Palik BJ; D'Amato AW
    Ecol Appl; 2020 Jul; 30(5):e02097. PubMed ID: 32078225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Functional diversity response to hardwood forest management varies across taxa and spatial scales.
    Murray BD; Holland JD; Summerville KS; Dunning JB; Saunders MR; Jenkins MA
    Ecol Appl; 2017 Jun; 27(4):1064-1081. PubMed ID: 28295816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Historical harvests reduce neighboring old-growth basal area across a forest landscape.
    Bell DM; Spies TA; Pabst R
    Ecol Appl; 2017 Jul; 27(5):1666-1676. PubMed ID: 28421698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ten-year responses of ground-dwelling spiders to retention harvest in the boreal forest.
    Pinzon J; Spence JR; Langor DW; Shorthouse DP
    Ecol Appl; 2016 Dec; 26(8):2579-2597. PubMed ID: 27907260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of reforestation practices on Staphylinid beetles (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae) in Southwestern China forests.
    Luo TH; Yu XD; Zhou HZ
    Environ Entomol; 2013 Feb; 42(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 23339781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Level and pattern of overstory retention interact to shape long-term responses of understories to timber harvest.
    Halpern CB; Halaj J; Evans SA; Dovciak M
    Ecol Appl; 2012 Dec; 22(8):2049-64. PubMed ID: 23387109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lower alpha, higher beta, and similar gamma diversity of saproxylic beetles in unmanaged compared to managed Norway spruce stands.
    Gran O
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(7):e0271092. PubMed ID: 35802717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. High levels of green-tree retention are required to preserve ground beetle biodiversity in boreal mixedwood forests.
    Work TT; Jacobs JM; Spence JR; Volney WJ
    Ecol Appl; 2010 Apr; 20(3):741-51. PubMed ID: 20437960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Living near the edge: Being close to mature forest increases the rate of succession in beetle communities.
    Fountain-Jones NM; Jordan GJ; Baker TP; Balmer JM; Wardlaw T; Baker SC
    Ecol Appl; 2015 Apr; 25(3):800-11. PubMed ID: 26214924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Short-term responses of small mammal diversity to varying stand-scale patterns of retention tree patches.
    Sultaire SM; Kroll AJ; Verschuyl J; Roloff GJ
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(8):e0273630. PubMed ID: 36044523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Burning of logged sites to protect beetles in managed boreal forests.
    Toivanen T; Kotiaho JS
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Dec; 21(6):1562-72. PubMed ID: 18173480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Forest management strategy affects saproxylic beetle assemblages: A comparison of even and uneven-aged silviculture using direct and indirect sampling.
    Joelsson K; Hjältén J; Gibb H
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0194905. PubMed ID: 29634728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selective‐logging and oil palm: multitaxon impacts, biodiversity indicators, and trade‐offs for conservation planning.
    Edwards DP; Magrach A; Woodcock P; Ji Y; Lim NT-; Edwards FA; Larsen TH; Hsu WW; Benedick S; Khen CV; Chung AYC; Reynolds G; Fisher B; Laurance WF; Wilcove DS; Hamer KC; Yu DW
    Ecol Appl; 2014; 24(8):2029-49. PubMed ID: 29185670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of productivity on biodiversity in forest ecosystems across the United States and China.
    Liang J; Watson JV; Zhou M; Lei X
    Conserv Biol; 2016 Apr; 30(2):308-17. PubMed ID: 26954431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of within stand disturbance in plantation forests indicate complex and contrasting responses among and within beetle families.
    Mladenović S; Loskotová T; Boháč J; Pavlíček J; Brestovanský J; Horák J
    Bull Entomol Res; 2018 Dec; 108(6):750-764. PubMed ID: 29307311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.