These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27788276)

  • 21. Word learning by preschoolers with SLI: effect of phonotactic probability and object familiarity.
    Gray S; Brinkley S; Svetina D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Oct; 55(5):1289-300. PubMed ID: 22411280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A corpus of consonant-vowel-consonant real words and nonwords: comparison of phonotactic probability, neighborhood density, and consonant age of acquisition.
    Storkel HL
    Behav Res Methods; 2013 Dec; 45(4):1159-67. PubMed ID: 23307574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An online calculator to compute phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on the basis of child corpora of spoken American English.
    Storkel HL; Hoover JR
    Behav Res Methods; 2010 May; 42(2):497-506. PubMed ID: 20479181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A Cross-Sectional Comparison of the Effects of Phonotactic Probability and Neighborhood Density on Word Learning by Preschool Children.
    Hoover JR; Storkel HL; Hogan TP
    J Mem Lang; 2010 Jul; 63(1):100-116. PubMed ID: 20563243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The influence of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on children's production of newly learned words.
    Heisler L; Goffman L
    Lang Learn Dev; 2016; 12(3):338-356. PubMed ID: 27284274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Triggering word learning in children with Language Impairment: the effect of phonotactic probability and neighbourhood density.
    McKean C; Letts C; Howard D
    J Child Lang; 2014 Nov; 41(6):1224-48. PubMed ID: 24191951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Phonotactic probability effects in children who stutter.
    Anderson JD; Byrd CT
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Aug; 51(4):851-66. PubMed ID: 18658056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Independent Effects of Phonotactic Probability and Neighborhood Density on Lexical Acquisition by Preschool Children.
    Storkel HL; Lee SY
    Lang Cogn Process; 2011; 26(2):191-211. PubMed ID: 21643455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of prior phonotactic knowledge on infant word segmentation: the case of nonadjacent dependencies.
    Gonzalez-Gomez N; Nazzi T
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Jun; 56(3):840-9. PubMed ID: 23275409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Learning about sounds contributes to learning about words: effects of prosody and phonotactics on infant word learning.
    Graf Estes K; Bowen S
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Mar; 114(3):405-17. PubMed ID: 23177349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Word recognition and nonword repetition in children with language disorders: the effects of neighborhood density, lexical frequency, and phonotactic probability.
    Rispens J; Baker A; Duinmeijer I
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Feb; 58(1):78-92. PubMed ID: 25421294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The influence of word characteristics on the vocabulary of children with cochlear implants.
    Han MK; Storkel HL; Lee J; Yoshinaga-Itano C
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2015 Jul; 20(3):242-51. PubMed ID: 25802320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Sublexical and lexical representations in speech production: effects of phonotactic probability and onset density.
    Vitevitch MS; Armbruster J; Chu S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Mar; 30(2):514-29. PubMed ID: 14979821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Phonotactic probability effect in nonword recall and its relationship with vocabulary in monolingual and bilingual preschoolers.
    Messer MH; Leseman PP; Boom J; Mayo AY
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2010 Apr; 105(4):306-23. PubMed ID: 20116805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. When statistics collide: The use of transitional and phonotactic probability cues to word boundaries.
    Dal Ben R; Souza DH; Hay JF
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Oct; 49(7):1300-1310. PubMed ID: 33751490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Finding patterns and learning words: Infant phonotactic knowledge is associated with vocabulary size.
    Graf Estes K; Gluck SC; Grimm KJ
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2016 Jun; 146():34-49. PubMed ID: 26905502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Disentangling the Role of Biphone Probability From Neighborhood Density in the Perception of Nonwords.
    Steffman J; Sundara M
    Lang Speech; 2024 Mar; 67(1):166-202. PubMed ID: 37161351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Wordlikeness and word learning in children with hearing loss.
    Stiles DJ; McGregor KK; Bentler RA
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2013; 48(2):200-6. PubMed ID: 23472959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Neuromagnetic evidence for the timing of lexical activation: an MEG component sensitive to phonotactic probability but not to neighborhood density.
    Pylkkänen L; Stringfellow A; Marantz A
    Brain Lang; 2002; 81(1-3):666-78. PubMed ID: 12081430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.